The single judge dismissed an appeal by United India Insurance against a compensation award for a motor accident where the vehicle was overloaded. The court found no reason to interfere with the Tribunal's decision.
Appeal dismissed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3230 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
IUONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF IVARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 2406 OF 2009
Appeal filed under Section Appeal filed under Section 173 of t/otor Vehicles Act against the Order and decree in IVI.V O.P No.523 of 2006, Dated 1402-2008 on the file of the Court of the Charrman Motor Accident Claims Tribunalcum-ll Additional District Judge, Warangal.
Between:
...APPELLANTS/R-2 & 3
AND
...RESPONDENT/CLAIMANT
RESPONDENTS/R.1
Counsel for the Appellants : SRI A.MALATHI
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI A.RAGHU RAMA AURAVA
Counsel for-the Respondent No.2: SRI BANKATLAL MANDHANI
The Court made the following: ORDER
tIOI{,] ILE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEJ.-I\N1.I
M.A.C.M.A.No. 2406 of 2OO9
J UDGMENT
'h s is an ,\ppeal filed by the Irsur:rrr,rrr Ciompar-r1. aggricvcrilrv tl :' Au,arddaled14 .O2.2008in O. P. t'lo. ,23 of 2O06 on theiLle cth.c Motor AccidentsClaims Tri:r.naL-clLrn II AclclitionzrLDtsl icL.Judge at Warangal.
-l- rc respondent Insurance Cornpan, filt:d the counter-afiid.lrrr Ileadingthat thelrare not aware of '.lLecriminal case ancltl)c i1(;ric ent wasnot reported to themby the instred in collusionrr.ith h :claimant u,itl-r a view tocause lo ss Lo thc
2
lr-rsurance Company. Itissubmittcdthat theanroullt ol compcnsalion claimed is excessivc.
e-
\'lt s 'lrt' llrst qr-oLrrrrl u ith rt-g:rrrl rc l crnit I tcgrrt i', r'r1 )\ rl,'l'ribrrLrul rrrrrl tlrrs Court cloc's not IrL:l li r.rlt rrrth llrt' sairl rr,li-rj. l'hcn ccrninq t() thc isslle th:lt th,) .,ehicler,,as ovcr-lorrrl.'r l. :lrr Trilrrtn:rl lLclrl tlr:rl tllc InsLlrance C'onr: rnv did not clroost' Lo:rrrrlt tr':rr11, r-clrttllirl tviclr:rrcc to dis;tu1e tlr : vcrsiorr olthc clzrinrurl li,.,a,'o1'P.\V I iurcl l,lxs.Al to A5 to shl,' tl at tlr('rc is contrilr rt()rv r'r 'giigenc(' or.r tll(' p:rrt ol'the ov'nt'r cl -he vc'hii:le Tht' rt sp,,:rcle: oLrghl I r lr:rvr: rrdduccd c\rid-rncc :-r Lt :;till, tl-rc Trilrunrrl irrr,l rr lrl thal Llrt' Instrrar-rce Company ('i]-r J):rv iur(l rccovcr- l-r-onr tl' '()r</sup> ner- ol ihc' vchiclc
ti. . n tlrat vicrv ol tllc matter, thrs Co-t.t fLnds no rc:ison to inrc| rrlL- ,r,ith thc A$,arrl ol'the Tribulal arcl tht, Appcal is li.rblc tc br d srnissed.
9
' h: Appczrl is irccordingly, dismissecl. I o orcler as to
C0Sl S
10 I ending misc:ellanr:ous petitions, if :tn1 , ;hall st:rnd
c lo secl
St)/.T.JAYASREE ASSISTAI{T REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// i:;EC TION.6FFICER To, '1 The chilrr "ran N4otor Accident craims Tribunar-oum_I r,,:lditronar Drstrict Judqe /V; ranqal. 2 One CC rc S,tf c. RAGHU RAjVA AURAVA Advoc ate lo: t.,c] 3 one cc to Srit 3ANKATLAL.[/ANDHANI'no,io."#'idb,r,,t 1 9n"cc to SRI A IVALATHt ao"o.riu'lOpLiLlveue tv 5 Two CD C or_.s BSK
t\L
HIGH COURT
DATED:13 0312023
ORDER
MACMA.l{o.2406 of 2009
.a-of rer ):
(- "',\i
(
-* li
^t
$- ,:; rr
i,/
\ -r/
t'.'
.,.
,_a;:- i -
DISMISSIN 3 THE APPEAL WITHOUT C !)STS
Oeirgo6'1
[3230 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
IUONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF IVARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 2406 OF 2009
Between:
...APPELLANTS/R-2 & 3
AND
...RESPONDENT/CLAIMANT
.RESPONDENTS/R-I
Appeal filed under Section Appeal filed underSection1 73 of Motor Vehicles Act against the Order and decreein M.V.O.P No.523of 2006, Dated 14- O2-2OO8 on the file of the Court of theChairmanMotor Accident Claims Tribunal- cum-ll Additional District Judge, Warangal.
ORDER : This Appeal coming on for hearingand upon perusingthe grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the LowerCourtand the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of SdM/s.Malathi,Advocate for the Appellant and Sri A.Raghu Rama Aurava, Advocatefor the Respondent No.1 and sri Sri Bankatlal Mandhani, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. r
r
(
tl
I li
This Court dotr Ord',r rnd Decree as follows
St,-T.JAYASREE ASS I;'TANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY// SiECTIONTOFFICER
HIGH COURT
DATED:131032023
DECREE
-=::-\ -
or 's,.{r'<br>,1, '-'<br>.$t I
I
r$
I
\ ;')i
1..
/
...!- ,'',t,q'
. t, .: -'.i'
<br>
MACMA.No.2406of 2009
DISMISSINGTHE APPEAL WITHOUT C( 'STS
0 &9.'"V
o'
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal was correct in awarding compensation despite the driver being overloaded the vehicle.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD.
GADALA SAMAKKA
SYED RAHEEM
LALITHA KANNEGANTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
