Dismissed

Bommida Ravinder , Ravi v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC1 Mar 2023CRLRC/83/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court for the State of Telangana dismissed a criminal revision filed by an accused under Sections 397 and 401 CrPC as infructuous, without requiring tax, citing counsel's submission that no cause survives for adjudication.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Revision Case No. 30 F of 2020 dismissed as infructuous; pending miscellaneous petitions shall stand closed.

Bommida Ravinder , Ravi Vs The State of Telangana — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

t^{3251 I}

¶2

HIGH COURT^{FOR THESTATE OF TELANGANA}

¶3

WEDNESDAY .TWO ,THE^{FIRST DAY OF IVIARCH} TUOUSAND^{AND TWENTY THREE}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER}

¶6

CRIMINAL REVISION^{CASENO: 83 OF 2020}

¶7

Revision filed under^{Sections397 R/!V401 of CrPC aggrieved by the} order dated^{2610812019in Crl.M.PNo 2848 of 2018 in S C'No736 of 2017 on} the file of The^{l\rletropolitan Sessions Judge Hyderabad}

¶8

Between:

¶9

Bommida Ravinder @^{Ravi, S/o late. B. Sammiah, Age 32 years, Occ} Labourer, R/o 1-134, Venkatapuram,^{Warangal District.}

¶10

...PETITIONERS A2

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana, Rept. by Public Prosecutor, High Court,^High Court Building, Hyderabad.

¶13

...RESPONDENT

¶14

IA NO: 3 OF 2020

¶15

Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the. affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay all further proceedings against the petitioner/accused 42 in S.C.No.736 of 2017 Pending on the file of Metropolitan Sessions Judge Hyderabad

¶16

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. MOHAMMED ABDUL QADER

¶17

Counsel for the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶18

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶19

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶20

cRIMINAL REVISI ON E No. 30F 2020

¶21

ORDE R:

¶22

This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 407 ot the Code of Criminal procedure, 1973 (for short .Cr.p.C.) by the petitioner-Accused No.2 to quash the order in crl.M.p.No.284g of 201g in S.C.No.736 of 2017 on the file of the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad.

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submlt that no cause survives in this revision case for adjudication.

¶24

In view of the aforesaid submission, this Criminal Revision Case is

¶25

dismissed as infructuous.

¶26

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

¶27

Sd/. B. SATYAVATHI DEPUry REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

tr'

SECTION OFFICER

1 . The Metropolitan Sessions Judge Hyderabad

¶33

The Xll Additional Chief Metropolitan [Magistrate at Hyderabad

¶34

The Station House Officer, Central Crime Station, Hyderabad

¶35

Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶36

One CC to SRl. MOHAMIMED ABDUL QADER, Advocate tOpUCl

¶37

Two CD Copies

HIGH COURT

DATED: 0110312023

ORDER

CRLRC.No.83 of 2020

'i'; sI.47
c+ {
{'v
t
1 B APfl 2[23
;
_-.--: -'--:-- j '

¶45

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE AS INFRUCTUOUS q1$

¶46

As.,

¶47

2:r\r\uo

Bommida Ravinder , Ravi v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bommida Ravinder , Ravi v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G. Narender Vs The State of Telanaga an2 Others

Vallabaneni Ravi Kumar Vs State of Telangana

Shaik Mohammed Saleem , Mahaboob Vs State of Telangana and 3 Others

Mohd shahid Vs The State of Telangana

T.Raghu Babu Vs The State of Telangana

Mr. Sunil J. Sachdev Vs The State of Telangana and another