High Court at Hyderabad dismissed a writ petition filed in 2013 concerning the withdrawal of a land allotment for non-prosecution, noting the petitioner's lack of interest and inordinate delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3300 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
wRtT PET|T|ON NO.17 0F 2013
Between:
M/s. Herbopharm Laboratories, A-1-3-B-1'1 , Chandralok Complex, S.D.Road, Secunderabad, Represented by its Partner Sri Nishit Kadakia.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution oflndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHigh Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, moreparticularly onein the nature of writ of Mandamus declaringthe actionof the respondentsin withdrawing the allotment of Plot No. 36 an extent of1000 Sq. Meters in Teck Park, IDA Nacharam, Hyderabad in favor of thepetitioner which was offeredlo it as a consideration to accept the unilateral and illegalcancellationof allotment of Plot No. 4'l and as a measure of resolving such disputeamicably and in insisting to pay Rs.8,000/-per Sq. meter for the saidPlot No. 36 as againstthe original rate of Rs.2,5001 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, againstthe principles of Natural Justice and to consequently direct therespondents to allot plot No. 36 in the said Tech Park, IDA Nacharam, Hyderabad tothe petitioner @Rs.2,500/- per Sq meter and to execute a suitablymodifiedcomprehensivesale agreement incorporating these changes.
l.A-llo- 1QE20'[3(WPMP. No: 17 oF 2o1sl
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an interim order directing the respondents not to allot or convey Plot No. 36, Tech Park, IDA Nacharam, Hyderabad to any 3rd parties during the pendency of this writ petition.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2q10fl4tPMP. NO: 17168 OF 2016)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order directing that no construction can take place in Plot No. 36 in Teck Park, IDA Nacharam, Hyderabad during the pendency of the present writ petition.
l.A. NO: 2OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 17169 OF 2016)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order restraining the Respondents from allotting Plot No. 36 in Teck Park, IDA Nacharam, Hyderabad admeasuring 1000 sq. mts. in favour of any third party during the pendency of the present writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CH. PUSHYAM KIRAN (NOT PRESENT)
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI L. PRABHAKAR REDDY, S.C. FOR TSIIC
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTI CE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO.I7 oF 20r3
ORDER:
A perusol of the proceeding sheet shows lhot leorned counsel for lhe petitioner sought severol odjournmenls to proceed with the motter. When the motfer wos listed on 08.12.2023, there wos no representotion on beholf of the petitioner ond therefore, it wos directed lo be lisled under the coplion 'for dismissol'. Though ihe motter wos listed under the coption for dismissol, leorned counsel for the pelitioner sought time on 11.12.2023 ond 18.12.2023
As o sequel, miscelloneous petitions pending, if ony, sholl stond
closed ASSISTANTsD/-v.HARl GrsPRASAD R "/
,TRUE COPY//
\
SECTION OFFICER
To,
\
t\4P GJ ;"
HIGH COURT
DATED:2611212023
\TE STAr G' o
01 tEB 2[24
,,,
ORDER
WP.No.17 o12013
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION WIHTOUT COSTS
M/s. Herbopharm Laboratories
A.P, Industrial lnfrastructure Corporation Ltd.
Nagesh Bheemapa
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
