Disposed

Bhutreddy Venkat Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC27 Jun 2023CRLRC/1871/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal revision case, the Telangana High Court addressed delays where five years had elapsed. The Court directed the Sessions Judge to dispose of the pending criminal appeal within eight weeks, extended an interim stay, and allowed the case to close. A petition under Section 151 CrPC was also noted.

What did the court decide?

Order to dispose criminal appeal within 8 weeks; interim stay continued; revision disposed of.

Bhutreddy Venkat Reddy Vs The State of Telangana — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR^{THE STATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶2

TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY^{SEVENTHDAYOF JUNE} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry^THREE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^K.SURENDER

¶5

CRIMINAL REVISION^C ASE^{NO: 1871 0F 2018}

¶6

Criminal Revision Case^{filed Under Sections 397 & a01 (a) of Cr'P'C} against the order made^{in crl.M.P.No.70 of 2018 in crl.A.No.82 of 2018 dated} 03.07.2018 on the^{file of the court of the v Additional Sessions Judge, FTC,} Warangal at Jangaon,^{WarangalDistrict.}

¶7

Between:

¶8

Bhutreddy Venkat Reddy,^{S/otula]la Rgddy} -@. M9llaiah Occ- Contractor,^R/o. Adavikeshavapur Village,^{Jangaon Mandal and District'} ...PETITIONER/PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

1 The state of Telangana,^{Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High court Buildings,} Hyderabad.

¶11

Z elrragoni Rajaiah, Occ^{Business, R/o.H.NO.6-2-7l3/1 , Balaji Nagar,} JangaonTown'lvlandalandDistrict ...RES'.NDENTS/RES,.NDENT

¶12

lA NO: 1 OF 2018

¶13

Petition under section^{151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed^{in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto} grant stay of operation of^{condition imposed in Crl M P No T0 of 2018 in} crl.A.No.82 of 2018^{on the file of the court of the V Additional sessionsJudge,} (FTC) Warangal at Jangaon,^{Warangal District}

¶14

Counsel for the^{Petitioner: SRl. RAMA MURTY P'V'S'A}

¶15

Counsel forthe^{Respondent No.1 : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR}

¶16

The Court made^{the following:ORDER}

¶17

¶18

THE HC NOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDE]I

¶19

CRIMI Vl\L REVISION CASE NO.1871 of il018

¶20

ORDER

¶21

This Cri ninal Revision Case is filed urcler S,ei:tions 397 and 401 of tt e Code ol Criminal Procedure , 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.'), quc;t.oning the orders passed in Crl.Nl.l).No.70 of 2018 in Crirni re 1 Appeal No.82 of 20 I B pass:d by tire .earned V Additionat S er;sions Judge, (Fast Track Court), tfu arangal at Jangaon, rvhr rerbv the learned Sessions Judge I mposed a condition tha1 the petitioncr sha11 deposit half of tte cheque amount rt,itbi r 15 days from the datc of tl e orc er u,hich is 03.07.20 18

¶22

Learned counscl appearing for the cctiti,rrrer is not aware of the rroceedings before the Sessions Crturt. Since frve (05) \rears hilve passed, this Court deem:, it ap.p'opriate to dispose of t re Criminal Revision ciirect ng t h,: earned Sessions JtLd ,e to dispose of the Criminal Al)pea u,ithin a period of eight (()B)^q.eeks from the date of rhis order

¶23

¶24

Interim stay granted earlier shall continue till the disposal of the Criminal Appeal.

¶25

Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand

¶26

closed.

¶27

//TRUE COPY/,

¶28

Sd/. I. NAGA^LAKSHMI DEPUILITEGISTRAR qD

¶29

SECTION OFFICER

¶30

To, 1 The V Additional^{Sessions Judge, FTC, Warangalat Jangaon'} Waranoal District

¶31

1. o;;t6 t" sriCirc^{Murthv P v s.A, Advocate(oPUC)} -..-. 3 i*J cc" t"^{publicProsecuior,HighCourt of Telangana(oUT)} 4. Two CD CoPies ks -tr

HIGH COUR'-

DATED:27101i12023

ORDER

,1 1 6E. Sr4r4
:..j''
l','. a
|',) 1[ IUB
\ t--:...,-;?

¶36

CRLRC.No.1871of 2018

¶37

DISPOSING OF THE CRLP

¶38

I ;t<br>9_() :--l

Bhutreddy Venkat Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhutreddy Venkat Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shaik Jeelani and 2 Others, Vs the State of a.P., Rep by Pp.

K.Savitri, Vs K.Narasappa

Narayanalal Vyas, Vs The State of Telangana

Kurma Kamalakar and 4 Others Vs the State of A.P.

Raju P. Shah Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. S.Nirmala Vs K.Arun Kumar