Disposed

G. Srinu v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC21 Dec 2023WP/32519/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petitioners, contract lecturers, filed petitions seeking regularization of services under the 2016 guidelines. The court directed the second respondent to dispose of the regularization proposal sent by the third respondent within eight weeks without going into merits.

What did the court decide?

Direct respondent No.2 to pass appropriate orders on the regularization proposal sent by respondent No.3 within 8 weeks of receipt of this order.

G. Srinu Vs The State of Telangana — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³³⁰¹ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶6

WRIT PETITION NOS: 32497 32519 32576 32580^{AND 328620F 2023}

¶7

W.P.NO: 32497 OF 2023

¶8

Between:

¶9

Smt. CH.Srivani, tt/.A.(English ),^{D/o.CH.Durgaiah, Aged about 36 years,Occ.} Contract Lecturer in Englis h, Presently Working at Govt., Polytechnic lvlaheshwaram

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana, Rep. by^{its Principal Secretary. to the Finance} Department, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Secretariat, Saifabad,^Hyderabad.

¶13

The State of Telangana, Rep by^{its Principal Secretary to theHig_her} Education (TechniCal Education),Department,^{Dr. B.R.Ambedkar Secretariat,} Saifabad, Hyderabad.

¶14

The Commiisioner, Technical Education^{Department, Stateof Telangana,} Nampally, Hyderabad.

¶15

The Reg-iondl Joint Director, Department^{of Technical Education, Government} of Telangana State.

¶16

The Gov-ernment Polytechnic^{for Women,Repby its Principal, Govt.,} PolytechnicMaheshwaram,RangaReddyDistrict.

¶17

...RES'ONDENTS

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution^{of lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filedtherewith, the High Courtmay be} pleased to issue a writ order or direction, more^{particularly one in the natureof} writ of mandamus declaring the action of^{the 2nd respondentin non-regularizing} the services of the^{petitioner as English Lecturer in pursuanceof the proceedings} sent by the 3rd respondent to the 2nd^{respondent vide proceedingsFile No.CTE-} EST2/SMSL/ 2O12O22-ESTABLISHMENT-2CTE-Part^{(1) dated 0l-08-2023in} pursuance of the G.O.Ms. No. 16, FINANCE^{(HRM I) DEPARTMENT, dated 26-} 02-2016 and issued^guide lines^{vide circularMemo No. 308-,4/51/A3/HRM-} 1t2014, dated 26-02-016 on^par at^{par similar situated persons regularized the} services vide G.O.Ms No 31, Higher^{Education (TE)Departmentdated 01-05-}

¶19

2023asanillegal,arbitrary,discriminatory,unjust'unfair'unreasonable' whimsical,^{non-application of mind, unlawful, U nconStitutionaland in violation of} PrinciplesofNaturalJusticeandinviolationofArticlel4,l6and2.lofthe Constitution of^{lndia and alsoagainstthe catenaof judgmentsof thisHonble} Court and an^{Apex Courtand set-aside the same and consequently' directthe} respondentstoregularizetheservicesofthepetitionerasEnglishLecturerin pursuance of the 3rd^{respondentsentproposalto the 2nd respondent' vide} proceedings File No CTE-EST2/S[\il^{SLI2OI2O22-ESTABLISHMENT-2CTE-ParI(1)} dated 01-08-2023^{in pursuance of the G O'Ms' No '16' FINANCE (HRM'|)} DEPARTMENT ,^{dated 26-02-20',l6and issuedguide lines vide circular Memo No'} 308-A/51/A3/HRM-^{1t2014, dated26-02-2016on par at par similar situated} persons regularized the services^{vide G O'Ms No 31, HigherEducation(TE)} Department dated^{0'l -05-2023 with consequentialbenef its'}

