Dismissed

T.Raghu Babu v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC1 Mar 2023CRLP/187/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice K. Surender dismissed Criminal Petitions No. 61 and 187 of 2020 as infructuous after concluding that identical criminal revision cases filed before the High Court on the same matters had already been dismissed, rendering the current petitions dead.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal of Criminal Petitions 61/2020 and 187/2020 as infructuous; closure of pending miscellaneous petitions.

T.Raghu Babu Vs The State of Telangana — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[32s1 ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF IMARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 61 & 187 OF 2020

¶7

Between:

¶8

T. Raghu Babu, S/o.Late Narsimhacharyulu Aged about 62 years, Occ Advocate R/o-Flat No.10B, Maram G.L. Heavens Saraswathi Nagar, L.B.Nagar, R.R.District.

¶9

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana, through P.S. Hasthinapuram, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature At Hyderabad

¶12

Nalla Biksham Reddy, S/o.Nalla Anli Reddy Aged about 27 years, Occ . Business F/o.18-1-15/3, 4, 5 and 9, Laxmi Nilayam Apartments Sama Saraswathi Colony, Karmanghat R.R.District.

¶13

...RESPONDENT/COM PLAINANTS

¶14

Petition under Section 482 o'f Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the lmpugned Docket Order in Crl.M.P.No.2410 of 2019 in C.C.No.105 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble I Spl. Magistrate Hasthinapuram, Ranga Reddy District, registered under Sec.'138 of N.l. Act against the petitioner/Accused, in the interest of justice

¶15

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2020

¶16

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay of all further proceedings including the arrest of the petitioner/Accused in C.C.No.104 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble I Special

¶17

Magistrate, Hasthinapuram, Ranga Reddy District,^pending disposal of the above criminal petition

¶18

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 187 OF 2020

¶19

Between:

¶20

T.Raghu Babu, S/o.Late Narsimhacharyulu Aged about 62^years, Occ Advocate Rl/o.FIat No.10B, Maram G.L. Heavens Saraswathi Nagar, L.B.Nagar, R.R. District.

¶21

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶22

AND

¶23

The State of Telangana, through P.S. Hasthinapuram, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature At Hyderabad.

¶24

Nalla Biksham Reddy, S/o. Nalla Anji Reddy Aged about 27^years, Occ Business R/o.18-1-15/3, 4, 5 and 9, Laxmi Nilayam Apartments Sama Saraswathi Colony, Karmanghat R.R.District.

¶25

...RESPONDENTS/DEFACTO-COMPLAINANT

¶26

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to^quash the lmpugned Docket Order in Crl.M.P.No.2409 ot 2019 in C.C.No.104 of 20'18 on the file of Hon'ble I Special Magistrate, Hasthinapuram, Ranga Reddy District, registered under Sec.138 of N.l.Act against the petitioner/Accused, in the interest of justice

¶27

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2020

¶28

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of Certified Copy of the Docket Order in Crl.M.P.No.2409 of 20'19 in C.C.No.104 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble I Special Magistrate, Hasthinapuram, Ranga Reddy District, in the interest of^justice

¶29

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2020

¶30

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be^pleased to Stay of all further^proceedings including the arrest of the

¶31

petitioner/Accused in C.C.No.104 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble I Special Magistrate, Hasthinapuram, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of the above criminal petition

¶32

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition in both the matters and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M. JANARDHAN RAO, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor (TG/AP) on behalf of the Respondent No. and of Sri T. CHANDRA SHEKAR, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2 in both the matters.

¶33

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶34

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶35

CRIMINAL PETITION No.61AND 187 OF 2020

¶36

COMMON ORDER:

¶37

These Criminal Petition are filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short'Cr.P.C.') by the^{petitioner-Accused} to quash the impugned docket order in Crl.M.P.Nos.2409 and 24t0 of 20L9 in C.C.Nos.104 and 105 of 2018 passed by the I Special Magistrate, Hasthinapuram, Ranga Reddy District.

¶38

Since the petitioner in both the criminal petitions is one and the same, they are heard together and disposed of by way of this common order. Perused the record.

¶39

When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented that on the very same prayer criminal revision cases are preferred before this Court and the same were dismissed.

¶40

As the cause does not survive, these Criminal Petitions are dismissed as infructuous.

¶41

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

¶42

Sd/. P. GOWRI SHANKAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ( il: SECTION OFFICER

¶43

¶44

To,

¶45

The I Special tV'lagistrate, Hasthinapuram, Ranga Reddy District 2. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶46

One CC to SRl. M. JANARDHAN RAO, Advocate IOPUCI

¶47

One CC to SRl. T. CHANDRA SHEKAR, Advocate tOpUCl

¶48

-- - '^t - =--,rioo ^t \

t I

HIGH COURT

KS, J

DATED: 0110312023

a .s v*
Lit
s*
N
'/,//
,//
c

¶54

ORDER

¶55

CRLP.No.61 of 2020 AND CRLP.NO.187 of 2020

¶56

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL

¶57

PETITIONS AS INFRUCTUOUS

¶58

qa
K

T.Raghu Babu v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Raghu Babu v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G. Narender Vs The State of Telanaga an2 Others

Vallabaneni Ravi Kumar Vs State of Telangana

Shaik Mohammed Saleem , Mahaboob Vs State of Telangana and 3 Others

Mohd shahid Vs The State of Telangana

Mr. Sunil J. Sachdev Vs The State of Telangana and another

Dheeravath Gowtham and another Vs State of Telangana and another