Dismissed

Syed Zaffar Hussain Bilgrami, v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC22 Jun 2023CRLP/6020/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a quash petition filed under Section 520(2) CrPC seeking to quash proceedings under Section 420 IPC. The court held the petition infructuous because the trial court had already recorded written instructions closing the case as 'Abated' due to the accused's death on 16.02.2021.

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Petition was dismissed as infructuous.

Syed Zaffar Hussain Bilgrami, Vs The State of Telangana — Cheating and Forgery | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

II I i I

¶2

[^32ee ]

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶4

THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶7

Between:

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6020 OF 2015

¶9

Syed Zaffar Hussain pitSlq1i, S/o.Syed Abdul Hussain Bilgrami aged about 57 5??13;fit?;3rliiness'f,/o'H'No^{zz-t-de+& obslunituo n"'io"iiJf:"N;B;6#8,.u,,}

¶10

AND

¶11

...PETITIONER/ACC USED

¶12

The State of Telanoana T.q. gy public prosecutor, High Court for lhe States of ^^{Telangana & Andhia pr;dedh.rivo.irojj"""""'""} 2' DirawarAli,,s/o.TahwarAri,agt,i65y"r",occ:privateservice,RT0.Fl/o.H.No.22-16e4, United Residency,Nooi.kniln er#]b;;."d;, Hyderabad.

¶13

..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS

¶14

Petition under section ^ag2^{0! cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds or crimilai'petition, the High court may be pl"_r-r"d^{to quash} the proceedings against it. ilutition"rnccused in cc No. 360 of 2015 0n the fire of the v,,Add"i.cnLt rueiroporilan Mtagistrate at Hyderabad , by declaring the same as illegal.

¶15

l.A. NO: 1 oF2015(CRLPM P. NO:5957 0F 201s)

¶16

Petition under Section ^agz^{o! Cr.p.Cpraying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum.of.Grounds or cn'rilri'putition, the High court mav be personar appearance pleased.to grant stay of of the a,^furrher petitioneis p..""Jing, /Accusei in in"]rJing cc rvo. iob ih; Liioi's "i;; ;i;#rJ..r"t"r*iir" ,T",!;Jl'"+#,,;:i5J,lffl.roritan^{rVragistrate?iy-oe.aouo,p.no,g di=p.,,r'.r} This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon hearing thu arguments of Sri pALLA DAMODAR REDD', Advocate for the petitionei and the Learned Asst. pubric Prosecutor on beharf of the Respondent No.1 and of None appeared for the Respondent No.2.

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

t *

¶19

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{E.V.VENUGOPAL}

¶20

CRIMINAL PETITION No.6O2O^{of 2O15}

¶21

ORDER:

¶22

This :Criminal Petition is^{filed seeking to quash the} proceedings against the^{petitioner/ accused in CC No.360} of 20 15 on the file of^{thc learnedVIII AdditionalChief} Metropolitan Magistrate^{at Hyderabad,under Section 420} of IPC.

¶23

Learned Assistant Public^{Prosecutor appearingfor} respondent No. 1-State^{bysubmittingthewritten} instructions^{passed on to learned Public Prosecutoron} 21.06.2023 \rrould submit^{that the written instructions} clearly denotes that the^{accused as died,the case has been} closed as "Abatted" on^{16 .O2} '2021^{ar, dtherefore,no} further orders are^{requirecl to be passed in this Criminal} petition. A copy of the written^{instructionshas been placed} on record.

¶24

Recording the above, this^{Criminal Petition is} dismissed as in lrucluous.

¶25

¶26

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this

¶27

criminal petition, sha-ll stand closed.

¶28

SD/. N. CHANDRASEKHAR^RAO ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR

//TRUE CoPY/t

SECTION OFFICER

To,

'1 . The Vlll Addl.Chief Metropolitan Magistrate^{at Hyderabad}

¶34

The Station^{House Officer, Dabeerpura Police Station' Hyderabad City'}

¶35

One CC^{to Sri Palla DamodarReddy,Advocate[OPUC]}

¶36

Two ccs^{to Public Prosecutor, High court for the stateof Telangana (oUT)}

¶37

Two CD^CoPies

BJLB

HIGH COURT

OATED:2210612O23

ORDER

CRLP.No.6020^{of 2015}

¶45

\r r r-- S: fA7 ai
t)r o
{ .I
\i:
), ll
lll
,-) tl
[2 ALIE zUR
;
:,.i
'\i r ,,
-.
.:,

¶46

CRIMINAL PETITION^{IS DISMISSED} AS INFRUCTUOUS

¶47

¶48

cq*

¶49

d1 )3

Syed Zaffar Hussain Bilgrami, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Syed Zaffar Hussain Bilgrami, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yella Venkateshwarlu, Hyd., Vs State of Telangana, Rep Pp and Anr.

M.Praveen Kumar, Hyd., Vs M.Lavanya , T.Aparna, Sec-Bad and Anr, Rep Pp.

kothagundla Venkatakrishna Pulla Rao Vs Kothagundla Yagnika

Panathala Murali Vs the State of Telangana and Another

Gudiga Raju Yadav, Vs The S.H.O., W.P.S.

Mohd.Riaz Mohiuddin,Hyd and Another Vs Public Prosecutor,Hyd and Another