Dismissed

Sagar Cricket Club Rep. by its President a. Naveen Kumar v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh. Rep. by Secretary

Telangana HC10 Feb 2023WP/18695/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order dismisses WP No. 18695 of 2010 filed by Sagar Cricket Club as infructuous. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause of action was extinct, leading the Court to dispose of the matter without adjudication on merits.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous without costs.

What the court decided

Sagar Cricket Club Rep. by its President a… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³³⁰³ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Speciat Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 18695 0F 2010

¶7

Between:

¶8

Sagar cricket club Rep. by its president A. Naveen Kumar, s/o. pandurangarao, Business, No. 16-2-sdt711; Akbar aagh,-Maialpei nvJeraoao

¶9

..PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The Government of Andhra pradesh. Rep. by Secretary, Home Secretarait Building Hyderabad

¶12

2 The Government of A.P, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Finance uepanment, Secretarait Building, Hyderabad'

¶13

3 If'-".Coyt^{of AndhraPradesh,.Rep by its Secretary} to, Sports and^youths Affairs Department, Secretarait HyOeiaOaO

¶14

4 The District Collector, Hyderabad District at Nampally, Hyderabad The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Lakdika pul, Hyderabad

¶15

t) The Director of Vigilance & Enforcement, Government of A.p, Hyderabad

¶16

7 The Director Central Bureau of lnvestigation, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad

¶17

8 The Hyde-rabad Cricket Association, Rep. by its president, Gymkhana Ground, Secunderabad

¶18

I The Commissioner of Police Hyderabad District, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad

¶19

...RESPONDENTS

¶20

Petition under Article 226 ol the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumslances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High cou( may be pleased to lssue an appropriate writ order or direction more particurarry in the nature of "Mlandamus" declaring the action of Respondents.l to 7 and g in not taking punitive and corrective action against the office bearers and Executive committee members of the Respondent No. g from 2004 to 2008 as arbitrary,

¶21

,;{+itlt-7-i-

¶22

illegal, unlust and ,erng in violation of the provisions of flte Cols 91 Criminal procedure and oppr sed to public policy and public interest arrr l fo - consequential directic ns to the Re pondents.

¶23

t.A. NO : 1 OF 2010('VPMP. NO: 2 3644 0F 2010)

¶24

[)etition unde Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci.,.:umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the Hiqh Court may be pleased direct tre 1st and^g h Respondents herein to submit an Acticr Tzken Report on the re;rresentation lated 28-5-2010 within two wer:ks d s;[rosal of this writ petition.

¶25

Counsel for the Pet :ioner: SRl. L RAVICHANDER

¶26

Counserl for the Res )ondent No. 2: GP FOR FINANCE & pLt,NNlNG

¶27

Counse,l for the Res :ondent No.3: GP FOR SPORTS

¶28

Counselforthe Res rondentNo.4 and 5: Gp FOR REVENUE

¶29

Counselforthe Res )ondent No. 1,6 and 9: Gp FOR HOME

¶30

Counsel for the Res )ondent No.8: SRl. B ADINARAYANA R/\C,

¶31

The Cor.rrt made the following: ORDER

¶32

I r I I I I

¶33

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO

¶34

WRIT PETITION No.18595 of 2O1O

¶35

ORDER:

¶36

When the matter is lakcn up lor hearing, Ms. Swecha, learned counsel, representing Sri L. Ravichander, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication

¶37

In view of the above submission, this writ petition IS dismissed as infructuous.

¶38

Miscellaneous applications, pcnding if any, shall stand

¶39

closed

¶40

To,

¶41

SD/. G. SIREESHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶42

//TRUE COPY//

¶43

SECTIO ICER

¶44

9n"^{CC to Sri. L Ravichander,Advocate} tOpUCl 2. Iw.o CCs to Gp for Finance ana ptannlnd, ff ilfr"'Court tor State of Telangana, [OUT]

¶45

Iwo^{CCs to- Gp ior Sports,} High Court for State of I

¶46

TJ GJPI

¶47

i'l1;lttrTitn:#r'['I;5;*',ilr$g[g"nflirndll#,n7. Two CD Copies

HIGFI COUR'-

DATED:1 010',t12023

OREIER

WP.No.1869!; of 2010

.-:,
aa Sl Af c.
1\ ,J*
./,;_
/,'
l't,' I
ll^
1r filB 2[23
lr ,
\ ,1" /
. i

¶53

DISN'IISSING THE WRIT PETITION

¶54

AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.

¶55

?n
2-
28l"l

¶56

$r^t

Sagar Cricket Club Rep. by its President a. Naveen Kumar v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh. Rep. by Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Sagar Cricket Club Rep. by its President a. Naveen Kumar v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh. Rep. by Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Mendem Sujatha Vs The State of Telangana

Gundu Narasimha Rao Vs The State of Telangana and 4 others

Sammaka sarakka Alaya Abhivrudhi Committe Vs The State of Telangana

Maisangari Mohan Vs Vijaya Rani

Suprabhat College of Engineering and Technology Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Smt. Nazjeemunnisa , Najmabegum And 4 Others Vs The Principle Secretary And 7 Others