Held that criminal revision case questioning sentence and conviction became infructuous upon expiry of sentence and payment of fine by petitioners.
Criminal Revision Case dismissed as infructuous; pending Miscellaneous Applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32se ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 937 OF 2009
Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C against the Sentence and Conviction passed in Crl.A.No.34 of 20O8 dated 14.05.2009 on the file of the Court of the ll Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC) at Adilabad.
Between:
AND
The State of A.P. rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.
,..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2009(CRLRCMP. NO: 1253 OF 2009)
Petition under Section 397 (1) of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioners on bail by suspending the conviction and sentence imposed in Crl.Appeal No.34 of 2006, dated 14-5-2009 by the ll Addl. District Sessions Judge, (FTC), Adilabad.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI K. MADHUSUDHAN REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent: ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following: ORDER
f )
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.N,q,GARJUN
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.937 of 2OO9
ORDER:
This Crimina,l Revision Case is liled bv the revlslon petitioners - accused Nos.2 to 4 aggrieved try the judgment dated 14.05.2009 in Criminal Appeal No.34 of 2008 on the file of learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC) 1n at Adilabad confirming the judgment datec, 04.01.2008 S.C.No.525 of 2006 on the lile of learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Nirmal.
)
petitioners accused Nos.2 to 4 who were undergoing sentence of seven years were released from jail on 28. 10.201 I and 2l.Ol.2O 12 respectively after expiry of sentence and payment of fine.
As a sequel, pending Miscellaneous Applications, if any,
shall stand closed
SD/.K.SAILESHI //TRUECOPY// OEPUTY-REGISTRAR(lrt
l
SECTIONOFFICER
to' ', The ll Additional District and sessions Judge (FTC)' Adilabad' ; +'nEli";tt;;iSeisions Juoge' Nirmal(with records' if anv)
iililtfl.y{qff:$!:;:":"H'f[Hq;"f lil]:'F9.1;111,"n,",* Hvderabad. [OUT] 7. TtiroCD CoPies gbr
t\
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0910212023
ORDER
CRL.R.C.No.937 of 2009
I
r! .b
<br>D;.. :i'
)
DISMISSING THE CRL.R.C AS INFRUCTUOUS
@
tn
t1 1r,r
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tak Karan Singh @ Kalu Singh
Dudhari Gurubachan Singh @ Dham Singh
Dudhari Dudhari Dara Singh
The State of A.P.
D. Nagarjun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
