Dismissed

The United India Insurance Co. Ltd., and Another v. Polala Sunil and 2 Others

Telangana HC13 Mar 2023MACMA/1133/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-paragraph order relates an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award. The allure was dismissed without costs as the issue regarding insurer liability was already settled law in the Honble Apex Court, requiring insurance companies to pay compensation without contesting the O.P. against the RTC. No substantive reasoning was provided

What did the court decide?

The MACMA was dismissed; no order as to costs.

The United India Insurance Co. Ltd., and Another Vs… — Motor Accident Claims | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³²³⁰ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MONDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

¶6

M.A.C.M.A.No.1133 ot 2o11

¶7

Appeal Under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act against the order and decree in O.P.No.904 of 2OO7 dated 27.01 .2O1 1 on the file of the Court of the Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal -cum- V Additional District Judge (ll FTC) at Warangal.

¶8

Between:

¶9

The United lndia lnsurance Co. Ltd., Rep. by its Branch Manager, 2-8-286, 1 st Floor, Mukarampura, Karimnagar

¶10

The United lndia lnsurance Co. Ltd., Rep. by its Divisional Manager, M.G. Road' waranga

¶11

..APPELLANTS/R2 & 3

¶12

AND

¶13

Polala Sunil, Sio Sammi Reddy, aged 30 years, Rl/o Q.No. G-26, APR Colony, Kamalapur, Mangapet lvlandal, Warangal District.

¶14

...RESPONDENT/CLAIMANT

¶15

M. Venkat Reddy, Sio Not known FYo C/o Sai Baba Travels, Sikh Wadi Karimnagar Town

¶16

...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT No.1

¶17

The APSRTC, Rep. by its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT No.4

¶18

Counsel for the Appellants: SMT. A. MALATHI

¶19

Counsel forthe Respondent No.3: SRI KALLAKURI SRINIVASA RAO

¶20

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: NONE APPEARED

¶21

The Court delivered the following:^JUDGMENT

¶22

¶23

HON'BI-E SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA HANNI)CiANTI

¶24

M.A.C.M.A.N o. I13 3 of20ll

¶25

J u-D G_ M I _N_Ti

¶26

ll is is an Appeal filed bv thc lrrsLiranr e oompanv aggrrevcd bv tl e Award clated 27 .OI.2O I 1 rn O p. N.r , rO4 ot 2()O7 on the tilc t f the Molor Accidents Claims Tr lrtn: i curr V Additiona, Dis rict Judgc (ll F-lC) at Warar igai, u he rcirv lhc Tribltnal liekl t re Ir-rsurance Compant, hablc ;rnil <lir-r,r:rcci (itcnr lo pa\ (lomp('nsat or-r of Rs.7l,OOO/ u,ith sintplc rprcrcs, i1 rloi, i)(.r annum frr,rp 11- e date of I'iling the original p(,tirror ill Lltc d:ir<. ol deposit or realit alion.

¶27

L :arned Standing Counsc.l Io iirc Inrillr.ln(:(l

¶28

Compar-,1, subm ts that the Insurance CornPalrr :s rrrlL r i ,.r.c I irs lrrr. as haltiljt_v is,:o 16spns6. It is submittecl thirl rltL.rUttt, .r i,Lr,s $irs hired bv t-lre l?T I and once it is hired, rh(. Il.l.C :rlrn,r s I a bk, ro Da-' the cornpcr se-tion, but hor,vevcr-, the 'r'rrrrrrr rrr rtrcr crr:nrisscrr the O.P. :igulns[ tlre RTC and fixed thc lrabrlirr Iorlr ori rl]r ,rr.r.rr.r as u'cll zrs tltc in iurer.

¶29

TI e issue is no Ionger res irrt(,qr.r , ts i tre I{orr'lrk' Apex Court irL llttar pradesh State Road 'l'ransport Corporation u. )!.ajenderi Deuit Ltacl hr:ld LIt;rr rloLrgl I tr' . L.lt ir.lr rs lrircd rr itlt Lit . RTC, Insuranr.c Cornptiirrr rs rrlrl,. prr tlrL (oDtpr.itsiltl()Il

¶30

rlr . ) )\L 1,...t a ot ((laSc\l jr)

¶31

¶32

¶33

In view of t.hc ratro laid dou,n by the Hon,ble Apex

¶34

Court, the Appeal is dismisscd. No order as to costs.

