Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed as infructuous since the petitioner's counsel informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous.
Criminal Petition dismissed as infructuous with miscellaneous contentions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OFTELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE G.ANUPAMACHAKRAVARTHY
c RIMINAL PETITION NO: 4936 OF2023
Between:
Gaddam Ashok Kumar, S/o. Balaraju,aged 52 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Christian Colony Warangalcity, WarangalDistrict
.PETTTTONERvACCUSE D(S)
AND
...RESPON DENT/COM PLAINANTS
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumslances stated in the Memorandumof Groundsof Criminal Petition,the HighCourt may be pleased to QUASH the proceedings in Crime No.12312023on the file of the SHO, PS Mills Colony, Warangal Districtagainst the petitioner/ accusedno.2
l.A. NO:1OF 2023
Petition under Section 482 oI Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Groundsof Criminal Petition,the HighCourt maybe pleased to dispense with the filing of certified copy of theNo. 12312023 on the file of the SHO, PS Mills Colony, WarangalDistrict.
LA. NO: 2OF 2023
Petition under Section 482 ofCr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandumof Groundsof Criminal Petition,the HighCourt may be pleased to STAY of the proceedings in CrimeNo.12312023on the file of the SHO,
PS lVills Colony, W:rr: rr al Districi includrng the arrest o1 thep r: trorrer/ ;:ccused no.2, pending disposal )'main cnminal petrtion.
This Petitirn co n ng on for hearinll, upon perusing tire '4r,,nrorandum of Grounds of Crim nai F) :t tion and upon hoaring the arllunrert:; :f Sri Ajay Kumar Madisetty. Advo,;ate )' the Petitioner and Sri S. Gz nesh, .'\ssrstant Public Prosecutor (TG) on br h:lf of the Respondent No.1 and none :rp€ared for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the fc llowing: ORDER
THE HON'BLESl'tT' IUSTICE G' ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY CRIMINALPETITIONNo.4936OF7023
ORDER:
ThelearnedcounselforthepetitionerreportedtothisCor.lilllli.the
CriminalPetitionhas becomeinfructuous'
The statementof the learned counselis recordeC Accordingly' the CriminalPetition is dismissedas infrtrctuous' Miscellarlccr ti) ''Pl' '- 'rcns
pending, if anY,shall stand closed'
//TRUECOPY//
Sd/. T. JAYASREE ASSISTANTREGISTRAR G-D
SECTIONOFFICER
To,
KK
PR
ft
HIGH COURT
GAC, J
DATED: 08/06 iit023
ORDER
:)..
/. .,,.- . 1.,,; ur...,-
,] Z .ItlL ?UZJ
\i
CRLP.No.493tii of 2023
DISMISSINGi'"T{E CRIMINAL PE TITION AS INFRUC-TIIOUS
q4
nd..o .21\6"
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gaddam Ashok Kumar
State of Telangana
Sherla Kishore Kumar
G. Anupama Chakravarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