¶20

IA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶21

Petition under^{section 151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances stated} In the affidavit filed^{in support of the petition,the HighCourt may be pleasedto} direct the respondents^{to continuethe petitionertill regularizethe servicesof the} petitioner as English Lecturer^{in pursuance of the proposal sent the 3rd} respondent to the^{2nd respondentvide ProceedingsFile No- CTE-} EST2/SMSL/20t2022-EsTABLISH[/ENT-2CTE-Part(1)dated.01-08-2023in pursuanceoftheG.o.Ms.No..l6,F|NANCE(HRM.|)DEPARTMENT,dated.2602-2016andissuedguidelinesvidecircularMemoNo.30s-A/51/A3/HR[I. 112014, daled. 26-02-2016^{on par at par similarsituated persons regularized the} servicesvideG.o.MsNo3l,HigherEducat|on(TE)Departmentdated.01.052023 forthwith.

¶22

IA NO: 2 OF 2023

¶23

Petition under Section^{15,1 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances Stated} in the affidavit filed^{in support of the petition,the HighCourt may be pleasedto} direct the lstand^{the 2nd respondentsto consider the representationof the} petitioner, dtd.12-05-2023 and to^{regularizethe services of the petitioner as} English Lecturer^{in pursuanceof the proposal sent the 3rd respondent to the 2nd}

¶24

respondent vide Proceedings File No.^{CTE-EST2/ SMSL/ 2Ol 2022-} ESTABLISHMENT-2CTE-Part(1), dated.^{01-08-2023 inpursuance of the} G.O Ms No.^'16, FINANCE^{(HRtvl l) DEPARTMENT,dated.26-02-2016 and} issued^guide lines vide circular^{Memo No. 308-A/51/A3/HRlVl4/20'14,dated. 26-} 02-2016 on^par at^par similar^{situated persons regularizedthe servicesvide} G.O.Ms No 31, Higher Education^{(TE) Department dated 01-05-2023 forthwith-}

¶25

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI^{PRABHAKARCHIKKUDU} Counsel forthe Respondents: GP^FORSERVICESI

¶26

W.P.NO: 32519 OF 2023

¶27

Between:

¶28

G. Srinu, M.Sc(Mathematics), S/o.^{G.Ramulu,Aged about35. years,Occ} Contract Lecturbr in Mathematics,^{Presently Working at Model Residential} Polytechnic(G[VlRP) at Manuguru,^{Badradri Kothegudem District}

¶29

...PETITIONER

¶30

AND

¶31

'1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary lo.the.Finance Department, Dr. B.R.Ambedkar^{Secretariat, Saifabad,Hyderabad.}

¶32

Z. Th6 State oi Telangana, Rep by^{its Principal Secretary to the Technical} Education, Dr. B.R.Ambedkar Secretariat,^{Saifabad, Hyderabad.}

¶33

The Commissioner,^{Technical Education Department, Stateof Telangana,} Nampally, Hyderabad.

¶34

The Regiondl Joint Director,^{Departmentof Technical Education, Government} of Telangana State.

¶35

The Gov-ernment Model^{Residential Polytechnic(GMRP), Rep by its Principal,} Model Residential Polytechnic(GMRP)^{at Manuguru, BadradriKothegudem} District'

¶36

...RESP.NDENTS

¶37

Petition under Article 226 ol^{the Constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in^{the affidavit filedtherewith,the High Courtmay be} pleased to issue a writ order or direction, more^{particularly one in the nature of writ} of mandamus declaring^{the action of the 2ndrespondentin non-reg ularizing the} services of the^petitioner as^{Mathematics Lecturer in pursuance of the proceedings} sent by the 3rd respondent^{to the 2nd respondentvide proceedingsFile No.CTE-} EST2/SMSL/201 2022- ESTABLISHMENT-2CTE-Part^{(1) dated.01-08-2023in} pursuance of the G O.Ms. No.16, FINANCE^{(HRM.l) DEPARTMENT,dated} 1t2014, dated 26-02-2016^{on par at par similarsituated persons regularized the}

