Single judge of the Telangana High Court disposed of a civil revision petition filed under Article 226. The Court accepted the petitioner's submission that no further adjudication was necessary. The petition was consequently disposed of with no further orders required.
The civil revision petition is disposed of with no further orders being necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
l32s4l
IN THE HIGH COURTFORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY ,THE TWENry THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE G.ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
CIVIL REVISION PETITI ON NO: 1781 OF 2023
Petition filed under Artlcle 227 of Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by theOrder dated 20.09.2022passed in l.A.No. 56 ot2023 in O.S.No.38 ot 2023on the file of the 1"t Additional Junior Civil Judge, at Jagtial District.
Between:
Md. Jafar, S/o. Gulam Hussain, Age 44yrs, Occ- Agriculture ,F/o. Kondapur Village of Medipelli
...PETITION ER/RESPONDE NT
AND )
MD. Lal Mohamad, S/o. Shaik Abdulla Age 57 Yrs Occ- Business,Ri/o 4-3- 161 1 2lCSl 1, lslampura, Jagtial.
...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER
Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri MD. FASIUDDIN
Counsel for the Respondent : None appeared
The Gourt made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SIt'I.. JUSTICE G. ANUPAMA CTIAK]A'WI\RTHY CML REVISION PETITION No. 1781 of 2|D2it ORDER:
This C: vrl Revision Petition is filed lry thepe,itioner 1n aggrieved Lr the order dated O1.O2.2023 1.asr;ed 1.A.No.55 of'21)23 in O.S.No.3S of 2023 by thr:lerLrneclI Additional .Jr nior Civil Judge, Jagtiyal
Learrre, L counsel for the petitioner sult.rt tterl ttrat initialll'. tl:c r('spondent herein liled I.A.No.56 cl 2023tn O.S.No.ll8 c'f 2C23 for temporary injunction an,l theCourt belou, vide r:r d,:r datecl O1.O2.2O23 passed an tx parte adi nterr m rlur- rtion restrarning the petitioner trll1'.;.O.2.2023 and there:Ll-, 'r vide docket order dated 02 0[i.102 3, the Court bt'los :zrssed the following order:
",t,,vrlit notice, collnter filed. List ol doc,rtn.Len - lllecl. I)r sted to 07.06.2023."
Leirrncr r:ounsel for the petitioner fu rthet ,;ubmitted that arftc'r he Lring tl-re learned counsel for the ti:rtir:s,the Court b,:lo,r' sr:t aside the ex parte ad-in' erirni rjunction order cltLterl') .O2.2O23 passed in I.A.Nc,.56 tl 2023in
a
O.S.No.38of 2023 and therefore,there is no necessity for
this Courtto further adjudicate into the matter
Taking into consideration the submissionsmade by
the learned counselfor the petitioner,the civil revision
petition is disposedof, as no further ordersare necessary.
Miscellaneous applications,if any, shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/. B. SARASWATHI ASSTSTAULREGTSTRARqb
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1 ?he 1't Additional JuniorCivil Judge,at JagtialDistrict
Njb
.*r-
HIGH COURT
DATED:23106 2023
a. rs .}
v
o
i
r$
: i( l,
,) I
,.i/./
ORDER
CRP.No.1781 of 2023
DISPOSING OFF T {E CRP
Cr
(i
V5
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court's application of Article 226 to dispose of the civil revision petition is justified.
Md. Jafar
Md. Lal Mohamad
G. Anupama Chakravarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
