Disposed

M/s.Premgopal and Co., Chartered Accountants, v. Sri C.Parthasarathi, Ias.

Telangana HC3 Nov 2023CC/1956/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a contempt case filed for non-implementation of a High Court order in W.P No.9448 of 2017, the Court observed that the respondents had implemented the order and there was no dispute. Consequently, no further adjudication was deemed necessary. The Contempt Case was closed, and pending miscellaneous petitions were also closed.

What did the court decide?

Contempt Case No.1956 of 2017 is closed; pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, are closed.

M/s.Premgopal and Co., Chartered Accountants, Vs Sri… — Contempt of Court | Telangana HC (2023)

: i j I

[³³⁰³ ]

; II I

j i I :

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶6

FRIDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW THREE

¶7

PRESENT

¶8

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS^RAO

¶9

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1956 OF 2017

¶10

Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of^{Contemptof Courts Act to} punish the respondents herein for the intentional, wilful and deliberate violation^of the order of the High Court dated 27.03.2017^{passed in WP No.944B of 2017.} Between:

¶11

M/s.Premgopal & Co., Chartered Accountants,, Flat^{No.202, 2nd Floor,} Raghavar-tria Towers, Chirag Ali Lane, Abids Hyderabad^{- 500 001, Rep.byitg} partner Sri P.Premgopal Krishna, Sio.P.Venkateswara Rao, Aged ab_out 56 years, Occ Chartered Accountant, F/o.330/2 RT, PS Nagar, Vijayanagar Colony, Hyderabad - 500 057.

¶12

...PETITIONER

¶13

AND

¶14

Sri C.Parthasarathi, lAS.,, Principal Secretary to Governihent,^{Agricultureand} Agricultural Marketing Cooperative Department,^Telangana State,^Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶15

Sri B.Rajasekhar, lAS,, Principal Secretary to Government,^{Agriculturaland} Cooperative Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh,^4th Block,^Ground Floor, Room No.'101 , A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.

¶16

Sri B.Veerabrahmaiah lAS, Commissioner for Co-operation^{and Registrarof} Co-operative Societies, Government of Telangana, Gruhakalpa,^Opp.Gandhi Bhavan, Nampally, Hyderabad.

¶17

Sri J.Murali lAS, Special Commissioner for Co-operations,^{Registrarof Co-} operative Societies, Govemment of Andhra Pradesh, Skylab^{Towers, D.No.2-} 16-83, 11th Lane, Syamala Nagar, Guntur District^- 522206.

¶18

Sri N.Muralidhar,, Managing Director, Telangana State Co-operative^Bank Limited, Troop Bazar, Abids, Hyderabad.

¶19

Smt.Mahalakshmi,, Managing director, AP State Co-operative^{Bank Limited,} NTR Sahakara Bhavan, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

...RESPONDENTS

! t

/ a.L NO: 1 OF 2017(APPL. NO: 878 OF 20171

¶24

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased to direct the Respondents to implement the Orders dated 27 .03.2017,^passed in WP No.944B of 2017 on the file of this Hon'ble Court, pending disposal of the above Contempt Case.

¶25

Counsel for the Petitioner

¶26

: SRl. N. GANGADHAR,

¶27

Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.^'l & 3

¶28

: ASSISTANT GP for CO-OOPERATION (Telangana State)

¶29

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 & 4

¶30

: ASSISTANT GP for CO-OOPERATION (A.P. State)

¶31

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 5 & 6

¶32

: SRI ROHITH

¶33

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶34

¶35

i I i l l i I

¶36

I{ON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO

¶37

Contetnpt Case No.1956 of 2OL7

¶38

ORDER:

¶39

This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act for non-implementation of the order granted by this Court in W.P.No.9448 of 2017, dated 27.O3.20t7.

¶40

Heard Sri N.Gangadhar, learned coundel appearing for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Co-operation (Telangana State) appearing for respondent Nos. 1 and 3, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Co-operation(A.P. State) appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 4 and Sri Rohith, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.5 and 6.

¶41

During the course of hearing, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.S'and 6 submits that the respondents implemented the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.9448 of 2017, dated27.O3.2Ol7 and the^{same is} not disputed by the learned counsel for the^petitioner.

II I i I

-.<br>

In view of the above submission, no further

¶46

adjudication is required.

¶47

Accordingly, Contempt Case is closed.

¶48

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand

¶49

closed.

¶50

¶51

SD/. K.SHYLESHI DEPUTY REGISTRAR F'.*4'.,.

¶52

//TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER

¶53

To,

¶54

Two CCs to Assistant G.P for Co-operation^(Telangana State),^{High Courtfor} the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.^(OUT) 2. Two CCs to Assistant G.P for Co-operation^(A.P.State), High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.^(OUT)

¶55

One CC to SRl. N. GANGADHAR, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to SRI ROHITH, Advocate [OPUC]

¶56

Two CD Copies DL

; i I II I

i I

. : ,lI I i I II J i ,i l

HIGH COURT

JSR,J

DATED:03/11/2023

ORDER

CC.No.'1956 ol 2017

STATA
q
o
et ? $t 2t8 e.L
+.
* Dss.'ri(

¶68

: I t! t+I I i ,!I .:Ii

¶69

CLOSING THE C.C.

¶70

Otft)"'

¶71

:
i
tI
i
I

M/s.Premgopal and Co., Chartered Accountants, v. Sri C.Parthasarathi, Ias.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Premgopal and Co., Chartered Accountants, v. Sri C.Parthasarathi, Ias.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. Chandraiah, Vs Mr. Rajatha Kumar, I.A.S.

Bachu Laxman Vs Sri Sri C.v.Anand I.P.S.

P.Venugopal Goud and 2 Others Vs The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise and 3 Others

Gmr Infrastructure Limited Vs Sri. ChalasaniVenkateswara Rao

A.Srihari, Vs B.Anjaneyulu

R.Rajaiah Vs C. Ambaiah