¶38

services vide G-o.Ms^{No 31, Higher Education (TE) Department dated 0110512023} as an illegal, arbitrary,^{discriminatory,un.iust, unfair,unreasonable, whimsical'} non-application of^{mind, unlawful,u nconstitutionaland in violationof Principles of} Natural Justice and^{in violation of Article14,16 and 21 0f the constitutionof lndia} and also against^{the catena of} ludgments^{of this Honourablecourt and an Apex} court and set-aside the^{same and consequently,direct the respondentsto} regularize the services^{of the petitioneras Mathematics Lecturerin pursuanceof} the 3rd respondent^{sent proposal to the 2nd respondent, vide proceedings File No} c I E-EST2/SM SLl2Ot^{2022-ESTABLISHMENT-2CTE-ParI(1) dated0110812023 in} pursuance of the G.O.Ms. No.16, FINANCE^{(HRM.l) DEPARTMENT, daled 26-02-} 2016 and issued^{guide lines vide circular Memo No.308-A/51/A3/HRM-112014,} daled 26t02t2016 on^{par at par similar situated persons regularizedthe services} vide G.O.Ms No.31,^{Higher Education(TE) Department,dated.01/05/2023with} consequential benefits.

¶39

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶40

Petition under section^{15'1 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct} the respondents to continue^{the petitionertill regularizationof the servicesof the} petitioner as Mathematics Lecturer in^{pursuance of the proposalsent the 3rd} respondent to the 211d^{respondentvide ProceedingsFile NoCTE-} EST2/SMSL/2Ol 2022-ESTABLISHIvIENT-2CTE-Part(1)^{dated. 0110812023in} pursuance of the G.O.tvls. No. 16,^{FINANCE(HRM.l)DEPARTMENT, dated'} 26102t2016 and issued^{guide lines vide circular Memo No. 308-A/ 51/ A3/HRM-} 1t2014, daled. 26t02t2016 on^{par at par similar situated persons regularizedthe} services vide G.O.Ms^{No 31, Higher Education(TE) Department, dated'} 0110512023 forthwith.

¶41

lA NO: 2 OF 2023

¶42

Petition under section 15'1 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct} the^'1st and the 2nd resoondents to consider the^{representationof the petitioner,} dt:12105t2023 and to^{regularize the services of the petitioneras Mathematics}

¶43

Lecturer in^{pursuance of the proposal sent the 3rd respondentto the 2nd} respondent vide^{ProceedingsFile No.CTE-EST2/SMSLl20l2022-} ESTABLISHMENT-2CTE-ParI(1),dated:oltoSt2o23inpursuanceoftheG.o.Ms. No. 16, FINANCE^{(HRM.l) DEPARTMENT,dated:2610212016and issuedguide} tines vide circular^{Memo No. 308-4/51/A3/HRM-l/2014, dated. 26-02-2016on} paratparsimilarsituatedpersonsregularizedtheservicesvideG.o.MsNo3l, Higher Education^{(TE) Departmentdated 01-05-2023forthwith'}

¶44

Counsel for the^{Petitioner:SRI PRABHAKARCHIKKUDU} Counsel forthe^{Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES-I}

¶45

W.P.NO: 32576^{0F 2023}

¶46

Between:

¶47

P. Venkateshwarlu,^{M.Sc (Maths),S/o Yesu, Aged about36 YearsCaste} "Lecturer iri' Mathematics - Working at. Government bC, Oc". Contract FotytecnnicKothagudem,Distrrct.BadradriKothegudem ...pETlTlONER

¶48

AND

¶49

1 '. The State of^{Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretaryto,the,Finance} Deoartment. Dr.B.R Ambedkar^{Secretariat, Saifabad' Hyderabao'}

¶50

Z. ifre State oi Telangana.^{Rep by its Principle.Secretary to the Hrgher.} - iii"rii.ii,d"tiini"ir eou"riioni, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar s6cretariat, saifabad, Hvderabad.

¶51

3 ifr;g[ffiissioner,^{Technicat Education Department, stateof Telangana,} NamPallY, HYderabad.

