In a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the High Court of Telangana dismissed the petitioner's plea to condone a delay of 373 days in filing a Criminal Revision against the trial court's order,
Criminal Petition No. 13382 of 2015 dismissed; prayer to condone delay of 373 days rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND ANI] TWENTY THREE
P RES ENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION NO 13382 0F 2015
Between:
SUNCHAIARAVINt)ER, S/o Late Pitcharah Aged 38 years, Occ: CycleShop, R/o.H.No 3-1/2, Parvathagiri Village and Mandal, Warangal Distflct.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONOENTS
Petition under Sectron 482 of Cr f) C., praytng that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grou,,ds of Crrminal Petrtion the High Court may be pieased lo call for the records pertaint,ig to the order passed in Crt.lr/.p.No.242 of 2015, in Unregistered Crl.Revrsron of 2015,dat€.c 15 t0 2015, on the frte of principal Sessions Judge at Warangal and Q rash the sai'nL. :lrci consequently allow the petition filed by the petitioner herein for cc:tc,jr;:2tion of det:t'y of 373 days in fling Criminal Revision filed against the order passed r r MC No1 1 oI 2010,ciated 24.12.2013.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(CRLPI4P. NO: 1 3303 0F 2015 )
Petition under Sectron 482 of Cr f) C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criinrnat Petiiioa, the High Court may be pteased to Stay all further proceedrngs in lvlC.Nc.11 of 2010,dated 24.12.2013,on the file of lllAdditional Judicial First Class lrziagistrate at Warangal.
This Petition cominr-j on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petrtron and r-rpon hearing ihc arguments of Srr ALLADI RAVINDER, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Publrc Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None Appeared lor the Respondent Nos 2 & 3
The Court made the follol;iirg: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION No.13382 OF 2015
ORDER:
The present Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. seeking to call for the records pertaining to the order passed in Cr1.M.P.No.242 of 2015 in unregistered Crl.R-2015 dated 16.10.2015 on the file of the Court of learned Principal Sessions Judge, at Warangal (for short, "the trial court") and quash the same and consequently, allow the petition frled by the' petitioner herein for condonation of delay of 373 clays in hling Criminal Revision against the order passed in M.C.No.1l of 20I0 dated 24.12.2013.
2
condonethe delay of 373 days in preferring the CriminalRevisron before the trialcourt. Aggrieved by the same' the present CriminalPetition.
5 Accordingly,the Criminal Petition is dismissed'
MiscellaneousPetitions,pendingifany,shallstandclosed
Sd/- V.KAVITHA ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
,TRUECOPY//
SECTIONOFFICER
To,
pcsd W kam
I
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:02/08/2023
ORDER
CRLP.No.13382 of 2015
.o S{rAfg
I
(
,
o
$S SEP M
r) at
I
I
OESPAl
-.:_,
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION
g'd+e
*
-rn,
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should condone the delay of 373 days in filing the Criminal Revision given the lack of sufficient reasonable cause.
Whether Section 482 Cr.P.C. can be invoked to quash the dismissal of the condonation petition.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
NoneReferred
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sunchai Ravinder
State of Telangana
Kunchala Sushmrtha
Kunchala Nishrna
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
