Single judge order where the High Court held that a criminal revision is not maintainable against an interlocutory interim order granting custody of cash. Consequently, the petition filed under Sections 397 and 401 CrPC was dismissed.
Criminal Revision Case dismissed; miscellaneous petitions pending if any stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32s1 ]
IN HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1512OF 2018
Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C. against the Judgment dated. 2Ol03l2O1 8 made in Crl.R.C. No. 323 of 2017 on the file of the Court of the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad.
Between:
Narayanalal Vyas, S/o. Late Nandlal Vyas, Age: 46 years, Occ. Business,R/o. ...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT 15-1-449, Feelkhana, Hyderabad.
AND
1 . The State of Telangana, through PS. Begum Bazar rep by Public Prosecutor ...COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT High Court Hyderabad,
R-3 is impleaded as per court order dated 2610012023 made in lA No. 2 of 2018 in Crl. R.C. No. 1512 of 2018 are amended.
...RES PON DENT/PETITIONER/ACCUSED
Counsel for the Appellant
: SRl. G. L. NARASIMHA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 : SRI G. SUNDARESAN
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE H0NOURABLE SRI ]USTICE K.SUFENDER CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1512 OE.2018
ORDER:
This Crimiral Revision Case is filed under Sectiors 39,'and 401 of the Code of Ctiminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P,C.') by the petitioner, to set aside the impugned order dated 20.(t320 LB passed in Crlminal Revisior Petition No.323 of 2017 by the lea'n':d Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, wherein the learnecl Metrol)olilan Sessions Judge granted inlerim custody of cash, which is interlocutory order.
) Accordingll', the Criminal Revision Case is dismisst:d.
Miscellanec,us Petitions, pending if any, shal stanrl <:losed. l;cl/- B SATYAVATHI CEI'UTY (I)REGISTRAR
//TRUECOPYi/
SiECTIbNOFFICER
To,
DL 6
HIGH COURT
KS,J
DATED:26/06/20i 3
/a
l's* ite sr4rE
$
?
,},
E 11'sE? 2m a
7
+
\Q)r, )Sr:p.ntCvtf?
'-:-i--
ORDER
CRLRC.No.1512 )t2018
Crl.R.C is dismisscr
Gf'"' Qv>,---6*'3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a criminal revision is maintainable against an interim interlocutory order granting custody of cash.
Whether the petition challenging the Metropolitan Sessions Judge's interim order under Sections 397 and 401 CrPC deserves to be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Narayanalal Vyas
The State of Telangana
Roop Chand Chowdary
S. Digamber
K. Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
