Dismissed

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., v. Shake Naga Malleswari and 6 Others

Telangana HC10 Mar 2023MACMA/4250/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of an Motor Accident Claim Miscellaneous Appeal (MACMA) by relying on a Lok Adalat award where the appellant insurance company withdrew the appeal, resulting in the confirmation of the lower court's decree.

What did the court decide?

The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, confirming the Judgment and Decree of the Lower Court. Unpaid amount with interest to be paid within one month.

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Vs Shake… — Execution and Attachment | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

HIGHCOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶2

FRTDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF MAI(CH T^IO T}IOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SMTTUSTICE LALTTHA KANNEGANTT

¶5

MOTORACCID ENTCTVI L MISCELLAIYEOUS APPEAL NO: 11250 OF 2012

¶6

Appeal filed under section r73 of M.v. Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 29-08-2012, made in MVop. No. 620 oi zoro on rhe file of the Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum II Additional District Judge (FTC), Khammam.

¶7

Between:

¶8

The Oriental Irsurance Company Ltd.,, Rep.by its Br.Manager, tabbipel tr{G Road, Vijayawada.

¶9

...APPELLANT/(ESPONDENT NO.2

¶10

AND

¶11

Shake Mgjr,Malleswari,_W-/o.lte.lamulu, 2Z yrs, cx:c: Agriculture, Coolic, presently R/o.Arukuru Village, Madhira Mandal, Kharrina District.

¶12

2 Shake Mounika, D/o.[ate.Ramulu, aged 9 yrs, occ : Student, Minor, Rep.by their mother Resp.No. 1.

¶13

3 Shake Narendra, D/o.[-ate.Ramulu, aged 7 yrs, occ : Studeng Minor, Rep.by their mother Resp.No.L.

¶14

Shake Venkateswarlu, S/o.Veraiah, aged 57 yrs, occ : Coolie, presently R/ o.Arukuru Vitlage, Madhira Mandal,^-Khamma District.

¶15

5 Qh_ake Bhudemma, W/o.Venkateswarlu, aged 52 yrs, occ : Coolie, presently R/o.Arukuru Village, Madhira Mandal, K[arnma District.

¶16

, ...... RespondenVpetitioners

¶17

R.Koteswara Rao, S/o.Narayana, age Major, occ : owner of Bus No.Ap_Z)X 5]57, Rio. H.No.12-7Q Saibaba Ternple stieet tvladhira Town, Kammam District.

¶18

The AISRTC, Rep.by its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad.

¶19

... RESPONDENTSAESITONDENTS

¶20

I.A. NO:2 OF2012(MAC MAMP. NO: 8506 0F 2012)

¶21

Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the execution of decree and judgrnent passed in MVop No. 620 of z0lo,

¶22

1 I

¶23

dated 29.08.2012 on th.: file of the Chairman, Motor Accidenrs Claims Iribunal_ I[ Additional DistricrJ :dge (FTC), Khammam.

¶24

Counsel for the Appell rnt(s): SRI. KOTA SUBBA RA()

¶25

Counsel for the Respor ,lent: SRI. K SARATH

¶26

The Court made the f ol owing: JUDGMENT

¶27

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTTCE LALITIIA KA.DINEGA.TtTI

¶28

M.A.C.M.A.No.4 25,0 of 20 12

¶29

JUDG

¶30

This MACMA is disposed of in terms of the Award passed by

¶31

the tok Adalat No order as to costs

¶32

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall

¶33

stand closed.

¶34

Sd/- MOHD. SA^NAULLAH ANSARI ./

¶35

ASsrsrANrREcr-si"riiii ,/

/.rRUECOry/

To,

SECTIONOFFICER

The Chairma O Motor Accident Claims Tribu nal-cum-II Additional Districr Judge (FTC), Khammam. (with records, if any) 2. One CC bo Sri. Kota Subba Rao Advocate [oPUcl

¶40

One CC to Sri. K Sarath Advocare {OpUC I 4 TwoCDCoPles 5 One spare coPy (Enclosed a copy of Award of Lok Adalat)

CHG

\ =-

HIGH COUR:-

DATED:l0/03/|1023

IUDGMENT

MACMA.No.42 50 of 20t2

¶47

::<br>/'1 :
E, ; i4 r{
/ 3 c^
()
n g, Jiil{ 2Ml
ii-

MACMA IS DISPOSED

OF IN TERMS OF

LOK ADALAT AWARD

*9.
---4 \ f
z:, <br>

¶52

¶53

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE

¶54

(HIGH COINT FOR THE STAIE OF TELANGANA. HYOERABAD)

¶55

[Under^{SeclionI 9 of the tegol Services AUlhoritiesAct. 1987 (CentrolAct)l}

¶56

Date:1 1-O2-2O23

¶57

Present:1 . Hon'ble Smt Justice G. Anupama Chakravarthy

¶58

lcEs
c.)a
t)
l.

