Writ Appeal No. 87 of 2023 was withdrawn by the appellant. The High Court granted leave for withdrawal and dismissed the appeal consequential to the same.
Leave to withdraw the Writ Appeal granted; the Writ Appeal dismissed on withdrawal; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3311 I
I I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N. TUKARAMJI
WRIT APPEAL NO: 87 OF 2023
Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the Order dated 1410912022 passed in W. P. No. 2652 of 2021 on the file of the High Court.
Between:
CMA K. Raghavender Reddy, S/o Late. K. lvlalla Reddy, Aged about 58 years, Occ. Business (Membership No. 30434), Rlo 8-2-277151203, Apurupa Apartments, Road No.2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 5000034.
...AppELLANr
AND
...REspoNDENrs
lA NO: 2 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order of the Learned Single Judge made in W.P. No. 2652 ot 2021, daled 14/0912022, pending disposal of the above Writ Appeal,
Counsel forthe Appellant: SRI S. R. K. VELICHETY
Counsel for Respondent No. 't: SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR
Dy. SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 to 6: SRI R. V. NAGABHUSAN
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE E ON'I}LE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BIITIYA]V
AND
Tl IE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKhRAM,II
Writ Appeal No.87 of 2O23
JUDGMENT: ry" t tt e tTor'bte ttLe Cttief Justrl:e Utal BLuson)
Heard Mr.S.R.K.Velchety, learned counr)eI for the appellant; Mr.G.Praveen Kumar, learned Deputl, Solicitor General of India representing respondent Nc.1; and Mr.R.V.Naga )husan, learned counsel for rt:spor: <L:nt Nos.2 to 6.
)
/
dismissed on withdrawal.
Miscellaneous applicationspending,ifany, shall
stand closed. However,there shall be no orderas to costs.
I
\
Sd/- M. MANJOLA DEPUTYREGISy'RAR //TRuE coPY// sEcloN t/r,"r*
To 1 one ccto sri s R,K veugl:t{}::?Bt""rtot|3f;l"',o, o"n",rr(.PUC) 2. one CC toSri Gadi PraveenI 3. 5;; ;E i;5il R-nNasabhusan' Advocate(oPUC) 4. Two CDCoPies
M BC _l
IJ
HIGH COURT HCJ & NTR,J
DATEID: 1010212A23
..'4 :-::-:::=. -
l.'
\ <br>ri
1E t:t ijt
-t
-.
ORDER
I\l,A.lrlo.87 ot 2023
DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN,
VV,T"THOUT COSTS
-
o
a-)
CMA K. Raghavender Reddy
The Secretary, MCA - A WING
The Secretary Cum Returning Officer, The Institute of Cost Accountants of India
Director (Discipline), The Institute of Cost Accountants of India
Dr. Murthy
The President, The Institute of Cost Accountants of India
Ujjal Bhuyan
N. Tukaramji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
