A.Srihari, v. B.Anjaneyulu
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt case, the High Court observed that the main writ petition was dismissed as infructuous, causing the contempt application to have no substantive cause.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed and pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1224OF 2019
Contempt Case under Sections 10 lo 12 of Conternpt of Courts Act1 971to punrsh the Respondent herein for willfully, deliberately and intentionally violating and flouting the Orders dated 16.8.2019 in l.A No.1/2019in WP No.16733of 2019.
Between:
A.Srrharr, S/o. A.Narsirnhulu, Aged about 50years, Occ-Employee - HMT, R/o H No.7-1 -307/14l16, Subhash Nagar, Sanathnagar, Hyderabad,Telangana.
...PETITIONER
AND
B. AnJaneyulu, S/o not known to the Petitioner, Agedmajor, Occ: Asst. Registralt Electi-on Officer, HMT Employees Cooperative HouseBuilding Society Ltd., HMT Township. Medchal Malka;giri District.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Asharr
- respondent
Anjaneyulu
Coram
J Sreenivas Rao
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/1224/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court