Dismissed

Dr. Kumari Kondapalli Anjali Reddy v. Dr. Kondapalli Sudhakar Reddy

Telangana HC26 Apr 2023CRP/1173/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment deals with a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging a docket order passed by the Principal District Judge, Hanumakonda. The impugned order dismissed an interim injunction application and issued an urgent notice. The High Court disposed of the revision petition without hearing, directing the trial court to disposition the pending injunction app

What did the court decide?

The Court directed the Principal District Judge, Hanumakonda, to dispose of I.A. No. 511 of 2023 expeditiously within four weeks of receipt, without considering interim order observations. Pending mis

Dr. Kumari Kondapalli Anjali Reddy Vs Dr. Kondapalli Sudhakar… — Partition | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³¹⁶⁷ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY

¶6

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1173 OF 2023

¶7

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be^pleased to begs to allow the Civil Revision Petition,^questioning the docket order dated. OG10412023 passed in lA.No.511l2O23 in OS.No.32l2023 on the file of the Principal District Judge, at Hanumakonda.

¶8

Between:

¶9

Dr. Kumari Kondapalli Anjali Reddy, D/o. Late Sri K.Venkat Reddy, Aged 25 years, Occ. Student, R/o. Flat.No.2O1, A Block, Green Space West Square Apartments, Gate No.2, Dollar Hills, Manikonda, Hyderabad.

¶10

Smt. Kondapalli Kavitha, W/o. Late Sri K.Venkat Reddy, Aged 50 years, Occ. Household, R/o. Flat.No.201 , A Block, Green Space West Square Apartments, Gate No.2, Dollar Hills, [Vlanikonda, Hyderabad.

¶11

...PETITIONERS/PLAINTIFFS

¶12

AND

¶13

Dr. Kondapalli Sudhakar Reddy, S/o. Late Sri Dasarath Reddy, Aged about 80 years, Occ. Sr. Crtizen/[Medical Practitioner, Fl/o. H.No.6-2-66, Kakaji Colony, Hanumakonda City and District.

¶14

Smt. Kondapalli Pushpalatha, W/o. Dr. Kondapalli Sudhakar Reddy, Aged aboul T2 years, Occ. Sr. Citizen/Household work, R/o. H.No.6-2-66, Kakaji Colony, Hanumakonda City and District.

¶15

Kondapalh Vinod Reddy, S/o. Dr K.Sudhakar Reddy, Aged 55 years, Occ. Business, R/o. 6-3-600/R, Flat No.4B, Hill Top Colony, Erramanzil, Hyderabad

¶16

Kondapalli Pramod Reddy, S/o. Dr. Kondapalli Sudhakar Reddy, Aged 52 years, Occ Software Engineer, presently residing at USA, C/o Email id. 1. sap-pramod alias hotmail.com 2. rpramod @ yahoo.com Mobile Nos.001 630 5610193, 001 630 9787476. C/o K Sudhakar Reddy H.No: 6-2-66, Kakaji Colony. Hanumakonda city & District.

¶17

Dr. Kondapalli Praveen Reddy, S/o. Dr. K.sudhakar Reddy, Aged 51 years, Occ. N/ledical Practitioner, R/o. H.No.6-2-66, Kakaji Colony, Hanumakonda City and District.

¶18

tt//s. Lasya Hospitals, Rep. by its A,4anaging Partner, Sri Prathap Nayak, Aged about 35 years, Occ. Business, C/o. Lasya Hospitals, Kakaji Colony, Hanumakonda cily and District.

¶19

Rohini Medicare Private Limited, (Rohini Super Speciality Hospitals), Rep. by its [,4anaging Director Dr. G.Kranthi Rao, O/o. Opp. to DIG Bunglow, Subedari, Hanumakonda City and District.

¶20

B. lt4/s. Suchithra Township, Rep. by its l/anaging Partners, Sri N.Venkateswara Rao and others, 0/o. Pathfinder High School, Near New Busstand, Balasamudram Road, Hanumakonda City and District

¶21

(respondents 6 to 8 are not necessary to this CRP)

¶22

...RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS

¶23

lA NO:^'t OF 2023

¶24

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased pleased to receive the typed copy of the impugned order by dispensing with the filing of the certif ied copy of the docket order dated. 0610412423 passed in lA No 51 112023 in OS.No.3212023 on the file of the Prrncipal Drstrict Judge, at Hanumakonda in the interest of^justice

¶25

lA NO: 2 OF 2023

¶26

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated rn the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Court may be grant injunction restraining the respondents No, 1 to 5 from alienaling the suit schedule properties A to D, pending disposal of the above revisio n.

