The High Court dismissed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings as infructuous, noting that the matter had already been disposed of in a trial court acquittal order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32ee l
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 15401 OF 2014
Between:
...PETITIONERYACCUSED 2 & 3
AND
....COMPLAINANT
...RESPONDENT/ACCUSED NO.1
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the lVlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in CC.No. 293 o'f2012 onthe file of the J.F.C.M. at Bhadrachalam.
l.A. NO: 2OF 2O1 41>JILPMP. NO:16422 OF 2014\
Petition urdr- Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying thiat n thecircumstances stated in the lv4errc ardum of Grounds of CrimrnalFetitior,tre ligh Court may be pleased togr:rn1 sray of all furtherproceedingsin CC.Nr.293 of 2012 on the file of the Judicial I'lagistrate of First Class atBhadrechalirrarrd to passsuch other order or crdeT;.
This Petitic,nr--c ming on for hearing, uponperrsinlt tlre [t4emorandum of Grounds of Crimira F'etition and upon hearing the argumen.s olSri PRAVEEN KUMAR VEERJALT,, Advocate for the Petitioner rrnd tlre ArlditionalPublic Prosecutor on b,:h rlf of the Respondent No.1 an(l Ncre appeared forthe Respondents No.12&t.
The Court made the fc,llowing: ORDER
\ \
It I
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION No .15401 of 2014
ORDER:
Heard Sri Praveen Kumar Veerjala, [earned counsel for the petitioners/accused Nos.2&3, no representation for unofficiat respondent. Sri Khaza Vizarath Ali, Iearned Assistant pubtic Prosecutor representing [earned public prosecutor is present.
I I
EVV,] ( RLP 15401 2014
2
stated l.hat the subject matter in the crimirtalpre'titroris disposed in the natt re of contested-acquittat d;rted 1').03.2018vide Registration Nr.100293/20'l 2 on the fite of Judir:i,rI A{agrstrate of First Ctass at Bhadrachalam.
Court is inr:ti re d to dismiss this criminalpetitiorr is' inl'ructuous.
As a srquet, miscettaneous petitions,pencli.rg f any, shatl. stand ctosed
S D/-B.rl1'lAt\ DRA PRAKASH AS SiI S'TA NI.T REGISTRAR (11l, //TRUE COPY//
SE(:TION OFFICER
To,
b
I
HIGH COUR]
EW,J
DATED:2010(.11r-023
.r.il ....
'Ls3
i\ii
I
ORDER
CRLP.No.1540'1 ot 2014
DISMISSING HE CRL.P AS INFRUCTI'OUS WITHOUT CC STS
Cs)66')
E o .?
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal proceedings are pending and thus a petition to quash under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is maintainable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bathula Ankamma
The State Of Telangana
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
