Md.Khuddus, v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
[33041
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO:'15766 OF 2018
Between:
Md.Khuddus, S/o.Mustafa, Aged about 38 years, working as Town Planning SupeMsor , Grater Warangal Municipal Corporation, Warangal, Warangal District.
.....PET!TIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petitibn Under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, direction, or Order, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not promoting the petitioner to the post of Town Planning officer from the post of Town Planning Supervisor without reference to charge memo vide G.O.Rt.No.443 MA and UD (VlG. ll) Department dated 06-1 1-2015 is highly illegal and unjustified with a direction to the respondents to promote the petitioner to the post of Town Planning officer from the post of Town Planning Supervisor without reference to charge memo vide G.O.Rt.No.443 MA and UD (VlG. ll) Department dated 06-1 1-2O15.
!.A.NO:1 OF 2018
Petition Unde .:iection 151 CPC praying that in the c rc:umr;tances stated in the affidavit filed rr support of the petition, the High Court nlay be pleased to direct the responder ts; to consider the case of the petitioner iol prtmotion to the post of Town Planni tg officer from the post of Town Pl;tnning Siup{)rvisor without reference to charge 'n')mo vide G.O.Rt No.443 MA anc UD (VtG. l) Department dated 06-1 1-2O15.
Counsel for the Peti ioner : Sri.A.Adi Narayana, Adv for Sri,il./.S.Sai Kumar Counsel for the Res rondents : GP For Mcpl Admn anrl Urbe n De.,r The Court made the tollowing Order :-
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICEN
RAO
ON NO.ls 766 0F 2018
ORDER
Today wh'en the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.A. Adi Narayana, representing Sri M.V.S. Sai Kumar, Iearned counsel for the petitioner, informed this court that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall
stand closed.
SD/. N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/I G3 SECTIdN OFFICER
To
SA cJ Y?-
I \
HIGH COUR I
DATED:0810112023
ORDER
WP.No.1576 i of 2018
. -tj. sTelg
/ )
'z
:
Ct
.b
!$ stP tul
'),)
I
DFS
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS INFRUCI I.]IOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
({A G.X X*
Md.Khuddus
State of Telangana
NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court