Dismissed

Abimalla Kasthuri, Nalgonda Dt. and 3 Othrs v. State of Telangana, Rep. by P.P., Hyd and Anr.

Telangana HC14 Jun 2023CRLP/1250/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C was dismissed as infructuous without costs. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the cause of action did not survive, which the respondent State did not oppose. The court recorded the submission and dismissed the petition consequently.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition No. 1250 of 2015 dismissed as infructuous including any pending miscellaneous petitions.

Abimalla Kasthuri, Nalgonda Dt. and 3 Othrs Vs… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

3299 ] HIGTI GOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABO'[

¶2

WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶5

Bet	CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12500F2015 ween:-
1)	Abimalla asthuri,Wo.JanardhanRao, Agedabo 60 years, Occ:FlouseWife, R/o.Huzu arVillage& Mandal, NalgondaDi rict) S
2)	AbimallaJanardhahRao, S/o. VenkataChary, Agedabout 65 years, Occ:Potiticlan, Rl/o.Huzurnagar Village& Mandal, Nalgonda District)
s)	AbimallaChinnaKoteswar, S/o. JanardhanRao, Aged about 28 years, Occ:Stucient, R/o.Vidyanagar,RTCXRoad,l{yderabad.
4)	AbimallaAbhilash,S/o. JanardhanRao, Aged about 26 years, Occ:Student, R/o.Vidyanagar,RTC X Road, l{yderabad. ...Petitione I\ND	rs/Accused 2 to5.
1)	l'heState ofTelanganarep.by its PublicProsecutor High Court of Judicature at, Hyderabad. FortheState of Telangana and StateofAndhraPradesh.
2)	AbbimerllaSumalatha,Wo.VijayKumar, Occ:Hr)u6ewife,Rl/o.H.No.3-83/4, RamaleryamStreet, Bheemaram, Hanamkonda, WaranglalDistrict.-506015.	..RespondenU Com lainant.

¶6

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the C.C.No.705 ot 2014 on the file of the Hon,ble lAdditional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Warangal.

¶7

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(C R -PMP. NO: 1353 OF 2015)

¶8

Petition unrler Siection 482 of Cr.P.C praying :hat irr the circumstances stated in the N4emor rndum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, tlre Fligh Court may be pleased to stay al frrrther proceedings in C.C.No.705 of 2)'4 on the file of the Hon'ble I Addl. Jurli- al First Class [,4agistrate at Warangal irrcludirg appearance of the petitioner s / ac r;r sed No.2 to 5.

¶9

This Pet tiort ro ring on for hearrng,upon peruling tro lvl3morandum of Grounds of Orinrrr rl Petition and upon hearing the . rgu.nents of Sri P. Vishnuvardlarra F:eddy, Advocate for the Petitionr--rs ard the Public Prosecutor on l)ehal of the Respondent No.1 and none appe,,rrecl either person nor in Advocate for tl 3 Respondent No.2. The Court made the ollowing: ORDER

¶10

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL

¶11

CRIMINAL PETITION No.1250 of 2015

¶12

ORDER:

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioners/accused Nos.2 to 5 submits that the cause in the Criminal Petition does not survive, therefore no further orders are required and hence ' seeks to dismiss the same as infructuous

¶14

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent/ State is present and takes no objection to the same.

¶15

Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent/ State, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶16

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this

¶17

criminal petition, shall al^qo gtqnd d!gg1!sse{.

¶18

SD/- T. JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR LAD //TRUE COPY'

¶19

SECTION OFFICER

¶20

To,

¶21

I The I Additional Judicial First Class lrlagistrate at Warangal. 2 The Station House Officer, WPS Urban Police Station, Warangal Urban. J One CC to SRl. P. VISHNUVARDHANA REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 4 Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 5. Two CD Copies CHR

HIGH COUR]

DATED:141061?.023

ORDER

CRL.P.No.12l'0 of 2015

¶26

./---
5T ATE' o
l,o I i+(
-v
o
i\It M
11 >
.<br>t-
). :g/

¶27

DISMlSSING^'"HE CRL.P. AS INFRUCTI.IOUS WITHOUT CO STS

¶28

('')
.7:'
1)
h' )
F
I
E)L>

Abimalla Kasthuri, Nalgonda Dt. and 3 Othrs v. State of Telangana, Rep. by P.P., Hyd and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abimalla Kasthuri, Nalgonda Dt. and 3 Othrs v. State of Telangana, Rep. by P.P., Hyd and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.S.M. Bhupathi, Sec-Bad and 2 Otrs., Vs State of Telangana, Rep Pp and Anr.

R. Anupa, Hyd and Anr. Vs State of Telangana, Rep. by P.P., Hyd

Mr.Sanjay Saraogi Vs the State of a.P., and Another

Smt Ash Mishra and Another Vs the State of Telangana and Another

Yata Venkat Reddy, Khammam Dt and 2 Otrs., Vs State of Telangana, Rep Pp and Anr.

Syed Yahiya Rabbani Vs The State of Telangana Rep. by its Secretary