The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and Section 151 CPC for non-prosecution, noting the absence of a representation on multiple occasions despite previous listing dates.
None. Petition and pending miscellaneous applications dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e6 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 18759 OF 2023
Between:
K. Shyam Kumar, S/o K.Bhaskar, aged about 45 years, Pvt. Service, R/o.H.No.9117, first floor, Venkateshwar Nagar, Malkajgiri, Hyderabad-s00 047.
.,...PETITIONER
AND
.....RESP.NDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents No.2 and 3 on the representation dated 26-04-2023 by not taking actionagainst the Respondents Nos. 4 and 5 as highly illegal and arbitrary.
|.A.NO:1 OF 2023
Petition Under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court mbybe pleased to direct the respondent Nos.2 and 3 toprovide interim protectionto the petitioner and his wife form the respondents Nos.4 and 5pending disposal of the mainwrit petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI AHMED KHAN Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : AGP FORHOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 & 5: -- The Court made the following ORDER
/
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.18739 of2o23
ORDER:
When the matter was taken up on two earlier occasions i.e., on O5.O9.2O23 and 2O.O9.2O23, there was no representation for the petitioner. Even today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the writ petition.
Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand
closed. There shal1 be no order as to costs.
SD/- G. SIREESHA ASSISTA!.IT REGISTRAR czlj^ SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:1111012023
ORDER
WP.No.18759 of 2023
DISMISSING THE W.P
FOR NON - PROSECUTION
WITHOUT COSTS.
cw K,
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for lack of representation by the petitioner.
K. Shyam Kumar
The State of Telangana
The Inspector of Police, P.S. Malkajgiri
The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda
K. Sashi Kiran
K. Vijaya Laxmi
C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