¶52

+. i[" ft"gionitltint^{Olr""tor, Departmentof Technical Education, Government} of Telangana State.

¶53

s. in"-ctv"ernment^{polytechnic, Repby its prrncrpal,GovernmentPolytechnic,} KothegudemDistrict,BadradrrKothegudem,^lS

¶54

...RES'ONDENTS

¶55

Petition under^{Article226 of lhe constitutionof lndia praying that in the} circumstances^{stated in the affidavit filed therewith,the High Court maybe} pleased to iSSUe a writ^{order or direction, more particularlyone in the nature of writ} of mandamus^{declaringthe action of the 2nd respondentin non-reg ularizing the} services of the^{petitioner as Mathematics Lecturer in pursuance of the proceedings} sent by the^{3rd respondent to the 2nd respondentvide proceedingsFile No'CTE-} EST2/SMSL/2ol2o22.Es:ABL|SHIVIENT-2CTE.ParI(1),dated.01-08-2023in pursuance of the G.O.Ms.^{No. 16, FINANCE(HRM I) DEPARTMENT' dated26-} 02-2016 and^{issuedquide lines vide circular Memo No. 308-4/51/A3/HRM-l/2014'} dated26_02-0l6onparatparsimilarsituatedpersonsregularizedtheServices

¶56

vide G.O.Ms No.31, Higher Education^{(TE) Departmentdated. 01-05-2023as an} illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory,^{unjust,unfair, unreasonable,whimsical'non-} application of mind, unlawful,^{u nconstitutional and in violation of Principles of} Natural^justice and in violation^{of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the constitution of lndia} and also against the catena of^{judgmentsof this Hon'bleCourt and an ApexCourt} and consequently, direct the^{respondentsto regularize the servicesof the} petitioner as Mathematics Lecturer in^pursuance of the^{3rd respondentsent} proposal to the 2nd respondent, vide proceedings File No CTE-EST2/ SMSL/^20l 2022-ESTABLISHMENT-2CTE-ParI(1)^{dated 01-08-2023 in pursuance of the} G.O.Ms. No. 16, FINANCE^{(HRM.|) DEPARTMENT,dated26-02-2016 and issued} guide lines vide circular Memo No. 308-4/51/A3/HRM-l/2014, dated^{26-02-20'16on} par at par similar situated persons regularized the services^{vide G.O.Ms No 31,} Higher Education (TE) Department dated^{01-05-2023 with consequentialbenefits,}

¶57

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶58

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that^{in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{HighCourt may be pleasedto direct} the respondents to consider the^{representationof the petitioner, dld. 12-05-2023} and to regularize the services of the^{petitioner as MathematicsLecturer in} pursuance of the proposal sent the 3rd respondent to the 2nd respondent^vide Proceedings File No. CTE-EST2iSMSLl2ll^{2022- ESTABLISHMENT-2CTE-} Part(1), dated. 01-08-2023 in^pursuance of the^{G.O.Ms. No. 16, FINANCE (HRM.l)} DEPARTMENT, dated. 26-02-2016 and issued^{guide lines vide circular Memo No.} 308-4/51/ A3/HRM-l/ 2014, dated.26-02-2016^{on par at par similarsituated} persons regularized the services vide G.O.Ms No 31, Higher Education^(TE) Department dated. 01-05-2023 forthwith.

¶59

lA NO: 2 OF 2023

¶60

Petition under Section¹ 51 CPC^praying that^{in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{HighCourt may be pleased to direct} the respondents to continue the^{petitionertill regularizationof the servicesof the} rer rn ursuance of the ro osal sent the 3rd respondent to the 2nd respondent vide^{Proceedings File No. CIE-EST2/SMSL/ 20/}

¶61

2022.ESTABLISHMENT-2CTE-ParI(1),dated.01-08.2023inpursuanceofthe G.o.Ms.No.16,FlNANCE(HRM.l)DEPARTMENT,dated.26-02-2016andissued guidelinesvidecircularMemoNo'308-4/51/A3/HRM-|/20,14,da\ed.26-02-2016 onparatparsimilarsltuatedpersonsregularizedtheservicesvideG.o.MsNo3l. Higher Education^{(1h) Department,dated0l-05-2023forthwith}

