In inf ur tuous Criminal Revision Cases filed by a deceased petitioner, the High Court dismissed the writ petitions as the cause of action could no longer survive following the death of the petitioner.
The criminal revision cases were dismissed as infructuous due to the death of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32s1 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO
MONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL REVI stoN cASE NOS: 1518 and 1622OF 2018
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NOS: 1518 OF 2018
Criminal Revision Case under section 397&401 of Cr p.C against the judgment made dated 29t1t20iB made in D.v.c Appeat No.307 of 20.17 o,i tnJfilu oi the court of the v Additionat Metropolitan Sessions iudge (Mobite court) Hyderabad
Between:
...PETITIONERYCOMPLAINANT
AND
...RESPONDENT/ACCUSED
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NOS: '1622 OF 2018
Criminal Revision Case under section 397&401 of Cr.p.C against the judgment made dated 2911r2o1g made in D.v.c Appear No.297 or zot z ori tne ie oi the court of the v Additional Metropolitan sessions iudge (Mahrla court) Hyderabad
Between:
RA.IYALAKSHMI, D/O Sri J.V SARMA, ptot No.97/A, Journatist Cotony, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-33, aged 57 years, Orc. Nil
...PETITIONERYCOMPLAINANT
AND
...RESPONDENT/ACCUSED
Counsel for the Petitioner in Both: M/S RAJYALAKSHMI PARTY lN PERSON
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 in Both: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 in Both: M/S V DYUMANI
The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUST'ICI', K. SURENDEIT
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Nos. l5l8 and 1622 of2018
COMMON ORDER:
l. It is informed to this Court that the petitioner herein died on 19.04.2022 and the death certificate is filed by the counsel fbr rcspondent
infructuous. The death certificate shall form part of record.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stancl
closed.
Sd/-MOHD.ISMAIL ASSISTANTREGISTRAR //rRUE coPY// cry SECTIONOFFICER
To, 1 TheVAdd[ionalMetropolitanSessionsJudge(Mobile-CoUrt)Hyderabad 2 +;'., be;il'InJpiiaii6pnodEcuron,Hish'court ror the Stateor Telanoana at Hvderabad [OUT'l 3 #'id'i; MidiAJVALXKSfiMIPARrY INPERSoN [oPUc] 4 o;; ca io tvtlSv DYUMANI Advocate[oPUC] 5 Two CD Copies KKs / d
t
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:1910612023
^Ia
9.
t'
vz I
RUE2M
$s !)
/.
.::i. ....*./
',::r'- -',---/
.:..,;.-. .. .:).-
COMMON ORDER
CRLRC.No.1518 AND 1622 of 2018
DlSMISSING THE BOTH CRLRC'S AS !NFRUCTUOUS
v
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R. Rajyalakshmi
1 KRC Murthy
The State of Telangana
K. Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