¶27

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. KOTHAPALLI SAI SRI HARSHA

¶28

Counsel for the Respondents: K S SUNEEL

¶29

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶30

THE HON'BLE SRI IUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY

¶31

CIVIL REVISION PETITION N0.7173 of 2023

¶32

ORDER:

¶33

This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of tht, Constitution of India, is filed by the petirioners/ pla in rif fs cl.rallcnging the docket order dared 06.042023 in I.A.No.5j1 of 2023 in O.S.No.32 of 2023 passed by the learnecj l)rirrcip.rl District Iu cige at Hanumakonda.

¶34

According to the petitioners/plair-rtiffs, thcv instrrutcr.l thc sr-rit in O.S.No.32 of 2023 seeking partitiorr anrl septrratc possession of the suit schedule property, against the rcsponrlents hcreir-r. Along with the said suit, the petitioncrs have filcrl I.A No.511 of 2023 seeking ad interim erpnrtc irriurrctiorr l{on,ever, the trial Court, by the impugned dockr-t orcicr, issuecl urgcnt notice to the respondents/ defenclants, ivithout lSranting atl-interirn injunction in favour of the petitioners.

¶35

(

¶36

Tlris Court, on 13.04.2023, while issuinl; notict lrel'ore

¶37

.rrirt.rissiorr, has directed both the parties to maintain rrrr/,s rTrrr.r irr r('sP(,ct of the suit schedule property, in all rc.sPc'cts.

¶38

¶39

Having regarcl^{to tht' lact that bv tl-rc irnpugneddocket} order, the trial^{Cotrrt hatl otrly issuedurgent rrotice to the} respondents/ defendarrts,^{rr ithottt goir-rg into the merits or} demerits of the^{casc', the (-ivil Rcvision I)etil-ionis disposed of} directing the^{l':at'necl I'r'irrcil''rI District]udgc'at Ilanamkonda'to} dispose of^{LA.No.511or l02l inOSNo.32of2023' as} expeditiously^{as possible,} 1'r^{cierarLrl'"' n'ithin a pcliod of four} weeks from the^{datc ol re'('il-rLof a copv of tllis clrclcr" Howevet''} it is made clear^{that thc learrr''''1Ju(!1i',cshall ticciclc the said IA' on} its own rnerits^{n'ithoil tlr'illi',itlf Iucrlt t'ti trv any ofthe} observations rnade^{bv this (-otrrt in thc ilrterin-r orderdated} 13.04.2023

¶40

Pending misccllaucoLrs^{petitiorrs,if} 'rn1',^{shall also stand}

¶41

dismissed. No^{order ats tor tr"is}

¶42

SdI. K.^VENKAIAH ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR //TRUE^COPY// .{--

¶43

SECTTON^OFFICER

¶44

To,

¶45

The Principal^{District Judgeat Hanumakoncla' HanumakondaDistrict} 2 One^{CC to SRI KOTHAPALT I :lAl SRI HARSHA' AdvocateIOPUCI} One^{CCto SRI K S SUNEET-Advocate[OPUCI}

¶46

4 Two CD^CoPies

HIGH COURT

AAR,J

DATED: 2610412023

g? STATE a
a 1
o
- ,,'.$ 1\B
ot)
$B'"'
iL:: I

ORDER

CRP.No.1173 of 2023

DISPOSING OF THE CRP

&+-r)

Dr. Kumari Kondapalli Anjali Reddy v. Dr. Kondapalli Sudhakar Reddy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Kumari Kondapalli Anjali Reddy v. Dr. Kondapalli Sudhakar Reddy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G. Narasa Raju. Vs The Andhra Pradesh State Irrigation Development

The Divisional Engineering, Mahaboobnagar Vs the Presiding Officer, Hyderabad and Another

A.Sundaraiah S/o a.Lakshmaiah Vs The Regional Manager

N.Induvadana Vs Sunchu Srihari

Bairu Seenaiah Vs P. Shyam Sunder Reddy

A. Venugopal Reddy Vs the Superintending Engineer Operation Circle and Another