Dismissed

Taufeeq Ahmed Azhar v. the State of A.P. and 2 Others

Telangana HC23 Jun 2023CRLRC/1712/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single judge of the Telangana High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition challenging an order awarding family maintenance. The court held that the amount awarded by the lower court was not meager or inappropriate given current living standards, rendering the revision devoid of merit.

What did the court decide?

The criminal revision case was dismissed; the order of the lower court awarding maintenance was upheld.

Taufeeq Ahmed Azhar Vs the State of A.P. and 2… — Maintenance and Alimony | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^32ee l

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶6

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1712 OF 2013

¶7

Criminal Revision case under section 397&40'l of Cr.P.C against the order dated 261071201 3 made in Crl.M.P.No.525 of 2013 ln MC.NO.352/2011 on the file of the court of the Addl. Metropolitan Sessions^judge for the Trial of JHCBBC-cumAddl. Family court cum XXlll Addl. Chief Judge, Hyderabad

¶8

Between:

¶9

TAUFEEQ AHMED AZHAR, S/o.Shaik Ahmed, aged about 26^years, Occ Working in pan shop, R/o. H.No.296/1, R.R. Puram Colony, Borabanda, Hyderabad.

¶10

...REVISION PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

THE STATE OF A.P., through its Public Prosecutor, Having office at High Court ofAndhra Pradesh at Hyderabad.

¶13

Smt Farhana Begum, Wo Taufeeq Ahmed, aged about 20^years, Occ Household, R/o.H.No17-9-600/F, Chowni Nade, Ali Baig, Hyderabad.

¶14

lqra Maheen, D/o Taufeeq Ahmed, aged 2^years, Minor Under the custody and guardianship of Respondent No.2, herein, Rl/o.H.No17-9-600/F, Chowni l.lade, Ali Baig, Hyderabad.

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. MOHAMMAD ADNAN

¶17

Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRIVIZARATH ALI ASST. PUBLIC

¶18

PROSECUTOR

¶19

Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.2&3: M/S P JAYASHRI

¶20

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶21

THE HONOIIRABLE SRI JUSTICE E. ..^VENUC|OPAL

¶22

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1712 OF 2(113

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

The presen t Criminal Revision Case is filed s,:ek ing to set aside the Orde: passed by learned Addir.iona, mr'tropolitan Sessions Judge br the Trial of JHCBBC cunr Ad<lit.ional Family 1n Court cum X)lll Additional Chief Judge, Hy'derabad, Crl.M.P.No.525 of 2Ol3 in M.C.No.352 of ilo11, dated 26.O7.2013.

¶25

Heard lear red counsel for the petitiont:r and Sri YizaratF, Ali, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appear in61 for the respondent- Statr .

¶26

{ I

¶27

A perusal t f the record shows that the Revision f,ertains to the year 2O),3 at d the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to set aside the orr ler passed by the Court belcw sr-a tinil that, he does not have any suflicient means to rrLaintzrin his family members.

¶28

This Court upon careful consideration o.' the entire material on record and aiter hearing the submissions macte b1 both the learned counsel is of the view that the maintenancr arvarded by

¶29

¶30

theCourtbelowisverymeagerandappropriate'Cha1lenging such a meagre amount is not permissible at this stage as the cost of living standards of the people has been escalated. Hence, I do not find any reason to interfere with the order passed by the Court below. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain the Revision Case as the same is devoid of merits.

¶31

5 Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed.

¶32

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

¶33

SD/.M.MANJULA DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// Gp

¶34

SECTION OFFICER

¶35

To,

¶36

The Addl. Metropolitan^{Sessions Judge for the Trial of JHCBBC-cum-Addl'} Familv Court cum XXlll Addl.^{ChiefJudge, Hyderabad}

¶37

Two ics to the PUBLIC^{PROSECUTOR, High Court for the Stateof} Telanqana at Hyderabad [OUT] 3. one ic to snt. MoHAMIUAD^{ADNANAdvocate} [oPUC]

¶38

One CC to M/S P JAYASHRI^Advocate [OPUC]

¶39

Two CD Copies

KKS

HIGH COURT

DATED:2310612023

.,r.- z:--<\ .E SrAI(j O....
/',
ir
I,;yri I
11 $E?tm
\3
I.l
\ \r. rt v../.- , ,i-j,_ _-1.

¶44

ORDER

¶45

CRLRC.No.17'12 of 2013

¶46

DISMISSING THE CRLRC

¶47

b
2A?>

Taufeeq Ahmed Azhar v. the State of A.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Taufeeq Ahmed Azhar v. the State of A.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Panathala Murali Vs the State of Telangana and Another

Syed Zaffar Hussain Bilgrami, Vs The State of Telangana

Gudiga Raju Yadav, Vs The S.H.O., W.P.S.

Dandu Kanakaiah,Hyd and Another Vs Public Prosecutor,Hyd and Another

B.Balakrishna Chowdhary Vs The State of Telanganan, Rep. by its Principal Secretary

K.Chandrakala, W/o. K.Jalandhar Vs The State of Telangana