Dismissed

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Hyd. v. Bayamolola Sibash, Nizamabad and Ano

Telangana HC21 Jul 2023MACMA/2372/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment records the disposal of an appeal before the Telangana High Court来确定 it was dismissed as withdrawn as per a Lok Adalat award, confirming the lower tribunal's decree and ordering payment of dues.

What did the court decide?

The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. The insurance company was directed to pay the remaining amount within one month along with interest. Court fee was refunded.

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Hyd. Vs Bayamolola Sibash… — Insurance | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

t^3258I

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMBASIVARAO^NAIDU

¶6

M.AC.M.A. NO i 2372 0F 2012

¶7

Appeal filed under Section^{173 of MotorVehicles Act against the order and} decree in O.P.No.353 ot^{20O4 dated31-07-2008on the file of the Court of the} Chairman Motor Accident^{Claims Tribunal-cum- Vll Additional District Judge(FTC)} Nizamabad at Bodhan.

¶8

Between:

¶9

The New lndia Assurance Co. Ltd.,^{Rep. by its Br. Manager, Br. Office, 6-3-8621N8,} ll.Floor, Lalbunglow, Green^{Lands,Ameerpet, Hyderabad.}

¶10

...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT NO.2

¶11

AND

¶12

Bayamolola Sibash, S/o. Ramulu, Hindu,^{Labour Fl/o. Neela (V) of Renjal} Mandal, Dist. Nizamabad.

¶13

...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

¶14

Mrs. G.Shyamala Reddy, Wo. G.Krishna^{Reddy Owner of RTCBus bearing} No. AP-11-V-3505 R/o. H.No. 1l-1-389114,^{Prashanthnagar, Saidabad,} Hvderabad.

¶15

e<f"rlr 1Al< cowr ov/'r"' "'RESP6NDENT/RE'PoNDENT .* ti'1h;i,f

¶16

MACMAMP. NO : 3253 OF²⁰⁰⁹

¶17

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{praying that in the circumstances stated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay} the execution of decree and^{judgment passedin OP.No. 353/2004 dated} 31.07.2008 on the file of^{the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal(Vll} Addl. District Judge^(FTC) Nizamabad^{at Bodhan, pendingthe final disposal of} the main appeal

¶18

Counsel for the Appellant: SRI KOTA^{SUBBA RAO}

¶19

Counsel for the Respondent^{No.1: SRI AZARSRAVAN KUMAR}

¶20

The Court delivered the^{following:JUDGMENT}

¶21

THE HON'ELE SRI .IUS?iCL..; :]AjifEASiVA RAO NAIDU

¶22

l'I.A.C.l,Li. liti.';..:.! lZ OF^2O I 2

¶23

JUDGMENT:

¶24

During [hc pcrr ciclr cy ir! li r1-.r;,.ciil. tilc matter was referrcd to thc i.,ol( i\dalrit.^,,,r',i ,lllr: \ i,:i St ttlCd bt]fOrC

¶25

the Lok Adalat, r,idc Au'arC dn',,r'ct 10 06.20.2:l

¶26

Accordrns.i.y, this fuir(^:\i '.. i:; riisixrscrl ol, in terms

¶27

of the arvard pnssc:d hi Lirir , i,i<^,"i iiii:-,1 .^I'li; c.rrrlcr :rs to COSTS

¶28

Consc<1r;cn ll', l1i|,(^,: iii,r l)a'iilr()ris^il a rl,.',

¶29

appr:arl si'r.iii su,, , ..,,,*'': pending, lll :,'rt:

¶30

SD/-MOHD.SANAULLAH ^_.^ANSARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

)*..SECTION OFFICER

To,

,l . The Chairman, MACT.cum.Vll Additional District Judge (FTC), Nizamabad at Bodhan (with records)

¶35

One CC io Sri^{Kota SubbaRao,Advocate [OPUC]}

¶36

One CC to Sri^{Azar Sravan Kumar, Advocate[OPUC]}

¶37

Two CD^CoPies ASR2iplp

vr--

HIGH GOURT

DATED:21 10712023

JUDGMENT

MACMA.No.2372 of 2012

¶43

l tiE Slh f.i'
(
+
+
1 4 0E[ 20zJ >
A

a
S,cpAT C11

¶44

DISPOSING M.A.C.M.A. IN TERMS OF LOK ADALAT AWARD. WITHOUT COSTS

¶45

6 "{%
w--
fril"

