Disposed

T. Sreedevi v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC22 Dec 2023WP/1732/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition, the petitioner challenged her allotment to the Mahabubabad District instead of Hanamkonda. The respondents produced proceedings rejecting her earlier appeal. The High Court allowed the petitioner liberty to challenge the newly recorded proceedings without costs.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to the petitioner to challenge the proceedings dated 31.03.2022.

T. Sreedevi Vs The State of Telangana — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³³⁰¹ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO:^'1732 OF 2022

¶7

Between:

¶8

T. Sreedevi, Wo. V. Venkata Ramana, aged about 5l^years, Occ ; School Assistant (ARTS), Government High School, Rangashaipet, Khila Warangal, Warangal District, Fi./o. H.No.1-1-717i1, Siddarthanagar - NlT, Hanamkonda District- 50600.

¶9

.....PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶12

The Commissioner and Director of School Education, Govemment of Telangana State, 1"t Floor, C Block, Saifabad, Hyderabad.

¶13

The District Educational Officer, Warangal, Warangal District, Telangana State

¶14

The District Edtrcational Ofiicer, f{anamkonda, Hanamkonda District, Telangana State.

¶15

The District Educational Officer, Mahabubabdd,^{Mahabubabad District,} Telangana State.

¶16

.....RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^{praying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{fitedtherewith,the High Court may be} pleased to issue. a writ order or direction especially one in the nature of writ of mandamus a)To declare the action of^{the respondentsin preparing the seniority} list for the purpose of allocation of employees^{to the local cadre on the basis of} seniority in the School Assistant cadre^{only without taking into considerationof} her place of study and^place of initial^{appointmentto the feeder cadre and} allotted this^p€titioner to newly^{formed Mahabubabad District insteadof her} native Hanamkonda district as^{per her place of study and nativity is as illegal,}

¶18

arbitrary, unconstitutional and against the section 7 and I of G.o Ms. No.124 GA (SPF-MC) Depirrtment, Dated 30/08/2018 and consequenfly declare that this petitioner is belongs to local cadre of Hanamkonda as per her place of study and.nativity and direct the respondents to allot the petitaoner to the Hanamkonda District as per r;ection 7 of G.O Ms. No.1 24 GA (SPF-MC) Department, Date 30l08l2o1\ whir;h is issued under^presidential orders with in a stipulated time and b)Further dr:clare that the Action of the respondents in not disposing of the appeals filed by the petitioner and insisting the petitioner to report to the newly allocated/allotte<l districts without being disposal of her apple is illegal and arbitrary.

¶19

|.A.NO:1 OF 202ir-

¶20

Petition Urrder section 1sl cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respcrndents to pass appropriate orders on the appeals Dated 2411212021 filed lry the petitioner.

¶21

Counsel for the [,etitioner : SRt A.V.V.S.BHUJANGA RAO

¶22

Counsel for the Flespondents : GP FOR SERVICES - lll

¶23

The Court made lhe following ORDER

¶24

I I

¶25

THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE PULLA I(ARTHIK

¶26

WRIT PETITION No.1732 of 2022

¶27

ORDER:

¶28

Aggrieved by the action of respondents in allotting the petitioner to Mahabubabad District instead of Hanumakonda District, ignoring her seniorit5r, the present Writ Petition is filed.

¶29

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Pleader for Services - I appearing on behalf of respondents No. I to 5 has placed on record a copy of the proceedings uide Memo No. Spl/ Secretary Peshi / 2O2 I - la7, dated 31.03.2022, and submitted that in compliance of the interim order passed by this Court on 17.01.2022, tlre respondents have disposed of the appeal liled by the petitioner by duly rejecting her case

¶30

At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner has sought Iiberty to challenge the proceedings, dated 3r.o3.2022.

¶31

¶32

hr view of the submissions made by the respective counsel, the Writ Petition is disposed of granting libert5z to the petitioner to challenge the proceedings, dated 31.O3.t1,O22, if she so desires. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶33

IV.iscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶34

SD/. T.JAYASR E ASSISTANT REGIST R //TRUE COPY//

¶35

SECTION OFFICER

¶36

¶37

J!,e^{etnc pal S.ecretary, Higher Education Department, Secretariat,} State of r erangan:l at Hyderabad.

¶38

The Comrnissioner and Director of School Education, Govemment of Telangan:r State, lstFtoor, C abct, SaifiuaJ, ivo"iiuio.

¶39

The Distrit;t Educational Officer, Warangal, Wardngal District, Telangana State.

¶40

The Distrir:t Educational Officer, Hanamkonda, Hanamkonda District, Telanganu State.

¶41

The Distrirrt Educationar officer, Mahabubabad, Mahabubabad District, Telangane State.

¶42

Two ccs ro GP FoR SERVTCES -ilr, High court for the state of rerangana at Hyderabarl. [OUT]

¶43

One CC to Sri A.V.V.S.Bhujanga Rao, Advocate tOpUCl 8. Two CD Copies

SA GJ

HIGH COI'RT

DATED:22 11212023

ORDER

WP.No.1732 ot 2022

( 1 HE STA
o
(
o-)
2 0 FtB 202t
a?
* D€spetcH gO *

¶51

DISPOSING I)F THE W.P

¶52

WITHOUT COSTS.

¶53

$
/
Gqi4
68-

T. Sreedevi v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T. Sreedevi v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G. Srinu Vs The State of Telangana

Smt.Ch.Srivani M.a.(English) Vs The State of Telangana

P. Venkateshwarlu Vs The State of Telangana

K.Ramulu Vs State of Telangana

Bhudevi Padmashalli Vs The State of Telangana and 2 others

B. Thirupathaiah Vs The State of Telangana