Supreme Court bench dismissed a criminal petition as infructuous upon the concession by counsel and confirmation that the underlying calendar case had already been disposed of by the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t32es I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 16585OF 2014
Between:
| M.S.M.BhupathiS/o.Meenakshi,Sundaram, Ageclabout45years,Occ:Managing Director, IrlatNo.20l,GangaPlaza,Vasavi'Nagar, Karkhana,Secunderabad |
|---|
| 2.M.PalaniS/o.Meenakshi Sundaram, Agedabout42years,.Occ:MdnAger; FlatNo.201,GangaPlaza,Vasavi Nagar, Karkhana,Secunderabad. |
| 3.S.SrinivasS/o.S.Ram ChanderRao, Agedabout31years,Occ: Cashier, IrlatNo.2O1,GangaPlaza,Vasavi Nagar, Karkhana,Secundbrabad. ..Petitioners/AccusedNo.1to3 |
| AND iJ |
| 1.TheState'ofTelangana. Rep.byitsFlublicProsecutor, High CourtofT.S., Hyderabad |
| 2.ChandraShekarAzad, .Agcdabout43years,Occ:Business, R/o.B-12/A,Phase-I,IDA, Jeedimetla,Hyderabad. Respondents |
Petition under sect on 482 of clr r' (l praying that in the circumstances stated in the IMemorandunr of Grounds :,f Cr minal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the CC.No. 5tr i of 2014 on the fitr-. of the Hon,ble Il lvletropolitan Magistra.e, ( fo r Ra ilv,,a ys ) at Secunderabad, Hyd erabad.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2014(CRLPMP. NO 17876 0F 20141
Petition under Section 482 r:{ Cr.P C praying that in the circumstances stated in the lt4emorandum of Gro,, rris of Criminal petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedrngs pursuant to the C.C.No.5b1 of 2014 on the file of the Hon'ble ll li,4etropolitan Magistrate (for Rail ways), at Secunderabad, Hyder,:bad
This Petition coming c,n for hearing.upon perusing lhe Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri B SHIVA KUMAR Advocate for the Petitioner and lhe Public Prosecutor for the state of relangana on behalf of the Respcndent No.1 and None appeared forthe Respondent No.2
The Court made the following: ORDER
I I
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V"VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION No.1 6585 of20r4
ORDER;
Leaned counsel for the petitioners/accusei Nos. i to 3 submits that the cause in the Criminat petition <ioes not survive as the Calendar Case has been disposed of on the file of 1 II Metropolitan Magistrate Judge for Railways, -Secundei:abadand the nature of disposal was contested_ acqulttal. Therefore, no further orders are required and hence seeks to dismiss the Criminal petition as infructuous.
2
Mrsce.iiair eo,-rs ceI:l ".-, s :f an' pcnclinq in t-his
criminai petiti)n. sh:ril stirl,ri rii;sed
//TRUECOPY//
Sd/.N.SRIHARI ASSISTANTREGISTRAR (.tf,
SECTIONOFFICER
To, 1 rhe l MetroporiranMasistrar{'.i,fJ5:i]#:il,'Jfl':S:::fli'.l'..ifl;Hvderabad 2 ni-gn co"trorihe state or 3 Tl,?S? '3,?;f:H113'?ibt'b'uioil 4 l::tet{Slt"S'lffJ?t,-lAR AdvocatetoPUCl tr Two CDCoPies' KKS
HIGH COURT
DATED:1310612023
ORDER
CRLP.No.16585 of 2014
t lttE S 14
(
(s(
q 1s rtlttoa
o2
3
* .!'
l-11'':;)?,
DISMISSING THE CRLP AS INFRUCTUOUS
(Y?
M.S.M.Bhupathi and Others
The State of Telangana
Chandra Shekar Azad
E.V.Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
