Criminal Revision Case dismissed as infructuous because the connected matter filed by the accused was partially allowed, confirmed conviction, and modified the sentence to the period already undergone by the petitioner/accused.
Criminal Revision Case dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[325e ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 832OF 2007
Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 & 401 of CrPC against the Judgment dated. 09.01.02007 in Criminal Appeal No.1 of 2006 on the file of lV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Rangareddy district, at L.B.Nagar preferred against the order dated. 30.12.2005 made in S.C.NO.329 OF2004 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Assistant Sessions Judge Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar.
Between:
B.Srinivasulu, S/o. Gopalakrishnaiah, Hindu, aged about 57 years, Rl/o Raghavendranagar, Hayatnagar, Rangareddy District.
...PETITIONER/RESPONDENTTDEFACTO-COMPLAINANT
AND
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/COMPLAINANT/ACCUSED
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. N JAGAN, LEGAL AID (Not Present)
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Sri. MUTHAYA MURALIDHAR,
Additional PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: None Appeared
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICED.NAGARJUN CRIMINAL REVISION CASENo.832of2OO7
ORDER:
This Criminal RevisionCase is filed by the petitioner under Section 397 and401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, aggrieved by ttre Judgmentdated 09.01'2007 passed in CRL.A.No.1 of2O06 by the learned IV Additional District & Sessions Judge(FTC), RangareddyDistrict, whereinthe criminal appeal ispafiy allowed by setting aside the Judgment of Convictionpassed in S'C'No'329 of 2OO4by the learned I AdditionalAssistant SessionsJudge, Rangareddy District at LB Nagar,to the extent of Section 306 of the Indian Pena,l Code andpartly dismissedholdingthe Judgment of convictionto the extent of Section498-A of the Indian PenalCode.
2
Sri Nellutla Jagan, learned counsel, as legal_aid counsel for prosecuting the case on behalf of the petitioner.
J
As a sequel, pending Miscellaneous Applications, if arry,
sha-ll stand closed.
Sd/. T. KRISHNA KUMAR DEPUW REGIST
\
,TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
pr
kam
?
HIGH COURT
DATED:0910212023
ORDER
rH[-. S L,', ti.
',.
i)
1 7 JU',d 2073
CRLRC.No.832 of 2007
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL
REVISION CASE AS
INFRUCTUOUS
Gar,/,.,.[ - ene_-r(1ar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Revision Case is liable to be dismissed after being found infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
B.Srinivasulu
State of A.P.
Pattem Venkateswarlu
Dr. Justice D.Nagarjun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
