Dismissed

Nerugommula Sujatha, Karimnagar Dist. and 2 Othrs v. State of Telangana, Rep. by P.P. Andanr

Telangana HC20 Jun 2023CRLP/7520/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a百忙之中 moving under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the High Court dismissed a petition seeking quashment of criminal proceedings. The Court held the petition infructuous as the underlying D.V.C. case was disposed of by the lower court in 2016. All miscellaneous petitions were closed.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions closed.

Nerugommula Sujatha, Karimnagar Dist. and 2 Othrs Vs… — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^32ee ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

TUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7520 OF 2014

¶7

Between:

¶8

Nerugommula Sujatha, Wo: Ranga Rao, Aged about 50 years, occ: House Hold, R/o Rapalle Village, Gollapalli Mandal Karimnagar District

¶9

Julapally Ra.iitha, W/o: Thirupathi Rao Aged about 36 years, Occ: House Hold, R/o H.No. 2-10-1 14, Jyothi Nagar, Karimnagar.

¶10

Julapally Thirupathi, S/o: Srinivasa Rao Aged about 40 years, 0cc: Govt Employee Ryo H'No' 2-10-114' Jvothi Nagar' o"'*n'n':..r=TlroNERS/AccUSED No.3 to 5

¶11

AND

¶12

The State OF Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad

¶13

Nemarugommula Divya, Wo N. Swaraj Rao Aged about 23 years, Occ: House Hold, R/oHlG-'l7'APHBcolonv'Karimnagar

¶14

...RES'.NDENTS/..M'LA,NANT

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings of the DVC No. 1 of 2014 against the petitioners 1,2 & 3 Respondent No. 3,4, 5 on the file of the Addl. Judicial First Class of Magistrate at Karimnagar District.

¶16

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2014(CRLPMP. NO: 7031 OF 2014)

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay further proceedings in DVC.No.1/2014 against the^petitioners / Respondent No. 3,4,5 on the file of the Addl. Judicial First Class of Magistrate at Karimnagar District pending disposal of the^{quash petition.}

¶18

l.A. NO: 3 OF 20 4{CRLPMP. NO : 15150 OF 2014)

¶19

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Me norandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, tne lligh Court may be pleased to extend the interim orders dated 14.O7.2014 n Crl.M.P.no-7037 of 201 4 in Crl.Petition No. 7520 of 2014 until further orders.

¶20

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the lvlemorandum of Grounds of Crim nal Petition and upon hearing the argun ents cf Sri A NAVA MOHAN RAO, A dvocate for the Petitioners and tho Learned lissistant Public Prosecutor on tehalf of the Respondent No.1 and of None appeared for the Respondent No.2.

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL

¶23

CRIMINAL PETITION No.752O of 2Ol4

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

This Criminal Petition is filed seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioners in D.V.C. No.1 of 2Ol4 on the file of the Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Karimnagar.

¶26

Learned counsel for the petitioner present.

¶27

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent/ state by furnishing the online case status submits 1n that the case was disposed of by order dated 27.06.2016 D.V.C.No.O1 of 2Ol4 on the file of the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate of F irst Class at Karimnagar. To substantiate the same, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor filed oniine copy of the e-court proceedings.

¶28

Recording the submissions made by the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent-State and on perusing the online case status, this Court is inclined to dismiss the present Criminal Petition as infructuous

¶29

¶30

Miscellar reous petitions, il any, pendrng in this criminal

¶31

petition, shall stand closed.

¶32

SDi. B. SAWASWATHI ASS lSiTAl,lT REGI

//TRUE COPY//

I;EC TION OFFICER

To,

The Addl. Judicial First Class of Magistrate at f.arimn3gar [)istrict

¶37

One CC to Sri A.Nava Mohan Rao, Advocate [OF'UC]

¶38

Two CCs 1c Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana (OUT)

¶39

Two CD Copies

BJLB

Omq-

HIGH COURT

DATED:2010612023

ORDER

CRLP.No.7!i20 of 2014

¶47

./6=c<br>(
'(
o
tt 70[1 M t,
i.,
^ '',

¶48

CRIM!NAL PETITION IS DISMISSET) AS INFRU(;TUOUS

¶49

?flci :-a\q(r-g

Nerugommula Sujatha, Karimnagar Dist. and 2 Othrs v. State of Telangana, Rep. by P.P. Andanr

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nerugommula Sujatha, Karimnagar Dist. and 2 Othrs v. State of Telangana, Rep. by P.P. Andanr

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr.Mohd.Imtiaz Malik Vs Akberunnisa Begum and Another

B. Chandra Kaladhar Reddy, Secbad and Ano Vs P.P., Hyd and Ano

Gopannagari Narender Reddy, R.R.Dist. Vs P.P., Hyd and 2 Othrs

Bathula Pedda Venkata Subbaiah, Rr.Dt and Anr., Vs State of Telangana, Rep Pp and 2 Otrs.

Gaddam Santosh Kumar, R.R. Dt. and 2 Othrs Vs Gaddam Harsha, Hyd and 2 Othrs

Gangavarapu Ramakrishna, Khammam Dt. Vs State of Telangana, Rep. by P.P., Hyd and Anr.