Dismissed

Korepu Lingareddy v. the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another

Telangana HC2 Aug 2023CRLP/13528/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought to quash FIR and stay proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Court observed investigation completed and case referred as false. Criminal petition and pending miscellaneous petitions dismissed as infructuous.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition No.13528 of 2015 and all miscellaneous petitions pending are dismissed as infructuous.

Korepu Lingareddy Vs the State of… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^32ee I

¶2

IN THE TIIGII COURT FOR^{THE STATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY^{OF AUGUST} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

:PRESENT:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶6

CRIMIN PETITION NO: 1352E O^{F 2015}

¶7

Bctween:

¶8

Korepu Lingareddy, S/o Raghupathy Reddy, R/o^{RenikuntaVillage, TimmapurMandal,} Karirnnagar District.

¶9

...Pctitioner/Accuscd No. I

¶10

AND

¶11

The State Of Telangana, REP by PUBLIC^{PROSECUTOR,High Court at Hyderabad} For the State ofTelangana and Andhra^Pradesh.

¶12

,..1'( Respondcnt

¶13

Bandi Chandra Reddy, S/o late Malla^{Reddy,R/o Block No. HusnabadVillageand} Mandal, Karimnagar District.

¶14

...2nd RespondenUde-facto Complainant

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^{prayingthat in the circumstancesstatedin} the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,^{the HighCourtmaybe pleased to} quash the FIR No. 506/2015 dated 10-12-2015 on the file of the Karimnagar^{I Town} Police S tation.

¶16

I.A. NO: I OF 20 I 5⁽ CRLPMP. NO: 13462 OF²⁰¹⁵⁾

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the^{circumstances statedin} the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may^{be pleasedto} stay all proceedings against the petitioner in connection with FIR No. 506/2015^dated 10-12-2015 on the file of the Karimnagar I Town Police Station, including^{arrestof the} petitioner.

¶18

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Mcmorandum of^Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Sundaresh,^{Iearned counsel} representing Sri K S MURTHY, Advocate for the Petitioner,^{Sri VizarathAIi, Public} Prosecutor, on behalf of thc Respondent No.l and Nonc^appeared, for the^Respondent No.2

¶19

The Court made thc following:

¶20

, I

¶21

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL

¶22

CRIMINAL PETITION No.13528 OF²⁰¹¹⁵

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

The present Criminal Petition is filed^{under Section482 of} Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the F.l.R.No.506 of^{2015 dated} lO.I2.2Ol5 on the file of the Karimnagar^{I Town Police Station.}

¶25

Heard Mr. Sundaresh, learned counsel^representing Mr. K.S. Murthy, learned counsel^{for thepetit:.onerand} Mr. Vizarath Ali, learned Assistant Public^{Prosecutorappearing} for the respondent State.

¶26

trarned counsel for the petitioner submitted that^{the cause} in the Criminai Petition does not survive^{as the inves;tigationis} complete and the case was referred^{to as "false"a s per the} proceedings of Assistant Commissioner of^{Police, Hu:;nabadon} 31.05.2019. Therefore, seeks to dismiss^{the CriminalPetition as} infructuous.

¶27

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor by filing^{the letter} dated 11.07.2023 addressed by^{the Sub-lnspector of Police,} Husnabad P.S., Siddipet District^{submittedthat during the} course of investigation, the Crime^{No.506 of 2015on the file of}

¶28

¶29

Karimnagar I Tou,n P.S. was transferred to Husnabad p.S., on the point of jurisdiction and was re-registered as Crime No.344 of 2015. The investigation was completed and the case was referred as "false". Therefore, seeks to dismiss the Criminal Petition as infructuous

¶30

Recording the submissions made by both the learned counsel, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous

¶31

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

¶32

Sd/-T.JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGIST

//TRUE COPYII

SECTION OFFICER

To,

I . The Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Karimnagar. 2. The Station House Officer, Police Station Karimnagar I town, Karimnagar Distnct. 3. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad.[OUT]

¶37

One CC to Sri K S MURTHY, Advocate [OPUC]

¶38

Two CD Copies SP

HIGH COURT

EVV.J

DATED:02108/2023

ORDER

CRLP.No.1352E of 2015

¶46

l;r)r'1ji. r-t - .
i
t; : 1 IJ SIP lm
-,,:
I,,
d.,l
a 'r / ,- .' , '?,
'i-.g .'

¶47

CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

¶48

@r'g"l Bro \

Korepu Lingareddy v. the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Korepu Lingareddy v. the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kolipaka Raju, Warangal Dt., Vs the State of Telangana, Rep Pp and Anr.

N.Rajender Vs the State of A.P. and Another

Roopa Volety and Another Vs State of Ap., and Another

Smt.Mundra Sangeetha, Nizamabad., Vs Mundra Krishna, Hyd and 2 Otrs., Rep Pp.

Kunchala Ravinder Vs the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Others

G. Shanmukha Chary, Nakrekal Vs Dr. Kalakotla Vijay Mohan, Nalgonda and Ano