¶62

Counsel for the^{Petitioner:SRIPRABHAKARCHIKKUDU} Counsel for the^{Respondents:GP FOR SERVICESI}

¶63

w.P.NO^{: 32580 OF 2023}

¶64

Between:

¶65

S.UmaMaheswari,^{MA (Enolish), D/o Babaiah, Aged about 37 years., Occ'} doniir;il""irrer^{in engtiJfi,Fr',esenttyworkingat-Govt., Polytechnic,Station} GhanPur' ...PETtrtoNER

¶66

AND

¶67

1 . The State of^{Telangana.Repby its Principal Secretaryto,the,Finance} Deoartment, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar^{Secretariat,sallabad' Hyoeraoao'}

¶68

Z. ine State of^{Telangana, Rep by its Principle Secretgry to tne Hrgner} ' iil"'"iT;fi"lnniiiiebrtri,oni oepartnient, Dr. B R Ambedkar Secretariat, Saifabad, HYderabad.

¶69

3 ih; d;mi6iion"r,^{Technical Education Department, State of Telangana'} Nampally, HYderabad

¶70

a fr]" Reolondl Joint^{Director, Departmentof Technicat Education, Government} of Telarigana State,^HYderabad

¶71

s. ihe cor""in.eni^{porvieJnL, nep uy its Principal, Government Polytechnic'} Station GhanPUr,^Jangaon.

¶72

...RESPONDENTS

¶73

Petition under Article^{226 of the constitutionof lndia praying that in the} circumstances^{stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court maybe} pleased to issue a writ^{order or direction, more particularlyonein the nature of writ} ofmandamusdeclaringtheactionofthe2ndrespondentinnon-regularizingthe services of the^{petitioner as EnglishLecturer in pursuance of the proceedings sent} bythe3rdrespondenttothe2ndrespondentvideproceedingsFileNo.CTE-EST2/ SMSL/^{2Ol 2o22-ESTABLISHMENT-2C1E-Part(1) dated. 01/08/2023 in pursuance} of the G.OMs.^{No 16, FINANCE(HRMI) DEPARTMENT'dated 26-02-2016 and} issuedguidetinesVidecircularlvlemoNo.308.A/51/A3iHRlVl-l/2014,dated 26to2tol6onparatparsimilarsituatedpersonsregularizedtheservicesvide G s o rg e( U a ton

¶74

arbitrary, discriminatory, unjust,^{unfarr, unreasonable,whimsical,non-application} of mind, unlawful, unconstitutiona^{I and in violationof Principles of Natural Justice} and in violation of Article 14,16 and^{2'1 of the Constitution of lndia and alsoagainst} the catena of^judgmentsof this^{HonourableCourt and an Apex Court andset-} aside the same and consequently,^{direct the respondentsto regularize the} services of the^{petitioneras English Lecturerin pursuanceof the 3rd respondent} sent proposal to the 2nd respondent,^{vide proceedings File No CTE-EST2/SMSL/} 2Ol 2022-ESf ABLISHMENT-2CTE-ParI(1)^{datedn1-08-2023in pursuanceof the} G.O.Ms. No. 16, FINANCE^(HRM.|) DEPARTMENT,^{dated 26-02-2016 and issued} guide lines vide circular Memo No. 308- A/5'1lA3/HRM-ll2O14, daled 26-02-2016 on^par at^par similar situated^{persons regularizedthe services vide G.O.Ms No 31,} Higher Education (TE) Department dated^{01-05-2023 with consequentialbenefits.}

