High Court Writ Petition concerning the stationing of a section law in an FIR. Dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear at hearings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t32s6I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 19812 OF 2023
Between:
Gadasu Laxmi, W/o. G. Ashok Aged about 35 Years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. Dontanapalli Village, Shankarpalli N/landal Ranga Reddy District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF IVANDAIVUS declaring the action of the respondents in not altering the appropriate section of the law in FIR No. 22 of 2023, dated 10.07.2023 on the file of PS I\4okila, Shankarpalli Mandal Ranga Reddy District, is illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the provisrons of Criminal Procedure, Code and as well as the violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the constitution
of lndia and consequentry direct the respondents porice to arter the section of raw rn appropriate sections
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the peiition, ir'e Higr, court may o" p[rrJ'to direct the respondent porice to arter the provision of raw i.e., ioz or tpc ino other approprrate sections in FIR No. 22 0i 2023, dated 10.o7.2023 0n the fire of PS l/okila, shankarpaili Mandar Ranga Reddy District pending disposar of ihe main Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A. JAGAN
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 4: ASST. Gp FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No.S to 7: - - - -
The Court made the following: ORDER
I 1 i5
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.19812 of 2023
ORDER:
On 05.09.2023, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there u,as no representation for the petitioner and hence, the matter was adjourned to 20.O9.2023. On 20.09.2023, at request of learned counsel lor thepetitioner, the matter was directed to be listed on 1 1. 1O.2023. On 1 1 .1.O .2023 again there was no representation [or the petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed to today Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. This sho['s that the petitioner is not interested toprosecute the \'rit petition
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed lor non pr0se cu'rion. No costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous applications, if anl', per-rding shall stand dismissed
SD/.K.SREERMAMURTHY ASSISTANT REGIST R ,TRUE COPY// SECTI OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to SRI A. JAGAN, Advocate [OPUC] i i;; cc=i" cF ronHouE,High cdurt for ihe state of relangana [oUT]
BN SB q,
HIGH COURT
DATED:0811112023
L STAI6
1 I
z
c r)
[,.\ 0t[ ?023 ,t;
"' i
,/ r .r/
i Dre ,i.(, ',,.,,
-.r/
ORDER
WP.No.19812 ot 2023
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS @[q,'tg ge,ir--tt'\o
Gadasu Laxmi
State of Telangana
Pathulothu Raju
Pathulothu Saritha
C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