¶35

5 Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shalt stand

To,

closed.

I Sd/.K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ,* SECTION OFFICER

¶40

1' The chairman, Motor Accident craims Tribunar -cum- v Additionar District Judge (ll FTC) at Warangal. (with records)

¶41

One CC to Smt. A. Matathi, Advocate tOpUCl

¶42

One CC to Sri Kallakuri Srinivasa Rao, Advocate tOpUCl

¶43

Two CD Copies

gbr

&--

HIGH COURI

DATED: 1310312023

JUDGMENT

l.
- .:. ,,:.
,l
rr :it L t?l

¶50

MACMA.No.'133 ot2011

¶51

DISMISSING THE MACMA WITHOUT CI)STS

¶52

/ 1.,'
)
t')

¶53

[³²³⁰ ]

¶54

tN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶55

MONDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶56

PRESENT

¶57

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

¶58

M.A.C.M.A.No.1 133 of 2O11

¶59

Between:

¶60

1 The United lndia lnsurance Co. Ltd., Rep. by its Branch Manager, 2-8-286, ]9t^{Fl9o1,Mukarampura, Karimnagar}

¶61

2 The United lndia lnsurance Co. Ltd., Rep by its Divisional Manager, M.G. Road, Warangal

¶62

AND

¶63

...APPELLANTS/R2 & 3

¶64

Polala Sunil, S/o Sammi Reddy,.aged 30. y_ears, Rl/o e.No. G_26, ApR Colony, Kamalapur, Mangapet Mandal, Wirangal bistrict.

¶65

M. venkat Reddy, s/o Not known Fl/o c/o srr B;;l?:I,r:rTDsENhT/ctAlMANr Karimnagar Town

¶66

...RESpONDENT/RESpONDENT No.1"-'

¶67

The APSRTC, Rep. by its Managing Direcror, Musheerabad-. ii;;;;;

¶68

...RESpONDENT/RESpONDENT No.4

¶69

Appeal Under section 173 of Motor Vehicres Act against the order and decree in o.P.No.904 ot 20or dated 21.01 .201 1 on the fire of the court of the chairman, Motor Accident claims Tribunal -cum- V Additional District Judge (ll FTC) at Warangal.

¶70

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Lower court and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of smt. A. Ivlalathi, Advocate for the Appellants and of Sri K. Srinivasa Rao, Advocate for the Respondent No.3 and for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 not appeared either in persons or by Advocates.

¶71

I I

¶72

This Court doth Ord( r and Decree as follows

¶73

That the IVACN/A ',1c.'1 133 of 201 1 be and here is dismissed and

¶74

That there siall br no order as to costs in this Appeal.

¶75

Sd/.K.AMMAJI ASS S'TANT.REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// (li

¶76

.CiECTiON OFFICER

¶77

To,

¶78

The Ch:rirma ), [/otor Accident Claims Tribunal -+um. ,' A(iditional District Judge (ll FTC ) at Warangal.

¶79

Two CD Copi' rs

gbr n SL --

\ (

HIGH COURT

DATED: 13103t2023

DECREE

MACMA.No.1133 ot 2011

¶86

DISMISSING THE MACMA WITHOUT C0STS

¶87

l* -1a:

The United India Insurance Co. Ltd., and Another v. Polala Sunil and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The United India Insurance Co. Ltd., and Another v. Polala Sunil and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The New India Assurance Company Vs Masula Sathavva

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Vs Shake Naga Malleswari and 6 Others

Munagala Sandhya Rani Vs P.Thirupathaiah

United India Insurance Company Limited Vs a. Laxman Rao

United India Insurance Company Limited, Karimnagar and Other Vs Gadala Sammakka and Another

B. Anjaneyulu, Vs Md. Khaja Moinuddin