¶75

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶76

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that^{in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the HighCourt maybe pleased to direct} the respondents to consider the^{representationof the petitioner, dtd. 12-05-2023} and to regularize the services of the^{petitioner as English Lecturer in pursuance of} the proposal sent the 3rd respondent to the^{2nd respondent vide ProceedingsFile} No. CIE-EST2/SMSL/ 2012022-ESr ABLISHMENT-2CTE-Part(1 ),^{dated.01 -08-} 2023 in pursuance of the G.O.Ms. No.^{16, FINANCE(HRM,1)DEPARTMENT,} dated. 26-02-2016 and issued^guide lines vide^{circular Memo No. 308-} Ais1lA3/HRM-,,12014, dated. 26-02-2016 on^par at^par similar^{situatedpersons} regularized the services vide G.O.Ms No 31,^{Higher Education(TE)Department} dated. 01 -05-2023 forthwith.

¶77

lA NO: 2 OF 2023

¶78

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that^{in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^High Court^{may be pleased to direct} the respondents to continue the^petitioner till^{regularization} of^{the servicesof the} petitioner as English Lecturer in pursuance of the proposal sent the 3rd respondent to the 2d respondent vide Proceedings File No. CTE-EST2iSMSL/2OI 2022-ESTABLISHMENT-2CTE-ParI(1) dated. 0l-08-2023 in^pursuance of^the

¶79

G.o.Ms.No.16,FlNANCE(HRM,l)DEPARTMENT,dated.26-02-2016andissued guide lines vide circular^{Memo No. 308-A/51l A3/HRM4/2014,dated. 26-02-2016} onparatparsimilarsituatedpersonsregularizedtheservicesvideG.o.MsNo3l' Higher Education^{(TE) Departmentdated0l-05-2023forthwith'}

¶80

Counsel for the^{Petitioner: SRI PRABHAKARCHIKKUDU} Counsel for the^{Respondents:GPFOR SERVICES-I}

¶81

w.P.NO:32862OF²⁰²³

¶82

Between:

¶83

M Venkanna, M.Sc(Mathematics),^{B.Ed, S/o MYellaiah,..Aqgdabout-38} v"rir, Oc",^{Contraci Lecturer in'Mathematics, Presently Working at Govt.,} Polytechnic, Nizamabad.

¶84

...'ET,T'ONER

¶85

AND

¶86

' The State of^{Telangana,Rep. by its Principal Secretaryto.the,Finance} DeDartment. Dr. B.R.Ambedkar^{SecretariatSaifabad, Hyderabao}

¶87

Z. ihe State oi Telangana'^{Repby its Principal Secretary to the Hlgher} - Ea;";t#arecrrni&t eiuciiiorll, or. B R.Ambedkar secretariat, saifabad, Hyderabad.

¶88

T6e Commissioner,^{Technical Education Department,stateof Telangana,} NampallY, HYderabad.

¶89

- ir," ft"gl"ritloini^{oirector, Departmentof Technical Education. Government} of Telangana^State.

¶90

s. iire oov"einment^{polytechnic, Rep by its principal, GovernmentPolytechnic,} Nizamabad'

¶91

...RESP.NDENT.

¶92

Petition under^{Article226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the} circumstances^{stated in the affidavit filedtherewith,the High Court may be} pleased to issue a writ order^{or direction,moreparticularly one in the nature of writ} ofmandamusdeclaringtheactionofthe2ndrespondentinnon-regularizingthe services of the^{petitioner as Mathematics Lecturer in pursuance of the proceedings} sentbythe3rdrespondenttothe2ndrespondentvideproceedingsFileNo.CTEEST2/SMSL/20t2022-E}TABLISHMENT-2CrE.Patl(1),dated,01lo8l2023in pursuance of the^{G.O.Ms. No.16,FlNANCE(HRM I) DEPARTMENT'dated} 26t02t2}16 and^{issued guide lines vide circular Memo No 308- A/51/A3/HRM-} lt2ol4,dated26to2l2ol6onparatparsimilarsituatedpersonsregularizedthe servicesvideG.O.MsNo.3l,HigherEducation(TE)Department,dated, 1 OS|2O23 as an illeqal,^{arbitrary, discriminatorY,un.iust,unfair, unreasonable,} whimsical, non-application^{of mind,unlav,rful,unconstitutionaland in violation of}

