The High Court of Telangana dismissed the writ petition as infructuous at the hearing stage, based on the submission that the subject matter has become infructuous.
None; writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3304 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO:16917 0F 2018
Between:
U.s.N.Murthii, S/o. suranna- ag^ed abour 5g years, District Rurar water suppry and Sanitalion Engineer (FAC Superintendiig En(Tineerl [aisiion ahiqiiratna lntragrid, ZP Compound, Adilabad, Adilabad SistriEt.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction by declaring the action of the respondents in not considering and promoting the petitioner as superintending Engineer on the ground of pendency of disciplinary inquiry, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of constitution of lndia and consequenfly direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion as Superintending Engineer, without reference to disciplinary enguiry vide charge Memo bearing G.O.Rt.No.53, PR & RD (Vig.l) Dept., dt. 2B-1-2O15 and as per G.O.Ms.No.257, General Administration (Ser.c) Dept. dt. 10-6-1999 and promote him as such, with all consequential benefits.
IA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under section151 cPc prayingthat in the circumstanoesstated in the affidavitfiled in support of the petition, the High court may be pleersed to direct the respondents toconsiderthe case of the petitioner for promotion as superintendingEngineer, without reference to disciplinary enquiries vide charge MemobearingG.o.Rt.No.53,PRandRD(Vig.l)Dept.dt.28-1-2015andasper G.O.Ms.No.257,General Administration (Ser.C)Dept.dt. 10-6-1999andpromote him as such,forthwith, pending final disposalof the mainW 'P'
Counsel for thePetitioner:SRI A.ADINARAYANA FOR SRI S'GOPI\LRAO counsel for theRespondentNos.l & 2: GP FoR MCPL ADMN & URBANDEV counsel for theRespondentNo.3:Gp FORpANCHAyATRAJ & RUTRAL DEV
The Court madethe following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICENAMAVARAPU RAJESTIWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.16917 OF 2018
ORDER:
Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri A. Adi Narayana, representing Sri S.Gopal Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, informed this Court thatthe subject matter of the writ petitionhas become infructuous.
dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall
stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- K.AMMAJI ASSISTANTAEGISTRAR {2p
SECTION OFFICER
To
HIGH COURT
DATED:0810812023
,;1AT€ q A
r9
(
trl
5rr lur li
$s
oo
I
.!
#:f!::t/
ORDER
WP.No.16917 of2018
DTSMISSING THEWRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUSWITHOUT COSTS.
qt:1 +n)5
U.s.N.Murthii, S/o. suranna
The State of Telangana
Namavarapu Rajeswara Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
