3rd responde n f de;facto comprainant fired t he r l.ose 1t compraint which register, d ald accordingly charge sheet rvar; .[ilerl. 3. Learned ;outrsel appearing for the petitror er. q.ould submit that there z re civii disputes in betrveen the petitioner, respor dent/ cle trcf, complaina,t and also Sml . Ta hera Abeda Begurr /L.W.2. He further submits that Smt. Tahr r.,:r Abeda Begum had ahered tl-re duJrlex flat and executed ar aqreertcl-rt of sale-GpA_ in favo rr of the 3.d respondent/ d efacto comprzrinar 1 . For the reason of the llrd respo rdent/ de-facto complainant not payirrg, ,she fi1ed the suit in O.S.No. 03li of 2019. Thereafter, for the r.eason of the 3.a respontlent try. rg to take possession of Flat F2, wl:ich was in possess ion of t re petitioner/ accused, complarint ,r.r,rs lodged with the Barjara Hill ;police on 15. 1 r.2orr and thc sarro r,4/a s registered as FIR No.362 f 2j18. For the said reasons, thr lret tioner filed suit in r) S.No.3 \2 cf 2021 on the rrre of IV senior {)ivil Judge, city civil corrt, H1'd rabad, to decrare that he is the ow:rt:r or the flat F- 2,which was par t of the cluplex Flat F-4. He furth:r. strbmits that the civiI suits rre pending adjudication, for th: said reason, Crimina Petitior has. to be allowed. 4. As seen frr m the record, there are disputes lrr between the petitioner, 3.a eLn 14rt, respondents. Hou,ever, lhe alle.gation is that
