The High Court at Hyderabad, via an interim order under Art 226 and S. 151 CPC, allowed the petitioner liberty to challenge a List for Contempts issued by a bank. The Standing Counsel argued the petition was not maintainable without such a challenge. The matter was dismissed with liberty to approach the original issuing authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
132521
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLT NANDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 19686 OF 2023
Between:
Kollipara Aravinda Babu, S/o. K. Ramachandraiah, Aged about 73 years, R/o.Plot No.64, Flat No.301, Hemadurga Prestige, GoMhami Society, Kondapur' R'R District - 500 084
...pETrroNER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction, more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to act in accordance with law and to direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere in any manner with the travel of the petitioner from RGIA, Shamshabad to outside lndia except by following due process of law.
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere in any manner with the travel of the petitioner from RGIA, Shamshabad to outside lndia, except by following due process of law, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VEDULA CHITRALEKHA
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI R. MANGULAL
(CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL)
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON, 3I. E MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLT NAI..IDA
WRIT PETITION No.19686 OF 2023
ORDER:
Heard earned counsel for the pet i1:ir:rrre,r, and Mr.R,Mangula, Igarnecl Standing Counsr:l appr:aring for Central Gover r rnent,
2, The pet ti cner has approached this; Cortrr[, :;eeking the following'e lief :
3, Learned t;tariciing Courrsr:l for respondenl-s' pl.lces on record writt€n i-rstructic,ns datc:d 77.07.202l, ard the same reads as undr:-
"It is; sub n ttrld th,r: ;r LOC has been ist;ued a(_rairrst Kollipara ,Aravinda 3abu, Sir: K.Ranracranr:lri;r, at the bel-t:'1: rf the 14anaging Director anrl CECr, Ba rk Of Ba' C), I4ttnrbat irr..-.le r-efe enCe No. BCC:5lil'1 Lt-tC'' , ,rr,,n, Dateci 02/OBt2C:21 '.ry tfr
I
2
instructions "Prevent subject from leaving Indian and inform orig inator".
3
the prer rent Writ petition is not ntaintirirrable without challenging the LOC issued agairl!;t the Petitionr rr bv the originator.,,
Miscellerne oLrs petitions, if any, pending strall :;ta.rd r:losed.
SD/- I). PAT)IV ANABHA REDDY ASSII;TAryTREGISTRAR / //TRUE COPY' (t) / SI:C]]ON OFFICER To, 1. One CC t,: SlRl,/t:DULA CTH|TB4LEI!HA, Advocak: [OFLtCrl 2 Qle.99 !,, SRt u rvANGL|LAL (CENiRAI dbVEHrvnrr,r.rr COUNSEL) IOt LICI 3. Two CD C)orire: BN GJPl <'<
I I
HIGH COURT
DATED:31 lA7'2023
ORDER
WP.No.19686 of 2023
,l ,18 STA t'5
f'
( (
v
a 1 !, .Ufi I$IJ I-z
,l-''
.'. 1!', )
'.\ l
DISMISSING'|II.IE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT CC STS
v>
-)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to direct the respondents to remove the List for Contempts (LOC) against the petitioner to allow his international travel.
Whether the Writ Petition is maintainable without challenging the underlying LOC issued by the originator.
Kollipara Aravinda Babu
The Union of India, Ministry of Home Affairs
The Bureau of Immigration
SUREPALLT NANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
