Dismissed

Naveen Agarwal, v. Kavita Agarwal, and 2 Others

Telangana HC26 Jun 2023CRLRC/1249/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A criminal revision filed under Section 397 of CrPC was taken up for hearing. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause did not survive for adjudication and sought to withdraw the case. Permission was accorded, and the matter was dismissed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Permission accorded to withdraw the Criminal Revision Case, which thereupon stands withdrawn.

Naveen Agarwal, Vs Kavita Agarwal, and 2… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶2

AT HYDERABAD

¶3

I\4ONDAY ,IHE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE IWO THOUSAND AND IWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO;124I OF 2013

¶6

Revision filed under Section 3g7l4O1 of CrpC against the orders dt.04-04-2013 passed in Crl.Mp.No..lg of 2012 in MC.No.82 ot 2012 by the Judge, Addl. Family Court, Hyderabad.

¶7

Between:

¶8

NAVEEN AGARWAL,, S/o Ashok Kumar Agarwal, Occ: pvt. Service, R/o Flat No.205, H.No.14-5-3i0, Shahinayat Gunj, Begum Baar, Hyderabad.

¶9

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶10

AND

¶11

KAVITA AGARWAL, W/o Naveen Agarwal, Occ: Household, R/o .16_ 2-1471551c, Anand Nagar, Malakpet, Hyderabad. A.p.,

¶12

Babu Snehal Agarwla,, D/o Naveen Agarwal, being minor rep. by mother (Petitionr No.1) R/o 16-2_14Ttislc, Anand Nagar, Matakpet, Hyderabad. A.p.,

¶13

The State of Andhra pradesh,, Rep. by its public prosecutor, High Court of A.P., at Hyderabad.

¶14

...RESPOND ENTS/PETITION ERS/PETITIONERS.

¶15

Counsel for the petitioner: SRl. GIR|JA SHANKER SHARMA Counsel for the Respondents 1&2: SRI DEVAKTNANOAN RATHI Counsel for the Respondent.3: pUBLIC PROSECUTOR (TG)

¶16

The Court made the following: ORDER

I I I l l

I I

H()T OURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENIJI:iOI'AL

¶22

CBTry t]LA L REVISION CASE No.1249 of itOlS

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

'l'his C: r rrr:rl Revrston Citse is filcrl agairrst the rrders purssed in M.P. Nr,.1!) o^','.O t2 tr.t M,C. No.8,) of 2Ol2 dated 04.()4.2013 by the learned .Irrdg:. \r k1l. Iramilv Cor-trt, Hyderabacl.

¶25

Whcrr lht raatter is takcn-up for hearing, lt:irrtr:d counsel for the petitirner srrbmits tl.rat t[.re caus. in tlre I]resient crirninal Revision^(lase :loes not sur-,,,ive lor adjudicar iori.^.-herefor.e, no further orciers n e requireci anrr hence, se.ks permissi,rr of this court to wrthdr:rrv the l.'in'rinal Revisicin Case.

¶26

Perrnissio; is riccordercl

¶27

Learned \t;sistant public prosecutor appr:iLring for the

¶28

respondcnt Stat, takes no obtcctton for the same

¶29

A<:coldirrgl the Crimrnitl Revision Case is clisrriissed as

¶30

withdrau,n.

¶31

Mis<:c lla;te )Lrs petitions, if anv, pendinll in rlris criminal petition, sh,tll rtls r stirnd closerl.

¶32

To,

¶33

1 . The Jrrdg,r i\ kl lional Fanrrly Co,rrl. at Hyderabad 3 . . One CC Une CC l(, : kr S R (;lRtJA SHANKER SHARMA Advoc rte [C)t,l_ ]l 4 Two CCs ic, I re DFVAKTNANDAN^pUBLtC pRosECUToR, RATHT eOr."ri" H,sh ao;;-ior.ii;€ f,tprjif :ltate of Tel..rrr, :rr- I I yderrbJd [Ott I] 5. lwo CD Cop :s

e fr\ c\ ,

I I I 1 I I

HIGH COURT

EWJ

DATED:26/06/2023

a-"''i\ a 91A rr--
/.,( .). <br>I
IS [ll$ 2$E
/.
<br>

¶40

ORDER

¶41

CRLRC.No.1249^{of 2013}

¶42

DISMISSING THE^{( RIMINAL R.C}

¶43

AS WITHDRAWN

¶44

{\ *'g

Naveen Agarwal, v. Kavita Agarwal, and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naveen Agarwal, v. Kavita Agarwal, and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dandu Kanakaiah,Hyd and Another Vs Public Prosecutor,Hyd and Another

B.Balakrishna Chowdhary Vs The State of Telanganan, Rep. by its Principal Secretary

K.Chandrakala, W/o. K.Jalandhar Vs The State of Telangana

Pola Reddy Sambi Reddy and 2 Ors. Vs Yarka Reddy Anantha Reddy and Ano.

Mohd Riyazuddin Vs Nasreen Fatima and Another

Smt. Gade Lavanya, Hyd Vs State of Telangana, Rep. by P.P., Hyd and Ano