The High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking regularization of the petitioner's service as a driver. The petition was disposed of as abated following a submission that the petitioner had expired.
No regularization order or costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3304 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 18640 OF 2013
Between:
Ch.Sathi Reddy S/o Yella Reddy, Driver, Hyderabad-2 Depot, E.211266, H.No.4-9-361/1, RTC Colony, Hayathnagar, Hyderabad- 501 505.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith, theHigh Court maybe pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction morepa(icularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring theproceedings No.P6/97(1y07-RR dated 20.07.2009 of the 4th Respondent regularizing thepetitionerin the postof driver with effect from 0'l .07.2009 while the similarlyplaced daily wagedrivers selectedpursuant to Notification of theyear1999 were regularizedon completion of 240 working days, is arbitrary, unjust, contraryto Memorandumof Settlement dated 27.03.1997 U/Sec.12(3) of l.D-Act,1947, contraryto APSRTC Employees' (Recruitment) Regulations, 1966, APSRTC Employees'(Service) Regulations, 1964, discriminatory and in violation of Article'14, Article16 and Article 21 of lhe Constitution of lndia and liable to be setasideconsequently directthe
respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner in the post of driver with effect from 01-O1-2004, with all consequential benefits including difference of pay t.A. NO: 10F2013 WPMP. NO: 22771 OF 2013)
Petition under Section'l 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant an interim diretiion to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization with effect from 01-01-2004, pending disposal of the writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. A. c. SAWANARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR TRANSPORT
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 5.: SRl. N. VASUDEVA REDDY
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.1 864O of 2O13
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Iearned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner expired and therefore, the writ petition stands abated.
In view of the above submission, the writ petition is
dismissed as abated. No costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand
closed.
SD/-N.RAJA,GOPAL ASSISTANTBEGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII qD SECTION OFFICER
To,
BM
SW
HIGH COURT
DATED:2010612023
)
==-=-=:jiAla'O/
f
o
Il
i 1\ \N
,) I
,,,
r 6;SP P.1
ORDER
WP.No.18640 of 2013
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS ABATED WITHOUT COSTS Crs
LcPr P< rl^{>r (r >,9 (o
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition stands abated due to the death of the petitioner.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Ch.Sathi Reddy
The Government of Andhra Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation
Regional Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C.
Personnel Officer, A.P.S.R.T.C.
Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C.
NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
