Disposed

The New India Assurance Company Ltd., v. Annarapu Venkata Ramana and 4 Others

Telangana HC20 Jul 2023MACMA/2770/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act was disposed of after the matter was settled before a Lok Adalat during its pendency, confirming the judgment of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal.

What did the court decide?

Appeal disposed; Lok Adalat award adopted; Insurance company directed to pay remaining dues within one month.

The New India Assurance Company Ltd., Vs Annarapu… — Motor Accident Claims | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

\x15t\

¶2

tt!I tI

¶3

rN rHE HIGH^{.""*l{i$JSiJNtoT TELANGANA}

¶4

THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMBASIVARAO NAIDU

¶7

MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 2770 OF 201s

¶8

., Appeal filed under section 173 of M.V.Act aggrieved by the Judgment and decree dated 11.09.2014^passed MATOP.No.948 of 2010, on the file of the ; Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-V Additional District Judge Kothagudem.

¶9

Between:

¶10

,The^{New lndia Assurance CompanyLtd., Rep. by its Branch Manager,} lVijayawada,^{Through Local Branch, Khammam.}

¶11

...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT NO.2

¶12

AND

¶13

Annarapu Venkata Ramana, W/o.Ramulu, Aged 45 Yrs, Occ: Household, R/o.Aswapuram Village and Mandal, Khammam District.

¶14

Annarapu Ramulu, S/o.Bhushaiah, Aged 49 Yrs, Occ: Coolie, R/o. Aswapuram Village and Mandal , Khammam District.

¶15

Annarapu Ramadevi, D/o. Ramulu, Aged 17 years, Mrnor, Occ: Student, Rep by father Resp. No. 2

¶16

Annarapu Venu Prasad, S/o. Ramulu, Occ: Student Rep by father Resp.No. 2 Respondents No.3 and 4 declared as majors discharge his guardian from guardianship Vide Court Order dated. 10lOGl2O15 in MACMA.M.P.1996/2015

¶17

RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS

¶18

Nasrullah Khan, S/o. Jafarullah Khan, Occ: Owner of Lorry No. AP-20-W' 4725, R/o. B.C.M. Road, palvoncha, Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶19

...RESPONDENTSiRESPONDENTS

¶20

¶21

¶22

MACMAMP. NO: 1996 OF 201s

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to t

¶24

; Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: NAGESWARA RAO REPAKULA

¶25

Court made the following: JUDGMENT

II tl TI {ili

rt i x

l i l .l1

rlI rl.i i i ll ;ll ; t.l,(I t*f{ ,l;

¶30

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMtsASIVA RAO NAIDU

¶31

M.A.C.M.A. No.277A OF 2015

¶32

JUDGMENT:

¶33

During the pendenc-r, oi tirc appcal- thc mattcr was referred to thc Lok Adalzrt, and thrr sanrc was scttlcd before the Lok Adalat, vidc Au,ard darctl lO.O6.2O2a)

¶34

Accordingl.r', this MAC\4A is c.lisposcd of, in tcrms

¶35

of the award passcc[ b., Ll r,.: i.t:l;. ,\ii:,ilat. No ordcr as to costs.

¶36

Consequently, misccliaril. oirs pctitions, if any,

¶37

pending, in this appcal sliitll st:tirrl llost:cl .

¶38

HD. SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTANT &REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

¶39

l-cum-V Additional District PUCI

¶40

.. . One CC to SRl. NAGESWARA RAO REPAKULA, Advocate [OPUC] Twg CD Copies

¶41

Enclosing a copy of Award of Lok Adalath

pr I I

HIGH COUFIT SS RN J

DATED: 20t0712023

*b^'a1 :.-. I $ '..f

J U DGMEN'I'

MACMA.N o.2770 of 2015

¶48

,'.,...-''..4 lit-Al ('
-.-
c 1! 0l:1m
... -\ i

¶49

DISPOSING OF THE MACMA IN TTFII E I A" AFTAI ]tI E,rI.IY O '. I L'T L\Jr\ AIJALA I

¶50

/
P-
t,
IA
V)L)
tI

¶51

BEFORE TI.IE LOK AOALAT HIGH COLIRT LEGAI- SERVICES COMfiTITTEE

¶52

(HIGH CO[',RT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD)

¶53

[Under^{Seclionl9 of the legol ServicesAulhoriliesAcl, 1987 (Cenkol Act)]}

¶54

Date: 10-06-2023

¶55

Present: 1. Hon'ble Justice G. Sri Derri Chairman

¶56

(Former ludge of High Court for the State of Telanganir) 2.Sri P.lndra Prakash, Advocate,

¶57

Member

¶58

,v1c esc
3.Smt. Nanditha Guha, Advocate,
Member
M.A.C.M.A.No. 277O of 2O15
L)
,J. (Before the Hon'ble High Court)
&r he

¶59

3.Smt. Nanditha Guha, Advocate, Member

¶60

AGAINST

¶61

M.A.T.O.P.No. 948 of 2O1O

¶62

( On the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal

¶63

(V Addl. District Judge), Kothagudem )

¶64

sEI /EEN:

¶65

The New lndia Assurance Company Ltd., Rep. by its Br. Manager, Vijayawada, Through Locat Branch, Kahamam.

