In a writ petition challenging non-conduct of elections and failure to start crushing operations at a cooperative sugar factory in Telangana/Andhra Pradesh, the court held that the cause of action did not survive due to efflux of time and dismissed the matter.
None granted; Writ Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t
I
[3303 ]
IN THE HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAYOF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICEJ SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 12268 OF2013
Between:
K.Sai Reddy, S/o.Lakshmaiah,Aged52 years,Rl/o Jalalpur, Nizamabad District
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ofthe constitution of lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filedtherewith, the High Courtmay be pleased to issue writ direction or order, moreparticularlyone in the natureof writ of Mandamus declaring theactionof Respondentsin not conductingthe election to the third Respondent sugarFactory as is mandatory under Sebtion31 (2) (b) of A.P.Co-Operative SocietiesAct, 1964, as illegal' violative of Articles 14,'19 and 41 of the constitution of lndia and consequentlydirect the respondents to conduct the elections to the Managingcommitteeof RespondentNo.3 society and take steps including allotting fundsfor full fledged functioningof the 3rd respondent.
i
l.A. NO: I OF 2013(WPMP. NO: 15166 OF 2013)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to start crushing cane in this season rn 3'd respondent factory.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI SUNDARESHAN, rep. SRI K.S.MURTHY
Counsel for the Respondents No.1, 2 & 4: GP FOR COOPERATION
-- Counsel for the Respondents No.3 :
The Court made the following: ORDER
,t
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE TI. SR.EENTVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 12268 of 2O13
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Sundareshan, learned counsel representing Sri K.S.Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive by virtue of efflux of time.
dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand
closed.
SD/- G. SIREESHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// (aD SECTION OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:0611112023
ORDER
WP.No.12268 of 2013
$E STAT
(
oo-) 2 0 iili 2ijr3
at
*
1.)ESi)./rT ,d1,"
DISMISS!NG THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
.r?k6 G fr,
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives the efflux of time.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
K Sai Reddy
Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Industries and Commerce Department
Commissioner of Sugar and Cane Commissioner, Andhra Pradesh
Nizamabad Cooperative Sugar Factory Ltd
District Collector
Justice J Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
