Remanded

Panganti Laxmi Narasimha v. Kalakonda Srinivasulu

Telangana HC21 Jul 2023CRP/2056/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court discharged an order dismissing a Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 and Section 151 CPC. The Court directed the petitioner to pay the outstanding court fee before the Court below to avail of an opportunity to rectify the defect, setting aside the previous order rejecting the suit for non-payment. The revision petition was disposed of at the admission stage.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order held perverse; petitioner directed to pay court fee before trial Court by 07.08.2023; acceptance of written statements directed.

Panganti Laxmi Narasimha Vs Kalakonda… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³²⁵⁸ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

FRIDAY, THE IWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMBASTVARAO NAIDU

¶6

CIVIL REVIS ION PETITION NO: 2056 oF 2023

¶7

Petition under Articre 227 of the constitution of rndia, against the order dated.29-12-2022 in o.s1 No.66 of 2o1s on ine rii" or the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Nagarkurnool.

¶8

Between:

¶9

Panganti Laxmi Narasimha, s/o. Anjaneyuru, Aged about 46 years, occ. Business Fl/o G uvva to nioa ltv Vilage'. of Upp ;;#th;U't4;;; i -B ;i,p;;;;;ity,;ilil;]" Dindi Village of trtaigonOa'Oistrict'

¶10

AND

¶11

...PETIT|oNERyDEFENDANT

¶12

l Kalakonda srinivasuru, s/o viswanatha Krishnaiah, Aged about 46 vears. o c c. A g ri cu tt u re a n d E m p to ye", nyo e o, ;l ; pl iiv Vi iirii, ?,1 nlh;",ri;i' "' Mandat.^presenfly Stayirig in UvOeriOja.^"'-''--",

¶13

Kalakonda Venkata Raman4 S/o Viswanatha Krishnaiah, Aged about 46 ilr?T:;p..Agricutrureandpurohith,Fyo-*ffi^{;;p;,yVirr"i-"lTn".iulip"t}

¶14

3 Karakonda venu Gooar, s/o Viswanatha Krishnaiah, Aged about 46 vears. o Mandat. cc. As ric^presenfly u lt u re a no' Srayirig E m p royee, in etiryat-nvAJiaOai]"'R6 B;; ;; ;Lli v Viri ;6 " "i n""i ri.,"r,,ti-, "'

¶15

...RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS

¶16

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶17

Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fited in suppart of the peiitiol, if," fiign Court may-Oe pl";;;i" stay att further proceedings in the suit o.s.oo izos on the fire of slnroi Cirir Judge, Nagarkurnool till the pending disposal of th; CRp.

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. N BHUJANGA RAO

¶19

Counsel for the Respondents: None Appeared

¶20

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶21

HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICESAMBASIVA RAO NAIDU}

¶22

CIVIL REVISION^{PETITION NO.2()56 0F 2023}

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

' T1-ri s Civil Revisiott^{Pctition is filed by the pelitioner'} u,ho is the clefe ndant^{in O.S, No.66 of 2O15 on the fi1e of the} Senior Civil^{Jrrdge, NagarkurnoolDistrict against the order} dated 29.12.2O22^{in O.S.Nr-'.tr6 of 2015'}

¶25

¶26

¶27

Herrrd learneci^{c cunsel for the petitioner' Perused} the afirdavit an:l^{other recor-d}

¶28

¶29

Lezrrned counsel^{lbr the petitioner has lnformed this} Court that written^{statemel.lt was filed alongwith counter claim} on 07.12.2015.^{The suit is coming for framingof issues There} was delay on the^{part of th.e petitioner/defendant to pay the} Court fee due to^{lack of communicationfrom the counseland} petitioner/ defendant^{is readl1 to pay the Courtfee and sought} for an opportur-ritY.

¶30

It:;eems that the^{suit was hled in the year 2015, as} rightly submitted, $rritten^{stiltement and counter-claimare filed} way back on 07.12.201,5.^{'I'akingthe same into consideration} the C.R.P. is disposecl of directing the Court below to accept^the

''l'rV (

Court fec by setting aside the impugned order. The petitiorier shall pay the Court fce before Court below on or before 77.Oa.2O23, failing which the order stands cancelled.

¶35

With these observations, the C.R.p. is disposed of at the admission stage. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶36

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand

closed

I :

To,

//TRUE COPY//

l Sd/-P. NAGABH U S HAIVI BA ASSISTANT REGFTRAR lnl

¶42

sEcTtoN ogrrcen

¶43

'1. The Senior Civil Judge, Nagarkurnool District.

¶44

One CC to SRl. N BHUJANGA RAO, Advocate tOpUCl

¶45

Two CD Copies

HIGH COURT

SSRN, J

DATED: 2110712023

ORDER

CRP.No.2056 of²⁰²³

i- sTA fE qq
{)l tr\\ $8
tB t
r)
- +--i ,

¶56

DISPOSING OF

¶57

THE CRP

Panganti Laxmi Narasimha v. Kalakonda Srinivasulu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Panganti Laxmi Narasimha v. Kalakonda Srinivasulu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The New India Assurance Company Ltd., Vs Annarapu Venkata Ramana and 4 Others

The Depot Mgr, Tsrtc, Nizamabad Dist and Anr. Vs Vadde Chennamma, Nizamabad Dist and 5 Others

The New India Assurance Company Limited, Hyderabad. Vs Neeradi Lalitha and Another

The New India Assurance Company Limited, Kurnool. Vs Kavali Ramulu and 2 Others

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Hyd. Vs Bayamolola Sibash, Nizamabad and Ano

Smt. Goda Rajamani , Rajamma Vs P.Ravinder and Another