Dismissed

Smt. Gade Lavanya, Hyd v. State of Telangana, Rep. by P.P., Hyd and Ano

Telangana HC26 Jun 2023CRLP/12399/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Criminal Petition under Section 482 CrPC, the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition. The respondent raised no objection. The Court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the criminal petition was accorded and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn without costs.

Smt. Gade Lavanya, Hyd Vs State of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2023)

I I

! i i :

[^32ee ]

i i

Ii I :

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶7

MONDAY,THE TWENry SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶8

PRESENT

¶9

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E,V. VENUGOPAL

¶10

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12399 OF 2014

¶11

Between:

¶12

Smt Gade Lavanya, Wo. Sri Nitin

¶13

...Petitioner/Accused No.1

¶14

AND

¶15

'1 . State of Telangana, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad. 2. Dasari Surender Rao, S/o.Sri Dasari Venkata Subbaiah,

¶16

...Respondent

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may^be pleased to quash the C.C.No.36612014 on the file of the lV Metropolitan Magistrate, City Criminal Courts, Hyderabad.

¶18

l.A. NO: 2OF 20141CRLPMP. NO:12727 OF 2014)

¶19

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court^maybe pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings in C.C.No.366/2014 on the file bf the Hon'ble lV Metropolitan Magistrate, City Criminal Courts, Hyderabad.

¶20

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments^{of Sri L. Ravinder,} Advocate for Sri C. Raghu, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1^.

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

E I ! ! i II i I r I

¶23

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JTISTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL} cRIMINAL PETITION^{No. 12399oF 2014}

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

Mr. 1,. Ravinder, learned counsel^representing Mr. C. Raghu, leamed^{cortnselfor the petitioner submits that no} further orde rs are required in this^{Criminal Petitionand} therefore, ser:ks^permissionof this^{Court to withdrawthe same.} l,earned counsel also^{endorsed the same on the bundle'}

¶26

Mr. Viz-arath Ali,^I<'arned Assistant^{Public Prosecutor} appearing for the^{respondent Statetakes no objection to tlte} sarne.

¶27

Permission as sought for is accorded.

¶28

In viev' of the^{sut>missions made by both the learned} counsel, this Criminal Petitron^{is dismissedas withdrawn. /}

¶29

Miscellaneous Petitions,^pending if any,^{shall stand} closed.^/

¶30

SD/. P. GOWRI SHANKAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

To,

//TRUE COPY//

secrr&FF-rcen

The lV Metropolitan Magistrate,^{City CivilCourts, Hyderabad.}

¶35

The Station House Officer,^{Osmania UniversityPolice Station, Hyderabad.}

¶36

One CC to SRl. C.^{RAGHUAdvocate} IOPUCI

¶37

Two CCs to the^{Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at} Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶38

Two CD CoPies

CHRd

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610612023

ORDER

91 p,I E OF
( 1s ,
r t$ !l
o tt ,. ) ti-,]:7
o
..Y
I ''f ':al "7
= =:t A'-

¶44

CRLP.No.12399 ot²⁰¹⁴

¶45

DISMISSING THE CRL.P. AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

¶46

Smt. Gade Lavanya, Hyd v. State of Telangana, Rep. by P.P., Hyd and Ano

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Gade Lavanya, Hyd v. State of Telangana, Rep. by P.P., Hyd and Ano

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dandu Kanakaiah,Hyd and Another Vs Public Prosecutor,Hyd and Another

B.Balakrishna Chowdhary Vs The State of Telanganan, Rep. by its Principal Secretary

K.Chandrakala, W/o. K.Jalandhar Vs The State of Telangana

Naveen Agarwal, Vs Kavita Agarwal, and 2 Others

Pola Reddy Sambi Reddy and 2 Ors. Vs Yarka Reddy Anantha Reddy and Ano.

Mohd Riyazuddin Vs Nasreen Fatima and Another