The High Court at Hyderabad allowed the petitioner to withdraw two concurrent criminal revision cases filed under sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C., and further allowed them under section 482 Cr.P.C., dismissing them as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the criminal revision cases; cases dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32ee ]
]N THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAO
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NOS: 1214 AN D't216 0F 2014
CRL.R.C.NO.12 14OF 2O14i
cdminal Revision case under sections 397 & 401 of cr.p.c against the Judgment datd 2410412014 made in M.c.No. 17tzo11on the fite of the court of the Judge, Family Court, Khammam.
Between:
Kothagundla Venkatakrishna pulla Rao, s/o. Narasimharao occ: Business Fl/o.Ramalam Street Gampalagudem Village a VinAaifnam,.,* Oiitnii ...PETITIONERY RESPONDENT/ PETTTIONER
AND
2 rhe state orreransana, Rep by puoric prosecu;H:
...RESPONDENT "Hi;:::0";0""'
CRLRCMP. NO: 1913 0F 2014
Petition under Section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of grounds of criminar Revision case the High court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order passed in M.c.No. 1712011 on the file of the Judge, Family Court, Khamma, dated 24.04.2O14.
cRL.R.C.NO.12 16 0F 2014:
criminal Revision case under section 397 & 4ol of cr.p.c against the Judgment dated 241412014 made in M.c.No.36/2011 on the file of the court of the Judge, Family Court, Khammam.
Between:
Kothagundla Venkatakrishna Pulla Rao, S/o. Narasimharao Occ:Business Fi/o.Ramalam Street Gampalagudem Village & Mandal Khammam District
...PETITIONER/ RESPONDENT/ PETITIONER
AND
.....Respondenu Respondent
...RESPONDENT
CRLRCMP. NO: 1916 OF 2014
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of grounds of Criminal Revision Case the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order passed in M.C.No. 3612011 on the file of the Judge, Family Court, Khamma, dated 24.04.2014.
For the Petitioner in both Crl.R.C. : SRI CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY, Advocate
For the Respondent No.2 : ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
For the Respondent No.1 : SRI KOWTURU PAVAN KUMAR, Advocate
The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER
HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL REVISIONCASENos.1214 and l2LG of 2OL4
COMMON ORDER:
Heard, the learnedcounsel for the petitionerand Iearned Assistant PublicProsecutorrepresenting on behalf of the learned PublicProsecutorfor respondent-State'
as withdrawn.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending inthese
criminal revision cases, shall also stand closed.
\
Sd/.B.SATYAVATHI DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII C#
SECTION OFFICER
To
Kj
B
HIGH COURT
DATED:21l06/2023
(
JUDGMENT
CRLRC.Nos.1214 and 1216 of 2014
or TE(..
t,
.s
' s
,v
ov1 |/
c ry9rH * >,/
CRL.R.Cs. lS DtSMtSSED AS WTTHDRAWN.
@)'*n
\b ?3
Kothagundla Venkatakrishna Pulla Rao
Kothagundla Premsai
The State of Telangana
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
