Dismissed

Kotte Anil Kumar v. K.Sunithas Shalini

Telangana HC28 Jun 2023CRLRC/1416/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana dismissed the Criminal Revision Case for non-prosecution, noting the petitioner's consistent absence and lack of representation over multiple dates until the dismissal date. The court noted no interim orders or trial court proceedings information. Parties are free to work out remedies in the Family Court.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Revision Case dismissed for non-prosecution; parties at liberty to work out remedies in the Family Court.

Kotte Anil Kumar Vs K.Sunithas Shalini — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³²⁵¹ ]

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶7

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No: 1416 OF 2018

¶8

Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.p.C., against the Orders dated:16-03-2018 passed in MC.No.5'1 of 2014 on the file of the Court of the Judge, Family Court at L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District.

¶9

Between:

¶10

Kotte Anil Kumar, S/o. Chennaiah, Aged 48 years, Occ. Retd. Employee, Rio Prot No 70, MYE Vi',as, opp FC', oooo*n:1.#xi3l"T

¶11

#?,?,%Xffs3Jr3li.l"ii

¶12

AND^I

¶13

K.Sunithas Shalini, Wo K. Anil Kumar, Aged 43 years, Occ: Housewife,

¶14

K.Splendid Nehemiah, S/o. K. Anil Kumar, Aged 19 years, Occ: Student,

¶15

K.Quency Melchizedak, D/o. K. Anil Kumar, Aged 12 yearc, Occ: Student.

¶16

.Respondent No. 3.is being minor, represented by mother and natural guardian is the 1st respondent.

¶17

All are R/o. H.No.4-9-84712, Lectures Colony, Hayathnagar, Ranga Reddy District.

¶18

...Respondents/Petitioners

¶19

IA NO: 1 OF 2018

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in the order passed by the Judge, Family Court at L.B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy District in l\4 C.No 51 oI 2014, dt.16.03.2018 pending disposal of the criminal revision case.

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V. VENKATESWARLU (NOT PRESENT)

¶22

Gounsel for the Respondents: None Appeared

¶23

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶24

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^K.SURENDER

¶25

CRIMINAL REVISIO^{N CASENo.1416 OF 2qlg}

¶26

ORDER:

¶27

1 . As seen :rom the croceeding^{sheet, there was no} representation on behall of the^{petitioner on20.O7 .2OlB,} 1 3.08. 20 1 8, I 4.O2.2023,^{27.O2.2023,28.O3.2023, 1.8.O4.2023,} 2l .06.2029 and today^{also there is no representation,though} the case is poste,l for dismissal.

¶28

As seen from the record,^{no interimorders were passed by} this Court and there is no^{ir-rfornation regardingproceedingsin} the trial Court. In the said^{r:ircumstances,this Court deems it} appropriate to dismiss^{the revision for non-prosecution.}

¶29

Accordingl',', the Crimrnal^{Revision Case is dismissed for} non-prosecution. Needless^{t.o mention that the parties are at} liberty to work out their^{retn.edies before the concerned Family} Court. Miscellaneous applications^{pending, if any, shall stand}

¶30

closed.

¶31

Sd/. I. NAGA LAKSHMI DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// q

¶32

SECTION OFFICER

¶33

To,

¶34

The Judge, Fanrily Court at L.B.Nagar, Ranga^Reddy District

¶35

One CC to SRl. V. VENKATESWARLU, Advocate [OPUC]

¶36

Two CD Copies

kam $--

HIGH COURT

KS, J

DATED: 2810612023

ORbER

CRLRC.N0.1416 of²⁰¹⁸

,,r-.,.e ----G:= sf lr1 -l-<br>a.*- -r. rl.
'.2 ri
r' .
) ?.t l\t lul
\ l j',,
. .,r,.,ltti)
'
-;-'

¶45

THE CRIMINAL^{REVISION CASE IS} DISMISSED^{FOR NON-PROSECUTION}

¶46

"t*A-a' ^<\il'

Kotte Anil Kumar v. K.Sunithas Shalini

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kotte Anil Kumar v. K.Sunithas Shalini

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kurma Kamalakar and 4 Others Vs the State of A.P.

Bhutreddy Venkat Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Raju P. Shah Vs The State of Telangana

Mohd Baba, Vs the State of a.P., Rep by Pp.

Mohd Baba , Vs the State of a.P., Rep by Pp.

Chilukuri Mohan Reddy Vs the State of Telanagana