Two criminal revisions seeking recall of a prosecution witness for cross-examination were dismissed as not maintainable.
Both Criminal Revision Cases No. 1321 and 1322 of 2018 are dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32s1 1
j I ! I I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NOs: 1321 ANo 1322 0F 2018
CRIMINAL REVI N CASE NO: 1321 OF 2018
Crimrnal Revision filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C against the order dated 07-05-2018 passed in Crl.MP.No 361 of 2018 in CC.No.13 of 2017. Hyderabad on the file of the XV Spl Magistrate, Hyderabad.
Between:
C Venugopal Reddy, S/o late C. Jagan Mohan Reddy Aged 65 years, Occ Business R/o Anita House, 4 Cross Right Lotus Enclave, Medchal-50.1401 , Telangana State
...REVISION PETITIONERYACCUSED
AND
!.
1 State Of Telangana, rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad
RESPONDENT
... RESPONDE NT/COM PLATNANT
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend all further proceedings including trail in CC.No. 13 of 2O17 on the file of the XV Spl Magistrate, Hyderabad pending disposal of the Revision U/s 482 (1) Cr,P .C at the interest of justice.
CRIMINAL REVI SION CASE NO: 1322 OF 2018
Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.p. C against the order dated 07-O5-2A18 passed in Crt MP.No.362 of 2O1B in CC.No 14 of 2017, Hyderabad on the file of the XV Spt Magistrate, Hyderabad.
Between:
C.Venugopal Reddy, S/o late C.Jagan Mohan Reddy aged 65 years, Occ Business, R/o. Anrta House 4 Cross Right, Lotus Enclave, Medhcal-5O1401, Telangana State
...REVISION PETITIONERYACCUSED
AND
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petrtion under Sectron 482 of Cr P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affrdavit filed rn support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend all further proceedings including Trail in C.C.No.14 of 2017 on the file of the XV Specral Magistrale, Hyderabadpending disposal of the Revision Ulsec. 482 Cr P C at the rnterest of .lustice
Counsel for the Petitioner in both : SRl. R DAYANANDA REDDY (Not Present)
Counsel for the Respondent no.1 in both : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Counsel for the Respondent no.2 in both : None Appeared
The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI WSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL REVISION CASENos.1321& 1322 OF 2018
COMMON ORDER:
l. None appears for the petitioner.
2
I
dismissed. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall
stand closed.
Sd/. T. SRINIVAS DEPUXREGISTRAR (-iD
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
pr
I I i I
I I I I I i I
HIGH COURT
DATED:2010612023
ORDER
CRLRC.No.1321 AND 1322 0F 2018
HE STA} € o
'.t
!)
o()J $i [lJB 2$B
4
.u
t
t:;^.1:.,.';.1"1 ..y''
DISPOSING OFTHE
CRL.REVISIONS
$,
)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether Criminal Revisions filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C for recalling a prosecution witness are maintainable.
Whether the remedy for an interlocutory order is to file a Criminal Revision or a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
C Venugopal Reddy
State Of Telangana
C Swaroop Kumar Reddy
K. Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
