Chemiti Venkata , Prasad, Hyd v. State of Telangana, Rep. by P.P., Hyd and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
GOURT FOR TIIE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
GOURT FOR TIIE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32ss l
H]GTI GOURT FOR TIIE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAYOF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW THREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMIN AL PETITION NO:9270 OF 2014
Between:
Chemiti Venkata @ Prasad, s/o CP Rao aged 52 years, occ business r/o house no. A-5, Anand Sheel endave NaIdlnagal Barilara Hitts, Hyderabad ai present residing at 39, Braewood Place Dallas TX 7S24S, USA' '
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1
AND
petition u nd er section 482 "r c,.p. i'XE:fnto ilJl',t"tffJ"":,:H:tJll stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the FIR No. s1712o14 on the file of saifabad potice station, Hyderabad
I.A NO: 1 OF 2o1(CRLPMP. O:9002 oF 2014t
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition,the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in FIR no. s1lt2o14 on the fite of saifabad police station, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the Criminal petition;
This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri Vivek Jain, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and of Sri P. Vishnu Vardhan Reddy, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2
The Court made the following: ORDER
II
HOII OURABLE SRIJUSTICE E.V.VENIIGOPAL
c i:IMINALPETITIO N No.927O of 2OLtl
ORDER:
This cri:r;nal petition is frledseekin6l 1q rlLlash the FIR No.517 ol2') 14on the file ofSaifabadfkr iceStation, Hyderabad.
2
a.ppearing for respondent-State, ttris Court is inclined to disrniss
the criminal petition as infructuous.
infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this criminal
petition, shall also stand closed.
Sd/. G. SIREESHA ASSISTANTREGISTBAR /rrRUE COPY// ,(',>"SECNOF OFFICER
To, 1. The StationHouse Officer, Saifabad PoliceStation' Hlderabad' i- i;;td t" it'JFuoriiProsecutor, High court for the state of relangana' fOUTI
r. 5nl cc toSri Vivek Jain'Advocat{oPUC) ;. 6;; ca io srip. vi.t'n,VardhanRi#dv,AdvocatqoPuc)
MBC
6
I
HlclFl COURT
DATE ): 0210812023
;A r
e
, )(-
/,.
tl r SEP ?UA
ORDER
CRLP.No.927'0 ot 2014
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION
aX
B
+2,
$
AS INFRLICTUOUS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chemiti Venkata @ Prasad
The State of Telangana
Kaja Nehru
E. V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court