¶46

¶47

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶48

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE

¶49

(HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD)

¶50

[undet^Seclion l9 of lhe r.egor Services Authorities Acr, r 987 (cenkor Acr)t

¶51

Date:10-06-2023

¶52

Present: 1. Hon'ble Justice G. Sri Devi

¶53

Chairman

¶54

(Former luoqe of High Court for the State of Telangana)

¶55

1q,ES C
llJ +
+ Fot

¶56

2.Sri P.lndra Prakash, Advocate, Member

¶57

3.5mt. Nanditha Guha, Advocate, Member

¶58

lrlAClvlA.No. 2372 of 2012

¶59

(Before the Hon'ble l{igh Court)

¶60

AGAINST

¶61

O.P.No. 353 of 2OO4

¶62

( On the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunat

¶63

(Vll Addl. Dist. Judge (FTC) Nizamabad at Bodhan )

¶64

BETWEEN:

¶65

The New lndia fusurance Co. Ltd., Rep. by its Br.Manager, Br.Office, 6-3-8621 Al B, ll Ftoor, Latbungtow, Green Lands, Ameerpet, Hyderabad.

¶66

And

¶67

...AppetLant/Respondent No.2

¶68

Bayamolola Subash, S/o. Ramu(u, Hindu Aged about 25 yrs, occ: Labour, R/o. Neeta (V) of Renjat Mandat, Dist. Nizamabad.

¶69

Mrs. G.Shyamata Reddy, W/o. G.Krishna Reddy, Aged major, occ: Owner of RTC Bus bearing ' No. AP-11-V-3505, R/o. H.No. 17-1-389/14, Prashanthnagar, Saidabad, Hyderabad,

¶70

R2 - Disd for defautt vide C.O. at,tAt.tZfil

¶71

...Respondent/ Petitioner

¶72

...Respondent /Respondent

¶73

AWARD

¶74

This is an appeat fited by the appettant/ lnsurance Company.

¶75

w
J -./

¶76

2' The Learned CounseI for the Appettan t / rnsurance company represented thi,tahe., Insurance Company is withdrawing the appeat fited by them.

¶77

3 The said representation is recorded and the appeat is dismissed as withdrawn, confirming the Judgment and Decree of the court/Tribunal betow. The amount if any remaining unpaid to the ctaimant(s) shatt be paid by the rnsurance Ccmpany within one (1) month from the date of receipt of the award, atong with interest.

¶78

The Respondent / petitioner is permitted to withdraw the entire amount.

¶79

5' This Award shatt be subject to verification of cross appeat/cross objection, if any' filed by the Respondents, otherwise the parties are at tiberty to appty for recat[ of this Order/Award.

¶80

Court fee paid on this appeat shatt be refunded.

¶81

No costs.

¶82

-or SA A ngGqTqrd-{ d;qn frft?B
The New lndia Assu^rance Co.. Llr,
@D-'
tairrqa tnfa-a srfrr+-di I qtrfrfu
I OULY CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY
I
AppeItant/ Respondent No.2
I
lnsurance Com an
it[6",
A -/-
CHAIRfitAN
BER
MEMBER
UEGA(
I
(
)
t r
+
ol le

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Hyd. v. Bayamolola Sibash, Nizamabad and Ano

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Hyd. v. Bayamolola Sibash, Nizamabad and Ano

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The New India Assurance Company Ltd., Vs Annarapu Venkata Ramana and 4 Others

The Depot Mgr, Tsrtc, Nizamabad Dist and Anr. Vs Vadde Chennamma, Nizamabad Dist and 5 Others

The New India Assurance Company Limited, Hyderabad. Vs Neeradi Lalitha and Another

Panganti Laxmi Narasimha Vs Kalakonda Srinivasulu

The New India Assurance Company Limited, Kurnool. Vs Kavali Ramulu and 2 Others

Smt. Goda Rajamani , Rajamma Vs P.Ravinder and Another