¶93

principles of Natural Justice and in violation of Article 14,'16 and 21 of^the Constitution of lndia^{and also against the catena of judgments of this Honourable} court and an Apex^{Court andset-asrde the same and consequently,directthe} respondents to regularize^{the services of the petitioner as Mathematics Lecturer in} pursuance of the 3rd respondent^{sent proposalto the 2nd respondent,vide} proceed ings File No. CTE-EST2/SM SLl20^{12022-ESTABLI b H M E NT-2CTE-Part(1 )} dated, 0'l/08/2023 in^{pursuanceof the G.O.MsNo '16, FINANCE(HRM I)} DEPARTMENT, dated, 26t02t2o16^{and issued guide lines vide circular MemoNo.} 308 -A/ 51i A3/HRM-1^{t2014,daled, 2610212016on par at par similar situated} persons regularized the services vide^{G.O.Ms No 31, Higher Education(TE)} Department dated 01/05/2023^{with consequential benefits.}

¶94

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶95

Petition under section^{'151CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition,the High court may be pleasedto direct} the respondents to consider^{the representationof the petitioner, dld:1210512023} and to regularize the services^{of the petitioner as MathematicsLecturerin} pursuance of the proposal sent the 3rd^{respondentto the 2nd respondentvide} Proceedings File No. CTE-EST2/^{SMSL/ 20l 2022-ESTABLISHMENT-2CTE-} Part(1), dated, 0'1/08/2023 in^{pursuanceof the G.O Ms. No. 16' FINANCE} (HRM.1) DEPARTMENT, dated, 2610212016^{andissuedguide lines videcircular} Memo No. 308- A/51/A3iHRM-l/2014,^{daled, 261O212016on par at par similar} situated^persons regularized^{the servicesvide G.o.MsNo 31, Higher.Education} (TE) Department dated, 0110512023 forthwith.

¶96

IANO:2OF 2023

¶97

Petition under section 151^{CPC praying thatin the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition,the High court may be pleasedto direct} the respondents to continue^{the petitioner till regularization of, the servicesof the} petitioner as Mathematics Lecturer in^{pursuanceof the proposalsent the3rd} respondent to the 2nd respondent^{vide ProceedingsFile No. CTE-EST2/ SMSL/} 2Ot 2O22-ESI ABLISHMENT-2CTE-ParI(1),^{dated 0'1/08/2023in pursuanceof the} G.O,Ms. No.16, FINANCE^{(HRMI) DEPARTMENT, dated,26102t2O16 and issued}

¶98

guidelinesvidecircularMemoNo'308-A7511A3/HRM-|/2014,dated,2610212016 onparatparsimilarsituatedpersonsregularizedtheServicesvideG.o'MsNo. 31, Higher^{Education(TE) Departmentdated, 0110512023forthwith'}

¶99

Counsel for the^{Petitioner: SRI PRABHAKAR CHIKKUDU} Counsel for^{the Respondents:GP FORSERVICESI}

¶100

The Court made^{the following:COMMON ORDER}

¶101

THE HON'BLE SRT JUSTICE PULLA KARTHTK WRIT PETITION Nos.32497 325L9 32576 32580 and,32862 of2O23

¶102

COMMON ORDER:

¶103

Since the issue raised in all these writ petitions is one and the same, they are taken up for hearing together and being disposed of by this common order.

¶104

Heard Sri Chikkudu Prabhakar, learned counsel for the petitioners, and the learned Government Pleader for Services_I for the respondents.