¶66

. ..Appetta rt/ Respondent No.2.

¶67

AND

¶68

Annarapu Venkata Ramana W/o. Ramutu, Aged 45 Yrs, Occ; Household, R/o. Aswapuram Vittage and Mandat, Khammam District.

¶69

Annarapu Ramutu S/o. Bhushaiah, Aged 49 '/rs,

¶70

Occ; Cootie, R/o. Aswapuram Viltage and Mandat,

¶71

Khammam District.

¶72

Annarapu Ramadevi D/o. Ramutu, Aged 17 Yrs,

¶73

Minor, Occ: Student, Rep. by father Resp.No.2,

¶74

Annarapu Venu Prasad S/o. Ramutu, Aged 15 Yrs, Minor, Occ: Student, Rep by father Resp.No.2,

¶75

...Respondents/ Petitioners

¶76

Respondent Nos. 3 & 4 dectared as majors discharging his guardian from guardianship vide Court order dt:10-6-2015 in lvlACr\lAMP 1996/15^:

¶77

Nasrulta Khan S/o.Jafaruttah Khan, Age Adutt, Occ: Owner of Lorry No.AP-20-W-4725, R/o.B.C.M.Road, Patvoncha, KothaguCem, Khammam District.

¶78

pondents / Respondents
I
adtl [.]. .( '
"-iI
I t
llj. ,.ir;,,,., I

\ II
I

AWARD

This is an apoeal fited by the App-'ttant/ lnsuran ce Cornpany.

¶83

The Learned Counsel for the Appettant/ lnsurance Comperny represented tha[tie lnsurance Cc mpany is withdrawing the appeal fited b1' t]renr.

¶84

3 The said ret resentation is recorded and the appeal is disnrissed as withdrawn, confirming tre Judgment and Decree of the Court/Tribl nal below. The amount if any rema ining unpaid to the claimant(s) :;hatl tre^pa id by the lnsurance Company wir.hin one (1) month from the date of receiprt,:f tte award, atong with interest.

¶85

4 On such derosit, the Respondc:lt/ Petitioner Nos. 1 to 5 are permitted to vrithdraw t reir shares as per the apportionmerrt to be made by the -[ribunat/Lo,ver Court.

¶86

5 this Av,,ard ;hat[ be subject to verification of cross lppeat/cross objection, if any, fited b1 the Respondents, otherwise the parties are a: tiberty to appty for recall of thi: Order/Award.

¶87

6 Court fee paid on this appeal shatl be refunded

¶88

7 No costs.

¶89

,fa ft q** srtt+ +q-i ftrfriz
Eor Thc Nc$, lndia Assrrrance Cc.. Lld
^A
QSg9---
ftdrrfld 'nfua .m'.l-6ai lyfdf;rfti
DU LY CONSTI T I.,,1 E D ATTO RNEY
Appettanr./ Respondent No. 2
lrrsurance Company

¶90

(
\ q
/*t '){rn^A
CHA Rr\ AN /fiAEMBER MEMBER
oFL SEq
C
I l-Jr/1u ^n I IQT
atc( rhercdrl
t *
:bu Sli lo ol1
I
,l {
I

¶91

$-1,^-'

The New India Assurance Company Ltd., v. Annarapu Venkata Ramana and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The New India Assurance Company Ltd., v. Annarapu Venkata Ramana and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The United India Insurance Company , Warangal Dist Vs Meka Srisailam , Warangal Dist and 3 Others

The New India Assurancecompany Limited, Hyderabad. Vs Neeradi Gangadhar and Another

The New India Assurance Company Vs S.Krishna and Anr.

The Depot Mgr, Tsrtc, Nizamabad Dist and Anr. Vs Vadde Chennamma, Nizamabad Dist and 5 Others

The New India Assurance Company Limited, Hyderabad. Vs Neeradi Lalitha and Another

Hivarkar Nagesh, Vs Md. Jaffar, and another