Dismissed

Dandu Kanakaiah,Hyd and Another v. Public Prosecutor,Hyd and Another

Telangana HC23 Jun 2023CRLP/6437/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana dismissed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashment of proceedings. The court held the petition was infructuous as the trial court had already disposed of the underlying case by an order dated 11.09.2023.

What did the court decide?

Discriminal petition dismissed as infructuous since the underlying case was disposed of by the trial court.

Dandu Kanakaiah,Hyd and Another Vs Public Prosecutor,Hyd… — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2023)

[^32se l

l II : I,

i I

ill :ll li ill Il

i I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶7

FRIDAY ,THE TWENW THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW THREE

¶8

PRESENT

¶9

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6437 OF 2015

¶10

Between:

¶11

I 9/\NPU^KANAKA|AH,S/o Late. D. Laxmaiah Occp: pvt Employee, R/o. H.No. 49_ 47614 sanjeevaiah Nagar Bapunagar cnintat iyoerab;a;"GfiMb <i'rt'r,[riiupur, Ranga Reddy District.

¶12

Dandu Yellamma, Wo, -19!9-^{_D. Laxmaiah, Occp:Houehold,R/o. H.No.7_9,}

¶13

Ambedkar Nagar, Chintat,GHMC euthbuttapui, nLngi neUA/ Oiririit. ...PETITIONERS/ACCUSEO No. 1 & 2

¶14

AND

¶15

AND

¶16

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, Rep gy.its pubric prosecutor, High court at Hyderabad.

¶17

Smtsugunavathi, D/o^peruriafld Laxman occp: House Hold Rto. 8-3-231rN274rF., Sri Krishna Nagar Yousufguda, Hyderabad.^'

¶18

...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT

¶19

Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal-peiition, the High court may oe pleqsed to quash the proceedings in c.c.No.110 ot 201s on the fie ot tre court ot the Xlll Addl. Chief Metropotitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad

¶20

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2O1s(CRLPMP. NO: 6345 OF 20151

¶21

Petition under Section 482 of cr p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal-petition, the High court may oe pleased to stay of arr further proceedings incruding the applarance of 'the petitioners in c,c.No. 110 of 2014 on the file of the court of the xlll Addt. chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampaily, Hyderabad pending disposal of the criminat Petition

¶22

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri KALUVALA vENKATA VARA PRASAD, Advocate for the petitioners and the Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on beharf of the Respondent No.1 and None appeared for the Respondent No.2.

¶23

The Court made the following: ORDER

l i

I I I I I I

I I

HON^{I]URABLE SRI JUSTICE E'V'VENI'C}OI'AL}

¶28

( I,RIMINAL PETITTON^{No.6437of2O15}

¶29

ORDERi

¶30

This^{()rimina-IPetition is filed setrking to quashthe} proceedin;s^{in C'C'No'11Oof 2Ol5 on the file of :he Court} of the^{X II Additional Chief Metropolitan n'ag strateat} Namoall5'^FlYderabad'

¶31

Hea d the^{learned counselfort he pe' itic ners and} learned^{Assistant PublicProsec:torrelrresenting} responde^Lt/State

¶32

Lr:a'ned^{counsel for the petltlonerssubrnitsthat the} cause in fhe^{presentcriminal petitiorr dot s nc't survive'} thereforenofurtherordersarerequirecandh:n<:eseeksto dismiss^{t rt: same as infructuous'}

¶33

Lez ':ned^{Assistant Public Prose')utor'rppearing for} respond(^{nt/ State upon furnishing the copl 'rf c'nline case} status w^{,uL1d submit that the case was dispos:dof bv order} dated¹ 1^{Og.2O23 in C'C No'1tOof 20 15 on the file of the} Xlll Adcl^{tional Chiel Metropolitanmal{stratt at Nampally'}

¶34

¶35

Hyderabad. To substantiate the same, learned Assistant Pub1ic Prosecutor filed online copy of tJ e e_court proceedings

¶36

Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant public Prosecutor appearing for respondent/ State, this Court is inclined to dismiss the present criminal petition as infructuous.

¶37

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this

¶38

criminal petition, shall stand closed-

¶39

Sd/- T. JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// Ca

¶40

SECTION OFFICER

¶41

To,

¶42

The Xlll Addl. Chief^{Metropolitan Magistrate, at Hyderabad.}

¶43

The Station House Officer,^{Jubilee Hills Police Station, Hyderabad'}

¶44

One CC to Sri^{Kaluvala VenkataVara Prasad,Advocate IOPUC]}

¶45

Two CCs to Public^{Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana(OUT)}

¶46

Two CD Copies

BJLB

"$-'

{ I I i )

HIGH COURT

DATED:23t06IZO2S

ORDER

,-/--rtttri b
,t'.
Nt<br>$t i'l- tl
l.llt-
t/'
,'t/i)

¶55

CRLP.No.6437 of 20 ts

¶56

CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

¶57

,n3
\t<br>

¶58

¶59

Dandu Kanakaiah,Hyd and Another v. Public Prosecutor,Hyd and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dandu Kanakaiah,Hyd and Another v. Public Prosecutor,Hyd and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Panathala Murali Vs the State of Telangana and Another

Syed Zaffar Hussain Bilgrami, Vs The State of Telangana

Gudiga Raju Yadav, Vs The S.H.O., W.P.S.

B.Balakrishna Chowdhary Vs The State of Telanganan, Rep. by its Principal Secretary

K.Chandrakala, W/o. K.Jalandhar Vs The State of Telangana

Taufeeq Ahmed Azhar Vs the State of A.P. and 2 Others