¶59

(Judge, HiSh C-ourt aor ttE St te of Yeldrganal Chairman

¶60

. 2..Sri Sodumu Nagesh Reddy, Advocate, Ltember

¶61

Smt D. MadhaYi, Advocate, Member

¶62

litACirAA. No.4250 0f 20 1 2

¶63

(Before the Hon'ble High Court)

¶64

AGAINST

¶65

M.V.T.O.P.No.620 of 2O1O

¶66

(On the file of the Motor Vehicle Accidents Claims Tribunal, Ir Addl District Judge, (F.T.c) Khammam)

¶67

BETWEEN:

¶68

The Oriental lnsurarrce Company Ltd. Rep. by its Br.Manager, Labbipet, MG Road, Vijayawada.

¶69

...Appetlant/Respondent tlo.2

¶70

AND

¶71

Shake Naga lrla[teswari W/o.(ate.Ramulu, 77 Yrs, occ: Agriculture, Cmtie, presentty R/o.Arukuru vittage, Madhira lvlandat,' Khammam District.^'

¶72

2, Shake lvlounika D/o.tate.Ramutu,^{aged 9 Yrs,} Occ: Student, Minor, Rep. by ttrcir mother Resp.No.1 .

¶73

Shake Narendra D/o. Late. Ramutu, aged^{7 Yrs,} Occ: Student, Minor, Rep. by ttrcir mother Resp.No.1 .

¶74

Shake Venkateswartu S/o.Veraiah, aged 57^Yrs, Occ: Coolie, presentty R/o. Arukuru Vittage, l,{adhira Llandat, Khammam District,

¶75

Shake thudemma W/o.Venkateswartu, aged 52^Yrs, Occ: Cootie, presently R/o. Arukuru Village, l'{adhi ra lrlandal, Khalimam District.

¶76

...Respondents / Petitioners

¶77

R.Koteswara Rao S/o.Narayana,^age Major, Occ: owner of 8us No.AP-20-X-5757 , Rlo. H.No. 12-70, Saibaba Temple street, Madhira Town, Khammam District.

¶78

The APSRTC, Rep.by its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad.

¶79

.... Respondents / Responden ts

¶80

-\ .^f"( '''la'o'vr^'

¶81

AWARD

¶82

This is an app^,at fited by the Appettant the Orient,lt lnsu?nce Company. 2. The Learned Counsel for the Appettant/the Oriental. ln;ur;rnce Company represented t rat the lnsurance Company is withdrawing ttre appeal fited by them.

¶83

3' The said re[ esentation is recorded and the appeirr is dismissed as withdrawn, r:nfirming !h" Judgment and Decrec, of the Lower Court/ tnouna betow. The amount if any remarnir g unpaid to the ctaimant(s) :;h; .[ be paid by the Appettants/The Orientat n: urance Company within one m rnth from the date of receipt of the ,rward, atong with interest.

¶84

¶85

The Responder ts/petitioners No.1 to 5 are permitted to withdraw their respective shar.s as per the apportionment and orders shir( be made by the Court/Tribunat )etow.

¶86

This Award sha L t)e subject to verification of cross appeat/,:ro:;s objection, if any, fited t,y h<, Respondent, otherwise the parties are rt [ib(]rty to appty for recat[ of thi: Order/Award.

¶87

Court fee paid c I this appeat shatt be refunded.

¶88

No costs.

¶89

For The Orieotal lnsurance Co. Ltd
tory
Appettant/ Responden No.2
The Orientat lnsura nce Compa ny
Ubo1ott.-
-:t= g --ofi,,.o-u;
CHAl N MEMEEh
TAEMBER
lcEs
(1!.<br>G .{jJ i^<br>g 65L of.
fhe Com mittee)

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., v. Shake Naga Malleswari and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., v. Shake Naga Malleswari and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Thirupathi Vs Icici Lombard General Insurance Company Limited

National Insurance Co. Ltd., Vs Janagam Ashok Rao and Another

Smt. Humeera Fathima Vs Mrs. B.Janardhan Reddy

The New India Assurance Company Vs Masula Sathavva

Munagala Sandhya Rani Vs P.Thirupathaiah

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Nizamabad. Vs Puppala Voddemma, Nizamabad Dist., and 5 Ano.