¶105

l,earned cotrnsel for the petitioner submits that all the petitioners are Post Graduates in concerned subjects and have participated in an interview conducted by the Expert Committee of the respondent and thereafter they were appointed as Junior Lecturer in their respective subjects, on 02.og.2011, 05. 11.201r, 22.O7.2013, 02.og.20Il and O2.O9.2OI1 respectively, against the sanctioned posts, by following Rule of Reservation in the respondent Department and since then the petitioners are discharging their duties till date. Learned counsel has further submitted that the State of

¶106

PI(, J WP 32497 2023 & batch

¶107

¶108

Telangana has taken up a policy for regularization of services of the contract employees urde G.O.Ms.No.16, Finance (HRM) Department, dated 26.02.2016, duly amending Telangana Public Employment (Regularization of Appointments to Public Services and Rationalization of Staff Pattern and Puy Structure), Act, 1994 and issued guidelines for regularization of contract employees. Learned counsel has further submitted that the petitioners have fulfilled all the conditions and guidelines enumerated in G.O.Ms.No.16, dated 26.02.2016 and therefore entitled for regularization. It is further submitted that based on the oral representations of the petitioners, the third respondent has also recommended the case of the petitioners to the second respondent by way of sending proposal for regularization of services of 15 left over contract lecturers working in Government Polytechnic Colleges and the sarne are pending consideration before the second respondent. Therefore, the learned counsel prayed this Court to direct the second respondent to pass appropriate orders on the recommendation made by respondent No.3.

¶109

I
1
I

¶110

PI(, J WP 32497 2023 & barch

¶111

The learned Government Pleader for Services-l has submitted that necessar5r orders will be passed by respondent No.2, pursuant to the recommendations made by respondent No.3, in accordance with law.

¶112

In view of the submissions made by the respective counsel and without going into the merits of the case, these Writ Petitions are disposed of directing respondent No.2 to pass appropriate orders, pursuant to the proposal sent by respondent No.3 uide letter dated OLOB.2023, in accordance with law, within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs-

¶113

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand

¶114

closed.

¶115

//TRUE COPY//

¶116

SD/-A.V.S. PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR a/ sEcroN drrrceR

¶117

¶118

The Principal Secretary to the Finance Department, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad, State of Telangana.

¶119

The Principal Secretary to the Higher Education^(Technical Education),Department, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad, State of Telangana.

¶120

The Commissioner, Technical Education Department, State of Telangana, Nampally, Hyderabad.

¶121

The Regional Joint Director, Department of Technical Education, Government 5. The Principal, Government Polytechnic for Women, Govt- Polytechnic Maheshwaram, Ranga Reddy District

¶122

¶123

The Principal,^{Government Model ResidentialPolytechnic(GMRP)'ltlg9qt. .} " neiiie.iidl Fbr,t"cr,ni"iCrr,1ne; -t Uanrg-rru, Badradri Koihegudem District

¶124

7 id P;r;iprt,^{dovernm'ent Polytechnic,Government Polytechnic'}

¶125

KotheguddmDistrict,^{BadradriKothegudem'I s}

¶126

Td ili;;'pr[^{ooreinmeniFotgecninic' Government Polytechnic' Station}

¶127

Ghanpur, Jangaon.

¶128

s ihJ fiiiii,ri,-Gouernment^{Polytechnic,Government Polytechnic'} Nizamabad.

¶129

rO Cine CC to SRI^{PRABHAKAR CHIKKUDU,Advocate tqPUCl} --

¶130

i r . i*o cc, to Gp FOR srnvtces-t,^{High court for the state of Telangana, at} Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶131

12.Two CD CoPies

PSK. BS.r-rJ}-

I \

t I

HIGH COURT

DATED:21 11212023

COMMON ORDER

WP.Nos.32497, 32519, 32576, 32580 AND 32862 of 2023

¶139

1 HE SIA 14:
o
q
J
{ 3 o5JAN zo24 zot?
* i.
Dt5o41tlH

¶140

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITIONS WITHOUT COSTS.

¶141

5<br>a\x

G. Srinu v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G. Srinu v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A. Madhavi Latha Vs The State of Telangana

J. Sangameshwar Vs The State of Telangana

Smt.R.Vandana Vs The State of Telangana

Golla. Kiran Kumar Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

P.Karuna Sri Vs The State of Telangana

Mallepalli.Madhavi Latha Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others