petitioners throughout five days of post operative period because of which she had developed 'burst abdomen' rvhich is a knou,n complication of any major abdomir-raI surgery and is described standard in thc medical profession. To rectify the said problem, by taking secor-rd t.as opinion from the experts, the 2nd respondent suggested to join his wife in NIMS Hospital. But due to financial problems, 2",1 respondent could not join her in the said hospital instead joined her in the Osmania Hospital where her abdominal problem was corrected by doing surgery called 'tension suturing of abdominal r.r,ail' and r,r,as treated in .I.C.U. for twelve days. After shifting her to General Ward, the 2na petitioner and his team suggested the 2"d respondent not to'discharge her from the hospital till she completely recovers. Against their advice, she left the hospital and the sarne was recorded in the records of Osmania Hospital. Thereafter, the 2.d respondent contacted one Veeranki Dangi Kumar, Corporator of Vijayawada Corporation, who is also the relative o1 1st petitioner and demanded the petitioners to pay two lakhs rupees through him, otherwise he would ' \
