The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the levy of a power bill as infructuous because the cause no longer survived for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3300 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 15618 OF 2013
Between:
BINJU SARIA ISPAT (P) LTD., C-1, Government lndustrial Area,Chendulal Baradi, Hyderabad, Rep., by its Director Sumeet Kedia
...PETITIONER
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution oflndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiledtherewith, theHigh Court may be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ direction or order declaringthe actionof the respondentsin raising HT. R & C SupplementaryBill for the monthof November 2012on wrong method of consumption and not consideringthe representation for revisionof the bill as wholly arbitrary, illegal,withoutjurisdictionand void.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 201 3(WPMP . NO: 18915OF 2013)
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, theHighCourt may be pleased to direct the respondents not to insistfor paymentof the demandof Rs.76,27'733l- raised in the HT.R&C Supplementary Bill for themonth of November2012.
l.A. NO: 1 0F 2016 !4UMP.ILO: 2437 oF 20161
Between:
...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS
AND
BINJU SARIA ISPAT (P) LTD., C-1, Government lndustrial Area, Chendulal Baradi, Hyderabad, Rep., by its Director Sumeet Kedia
..RESPONDENT/PETITIONER
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim dated:04-06-2013 in Wp.M.p.No.1Bg15 of 2013 in W.P No.15618 of 2013.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.P.CHANDRAMOULI
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI R.VINOD REDDY, SC FOR TSTRANSCO
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO.15618 OF 2013
ORDER:
Learned counsel forpetitioner brings to thenotice ofthis Court that cause in the writpetition does not survive for adjudication any more.
Petition, shall stand closed.
SD/. P. CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANT RqGFTRAR //TRUE COPY// l/ SECTIo( opsceR
To,
BSR
GJ
HIGH COURT
DATED:2711212023
STAT€
( 69
q
o
2 2 lrN ?$2t
olu
oEsPAl
ORDER
WP.No.15618 ot 2013
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
AS INFRUCTUOUS,
WITHOUT COSTS
-qt/
I
\-)'
BINJU SARIA ISPAT (P) LTD.
The Central Power Distribution Company Ltd., of Andhra Pradesh
The Superintending Engineer, (Operation Circle), APCPDCL, Mahaboob Nagar
The Senior Accounts Officer, (Operation Circle) APCPDCL, Mahaboob Nagar
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
