Allowed

Nitturi Rajalingu v. The State of Telangana and another

Telangana HC12 Jun 2023CRLRC/198/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal revision filed to set aside an order dismissing a criminal appeal for default due to non-appearance. The High Court allowed the revision, quashing the dismissal order and remanding the matter to the appellate court to condone the delay and decide the appeal.

What did the court decide?

The order dismissing Crl.M.P. No.10 of 2021 is set aside; the matter is remanded to the District and Sessions Judge, Adilabad, to condone the delay and decide the appeal.

Nitturi Rajalingu Vs The State of Telangana… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA¹³²⁵⁴¹ AT HYDERABAD

¶2

MONDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE G.ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY

¶5

CRIMINAL REVI sro N CASE NO: 198 0F 2023

¶6

Between:

¶7

AND

¶8

Nitturi Rajalingu, s/o l/ondai?lr. Agqd 33 yrs, Occ Nit, R/o H. No.4_25lA Ve ncha pa ly vila g e, Kota pa ly Mano"a i Mi n"i,Lliri-dltl,"t ;=;;#;;

¶9

The State of Telangana and another, Rep. by its public prosecutor. Hioh court at Hyderabad throJgh S I o.,'p d.'tuir;;;";i"i/;;;il;i"ribiriiy"i

¶10

...RESPONDENT No.1

¶11

jNitturi Shvamala. w/o Rajalingu Ag-ed 29 yrs, Occ Student, R/o H. No.13_725, S a n^j eev a ia h C o I o n y. rrl a i C rr eii a l. tfi , r.L ii i' ol#i.j "

¶12

...RESpONDENT No.2/RESpONDENT

¶13

Revision fired under section 3g7 & 401 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in suplort of the criminar Revision oy case, the High court may be preased to arrow lte criminar Revision "r"" settrng aside the order dated 22_12_2021 p;s;J;y the D & SJ, Adilabad in cRL.MP No.1012021 in unRegd. crl.A.No.--l itiozi and restore the same to its original file in the interest of Justice.

¶14

IANO:2OF2 023

¶15

Etition under section 482 of cr p c. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal p"ti,on, if," High CourimaVL p[rr"O to grant stay of ail further proceedings in DVC No.+,q o{zo.ls oerore G-ri nJor Judicial First-Class Magistrate, Mancherial.

¶16

lhis Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri ANUGANTI PRANEETH, Advocate for the petitioner and the pubric prosecutor on beharf of the Respondent No.1 and None Appeared for the.Respondent No. 2

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

tI )

¶19

l t

¶20

HONOURABLE SMT.^{JUSTICE G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY}

¶21

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE^{No.198OF 2023}

¶22

ORDER

¶23

This criminal revrsion^{case is filed by the petitibner to set}

¶24

aside the order^{oated 22.12.2021passedby the learned District} arrd Sessions^{Judge, Adilabadin Crl'M.P.No.10of 2O2l in Un-} Regd.Crl.A.No.-- - of^{202 1 dismissingthe said application filed} for condonation of^{delay of 526 days in filing the criminal} appeal.

¶25

I-Ieard the learned counsel^{for the petitioner and learned} Assistant Public^{ProsecutorIor respondent No.1 and perused} the record.

¶26

Taking into consideration dismissal^{of Crl.M.P.No.10 of} 2021 for default for non^{representation of the petitioner, this} Court is of the considered^{vieu'thatthe order dated 22 -12.2021} of the appellate Court^{can be set aside.}

¶27

In the result, the criminal revision^{case is a-llowedand} order dated 22.12.2O2i^{passed in Crl.M.P.No.10 of 2O2l in Un-} Regd.Crl.A.N o.----- of 202-1 is set aside and the matter^is remanded back to the appeliate Court i.e., District and Sessions

¶28

¶29

Judge, Adilabad^{and the appellate Court is directedto condoue} the delay^{inhling the appeal' number the appeal'issue} appropriate^{notice to the respondent therein and dispose of the} appeal within^{a stipulatLd period'}

¶30

Miscellaneous^{petitions,if any' shall stand closed}

¶31

SD/- T. KRISHNA^KUMAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// qp

¶32

SECTION OFFICER

¶33

To,

¶34

'1. The District and Sessions Judge, Adilabad.

¶35

Z. fh" Siriion House Officer,^{Ma'ncherialPolice Station,Mancherial, Mancherial} District.

¶36

3 ,i;o CCs to Public^{Prosecutor,HighCourt for the State of Telangana,at} Hyderabad [OUT]

¶37

- dne cc to sRl AruucRnrt^{PRANEETH, Advocate} [oPUC]

¶38

Two CD Copies

6,<

HIGH COURT

DATED:1210612023

ORDER

:l1A
:]-,--,.,^.<br>/i :,
lal 1t t\\ ltfl
',i
., !:
,,. ,

¶45

CRLRC.No.198 of 2023

¶46

ALLOWING THE CRLRC

¶47

I
\ L 1
\u
o*k
go

Nitturi Rajalingu v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nitturi Rajalingu v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri NimmagaddaDarahasaLahari Vs The State of Telangana

Dr.M.Radha Rani and Another Vs the State of A.P. and Another

Gaddam Ashok Kumar Vs State of Telangana

Kalumula Naresh Vs The State of Telangana

Mr.Madhusudhan Gochhikar Vs The State of Telangana

DumpalaGuruva Reddy Vs The State of Telangana