A writ petition challenging a suspension order against a lecture by a college was dismissed as infructuous due to the petitioner's own submission that the cause of action did not survive for adjudication.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABADI (Special Originat Jurisdictiod)
3304 ]
MONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
Between:
WRIT PETITION NO: 1534 OF 2013
Dr. Dongari Venkat Ram, son of rate Muthi Lingaiah, aged about 56 years. serection Grade Lecturer in Economics, Sri Venkareswa[ D.ba;c;lege, 5,i.v"bdt]i.iri,iiig atH.No.1-6-102t3t3t2,Road No.5, sri Vidya Nagai, Suryapet, riaigo"dibiiilcr.'-"'
AND
...PETITIONER
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Ariicle 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, decraring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing impugned suspension order vide Rc.No.126lsVClEstt.t2o12 dated 2g.0g.20i2 and extending the same vide Proceedings Rc.234lEstt.tsvcr2o12 dared 2g.12.2012, as iilegar, arbitrary and against Rule 79(3)(b), 79(4) and 79(5) of A.p. Education Act and violative of principles of natural justice and also against Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the constitution of lndia and consequen y set aside the same directing the 1st and 4th respondents to permit the petitioner to join duty as Selection Grade Lecturer in Economics, forthwith;
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP. NO: 1851 OF 2013)
Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in :;upport of the petrtion, the High Court may be pleased lo suspend the impugneC order vide Rc No.'l 26 / SVC/ Estt. 12012 dated 28.08.2012 issued by the 1st rer;pondent as extended vide Proceedings Rc.234lEstt./SVC/ 2012 daled 28.12.2012, consequently direct the respondents 1 and 4 to permit the petitioner to resume cuties as Lecturer (Economics), pending disposal of the writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. P RAVI SHANKER
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI V.V.N. NARAYANA RAO
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.2 & 3: GP FOR EDUCATION
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.4 & 5: SRI P. VENKATESWAR RAO
The Gourt made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
W.P.No.l534 of 2o13
ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the said submission, the writ petition is
dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if
any, shall stand closed.
SD/-V.KAVITHA
ASSTSTATyI,REGTSTRAR secl#lr oFFrcER
//TRUE COPY//
To,
t:
HIGH COURT
DATED:1910612023
ORDER
W.P.No.1534 of 2013
5{aI€ I A-
a
')lc \5 \\ ls I
\o
,. _/ a.
vc,. .,v'i;
('I r r-"-':c r"),,z
-t.---:,'
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
t&
>9
1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr. Dongari Venkat Ram
Sri Venkateswara College (Grant-in-Aid Institution)
State of Andhra Pradesh Higher Education Department
Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Education
V.Nageswara Rao
M. Shyam Sunder Rao
NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
